Analysis of the use of Twitter as a learning strategy in master’s studies

References

• Anderson, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook (pp. 543–559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C. L., & Gao, F. (2011). Gender, Twitter and news content. Journalism Studies, 12, 490–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J.(2011). Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. In WSDM ‘11 Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 65–74). Hong Kong: WSDM.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, P. K. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million fFollower fallacy. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 10–17). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. C. (2010). A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: Diffusion of innovation theory. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved August 1, 2013 from http://www.asis.org/asist2010/proceedings/proceedings/ASIST_AM10/submissions/295_Final_Submission.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Muilenburg, L., & Tanner, E. (2001). How do student participate in synchronous and asynchronous online discussions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25, 351–366.
   Google Scholar
• Duan, Y., Jiang, L., Qin, T., Zhou, M., & Shum, H. Y. (2010). An empirical study on learning to rank of tweets. In COLING ‘10 Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 295–303). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Espuny, C., González, J., Lleixà, M., & Gisbert, M. (2011). University students’ attitudes towards and expectations of the educational use of social networks. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 8, 171–185. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3666719
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, J. (2013). Wordle. Retrieved July 29, 2010, from http://www.wordle.net
   Google Scholar
• Feliz, S., Feliz, T., & Ricoy, M. C. (2013). Yo, tú y teo: Diseño y evaluación de la actividad formativa. In M. Santamaría, & A. Sánchez-Elvira (Coords.), Innovación docente universitaria en entornos de aprendizaje enriquecidos (pp. 293–295). Madrid: UNED.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkridge, D., Armellini, A., Nikoi, S., Rowlett, T., & Witthaus, G. (2010). Curriculum, intellectual property rights and open educational resources in British universities – and beyond. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22, 162–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the Joint 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop 2007. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/get/a/publication/369.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. A. (2011). The effect of Twitter posts on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 36, 21–38. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2010.534798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 119–132. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387x/abstract
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassens-Noor, E. (2012). Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13, 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M., Loddington, S., Manuel, S., & Oppenheim, Ch. (2008). Analysis of academic attitudes and existing processes to inform the design of teaching and learning material repositories: A user-centred approach. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 103–121.
   Google Scholar
• Kroski, E. (2008). All a Twitter. School Library Journal, 54, 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Leaver, T. (2012). Twittering informal learning and student engagement in first-year units. In A. Herrington, J. Schrape, & K. Singh (Eds.), Engaging students with learning technologies (pp. 97–110). Perth: Curtin University. Retrieved July 29, 2010, from http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=187379&custom_att_2=direct
   Google Scholar
• Mayberry, J., Hargis, J., Boles, L., Dugas, A., O’Neill, D., Rivera, A., & Meler, M. (2012). Exploring teaching and learning using an iTouch mobile device. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13, 203–217.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D. (1997). Interaction patterns of mixed sex groups in educational computer conferences. Part I – empirical findings. Gender and Education, 9, 345–363.
   Google Scholar
• McGill, L., Currier, S., Duncan, C., & Douglas, P. (2008). Good intentions: Improving the evidence base in support of sharing learning materials. Retrieved June 28, 2013, from http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/265/1/goodintentionspublic.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, G. (2012). Unravelling the social network: Theory and research. Learning, Media and Technology, 37, 4–19. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.567992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikoi, S. K., Rowlett, T., Armellini, A., & Witthaus, G. (2011). CORRE: A framework for evaluating and transforming teaching materials into open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 26, 191–207.
   Google Scholar
• Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities. Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcast, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Small, T. A. (2011). What the hashtag? Information, Communication & Society, 14, 872–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starbird, K., & Stamberger, J. (2010). Tweak the Tweet: Leveraging microblogging proliferation with a prescriptive syntax to support citizen reporting. In Proceedings of the 7th International ISCRAM Conference. Seattle, WA: Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. Retrieved August 4, 2013 from http://repository.cmu.edu/silicon_valley/41/
   Google Scholar
• Warren, S. J., & Wakefield, J. S. (2012). Learning and teaching as communicative actions: Social media as educational tool. In K. Seo (Ed.), Using social media effectively in the classroom: Blogs, wikis, Twitter, and more (pp. 98–113). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (2002). Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. In M. Tanabe, P. Besselaar, & T. Ishida (Eds.), Digital cities II: Computational and sociological approaches (pp. 10–25). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wetsch, L. R. (2012). Hootsuite university for higher education the ‘ultimate’ tool to assist you in teaching social media application. In B. A. Vander Schee (Ed.), Marketing Management Association 2012 Fall Educators’ Conference Proceedings (pp. 154–155). Minneapolis, MN: MMA.
   Google Scholar