Individual and collaborative technology-mediated learning using question & answer online discussion forums – perceptions of Public Health learners in Dubai, UAE

References

• Bauer, J. F., & Anderson, R. S. (2000). Evaluating students’ written performance in the online classroom. In R. E. Weiss, D. S. Knowlton, & B. W. Speck (Eds.), Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom (pp. 65–72). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupchik, G. (2001). Constructivist realism: An ontology that encompasses positivist and constructivist approaches to the social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2[S.l.]. Retrieved August 3, 2015, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/968/2112
   Google Scholar
• Dawley, L. (2007). The tools for successful online teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 949–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2005). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers and Education, 46, 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson, M., Kuhlhorst, M., & Reiff, A. (2006). Creating effective online discussions: Optimal instructor and student roles. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10, 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Dringus, L. P., & Ellis, T. (2010). Temporal transitions in participation flow in an asynchronous discussion forum. Computers & Education, 54, 340–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer, L. (2006). Organizational learning, tacit information, and e-learning: A review. The Learning Organization, 13, 140–151.10.1108/09696470610645476
   Google Scholar
• Fourney, A., & Morris, M. R. (2013). Enhancing technical Q & A forums with citehistory. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved August 22, 2015, from http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/189365/citehistory_icwsm2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., & Wright, S. (2013). Discursive equality and everyday talk online: The impact of ‘superparticipants’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9, 625–642. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., & Bostrom, R. P. (2009). Technology-mediated learning: A comprehensive theoretical model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 686–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J., & Cipolla, C. (2014). Infographic: Why aren’t your students participating on the discussion board? eLearning knowledge blog. Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://knowledgeone.ca/blog/post/Infographic-Why-aren%E2%80%99t-your-students-participating-on-the-Discussion-Board.aspx?goback=%2Egde_102144_member_5829266422752120832#%21
   Google Scholar
• Moodle.org. (2014a). Moodle statistics page. Retrieved July 1, 2015, from https://moodle.org/stats/
   Google Scholar
• Moodle.org. (2014b). Moodle Forum posts. Retrieved July 1, 2015, from https://docs.moodle.org/22/en/Using_Forum
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed., p. 6). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Saadé, G. R. (2003). Web-based educational information system for enhanced learning, (EISEL): Student assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 267–277.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating. (2nd ed., p. 9). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers and Education, 46, 49–70.10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seufert, S. (2002). Cultural perspectives. In H. H. Adelsberger, J. M. Pawlowski, & B. Collis (Eds.), International handbooks on information systems (pp. 411–424). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, S. (2006). Deriving individual student marks from a tutor’s assessment of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 329–343.10.1080/02602930500352956
   Google Scholar
• Sunal, W. D., Sunal, S. C., Odell, R. M., & Sundberg, A. C. (2003). Research-supported best practices for developing online learning. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(1), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: Policy and Program Studies Service.
   Google Scholar
• van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270–279.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, J., Fielder, J., & Siragusa, L. (2013). Achieving better peer interaction in online discussion forums: A reflective practitioner case study. Issues in Educational Research, 23, 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Journal of Higher Education, 45, 471–501.
   Google Scholar