A set of patterns for the structured design of MOOCs

References

• Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance Education, 34, 253–263.
   Google Scholar
• Baggaley, J. (2014). MOOC postscript. Distance Education, 35, 126–132.10.1080/01587919.2013.876142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, A. (1995). Technology, open learning and distance education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.). (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, A., & Finlay, J. (2006). Pattern languages in HCI: A critical review. Human-Computer Interaction, 21, 49–102.10.1207/s15327051hci2101_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearden, A., Finlay, J., Allgar, E., & McManus, B. (2002). Evaluating pattern languages in participatory design. In L. Terveen & D. Wixon (Eds.), CHI 2002, Conference extended abstracts on human factors in computer systems (pp. 664–665). Minneapolis, MN: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., & Sharples, M. (2014, September 16–19). Innovative pedagogy at massive scale: Teaching and learning in MOOCs. 9th European conference on technology enhanced learning (EC-TEL 2014): Open learning and teaching in educational communities, (pp. 98–111). Graz: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, R. P. (2002). Writer’s workshops and the work of making things. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., de Laat, M., & Lally, V. (2006). Using pattern languages to mediate theory-praxis conversations in design for networked learning. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 14, 211–223.10.1080/09687760600836977
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, S. (2013). The maturing of the MOOC: Literature review of massive open online courses and other forms of distance learning. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240193/13-1173-maturing-of-the-mooc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15, 133–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14, 202–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G., & Anderson, W. G. (2003). Handbook of distance learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Mor, Y. (2013). SNaP! Re-using, sharing and communicating designs and design knowledge using scenarios, narratives and patterns. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. L. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 189–200). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mor, Y., Mellar, H., Pachler, N., & Daly, C.(2011). Formative e-Assessment: Case stories, design patterns and future scenarios. In C. Kohls & J. Wedekind (Eds.), Investigations of e-learning patterns: Context factors, problems and solutions (pp. 199–219). Hershey, PA: Information Science. 10.4018/978-1-60960-144-7
   Google Scholar
• Mor, Y., & Mogilevsky, O. (2013). The learning design studio: Collaborative design inquiry as teachers’ professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 22054. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22054.
   Google Scholar
• Mor, Y., Warburton, S.,& Winters, N. (2012). Participatory pattern workshops: A methodology for open learning design inquiry. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 19197. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19197.
   Google Scholar
• Mor, Y., & Winters, N. (2007). Design approaches in technology enhanced learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 15, 61–75.10.1080/10494820601044236
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronen-Fuhrmann, T., Kali, Y., & Hoadley, C. (2008). Helping education students understand learning through designing. Educational Technology, 48, 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenney, S., Pieters, J., & de Vries, B. (2011). Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1235–1244.10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warburton, S. (2009). WP4c report on design patterns for virtual worlds. Retrieved February 17, 2015, from http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4424450/KCL_v6_MUVENATIONDesignPatternsWP4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Warburton, S., & Mor, Y. (2015). Double loop design: Configuring narratives, patterns and scenarios in the design of technology enhanced learning. In Y. Mor, M. Maina, & B. Craft (Eds.), The art and science of learning design (pp. 93–104). Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6300-103-8
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H., & Morris, L. (2007). Collaborative course development for online courses. Innovation in Higher Education, 32, 35–47.10.1007/s10755-006-9033-5
   Google Scholar