Advanced search
Publication Cover
Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning Volume 35, 2020 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
3,249
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The cathedral’s ivory tower and the open education bazaar – catalyzing innovation in the higher education sector

Eyal Rabina Faculty Management, Science and Technology, The Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands;b Department of Psychology and Education, The Open University of Israel, Raanana, IsraelCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Yoram M Kalmanc Department of Management and Economics, The Open University of Israel, Raanana, IsraelView further author information
&
Marco Kalza Faculty Management, Science and Technology, The Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands;d Faculty of Cultural Sciences and Humanities, Heidelberg University of Education, Heidelberg, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1471-5827View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 82-99 | Published online: 09 Sep 2019

References

  • Anderson, C. (2009). Free: The past and future of a radical price. New York, NY: Hyperion.
  • Baraniuk, R. (2008). Challenges and opportunities for the open education movement: A Connexions case study. In T. Liyoshi & M. S. Vijay Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education (pp. 229–246). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bates, A. W. T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning for a digital age [BC Open Textbooks]. Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieved from. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
  • Bates, T. (2013, February 14). Harvard’s current thinking on MOOCs. Retrieved from https://www.tonybates.ca/2013/02/14/harvards-current-thinking-on-moocs/
  • Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach.  Duke Center for Instructional Technology. Retrieved from http://onlinecourses.duke.edu/
  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Bergek, A., Berggren, C., Magnusson, T., & Hobday, M. (2013). Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? Research Policy, 42(6–7), 1210–1224.
  • Bezroukov, N. (1999a). A second look at the cathedral and the bazaar. First Monday, 4(12).
  • Bezroukov, N. (1999b). Open source software development as a special type of academic research: Critique of vulgar Raymondism. First Monday, 4(10). Retrieved from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/696
  • Blessinger, P., & Bliss, T. J. (2016). Open education: International perspectives in higher education. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.
  • Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., & Wiley, D. (2008). Open educational resources: Enabling universal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/469/1001
  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2014). New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., Caldera, L., & Soares, L. (2011). Disrupting college: How disruptive innovation can deliver quality and affordability to postsecondary education. Innosight Institute.
  • Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2011). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for? London: Penguin UK.
  • Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2014). Open innovation and within-industry diversification in small and medium enterprises: The case of open source software firms. Research Policy, 43(5), 891–902.
  • Conole, G. (2012). Integrating OER into open educational practices. In J. Glennie, K. Harley, N. Butcher, & T. van Wyk (Eds.), Open educational resources and change in higher education: Reflections from practice (pp. 111–124). Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.
  • Costello, E. (2014). Participatory practices in open source educational software – The case of the moodle bug tracker community (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.tara.tcd.ie/handle/2262/71751
  • Craig, R. (2015). College disrupted: The great unbundling of higher education. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
  • De Langen, F. H. T. (2013). Strategies for sustainable business models for open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(2), 53–66.
  • Economist Intelligence Unit. (2015). Connecting universities: Future models of higher education. British Council. London, UK.
  • Farrow, R. (2017). Open education and critical pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146.
  • Finley, K. (2015, September). Open sourcing is no longer optional, not even for Apple. Wired.
  • Fitzgerald, B. (2006). The transformation of open source software. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 587–598.
  • Fredin, E. (2018, April 2). First blockchain university promises to be the Uber for Students and AirBnB for teachers. Retrieved from https://observatory.tec.mx/edu-news/first-blockchain-university-promises-to-be-the-uber-for-students-and-the-airbnb-for-teachers
  • Greco, A. N., & Wharton, R. M. (2008, June). Should university presses adopt an open access [electronic publishing] business model for all of their scholarly books? In L. Chan & S. Mornati (Eds.) ELPUB 2008. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing (pp. 149–164). Toronto, Canada. Retrieved from https://elpub.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/149_elpub2008.content.pdf
  • Hammond, T., Danko, K., & Braswell, M. (2015). U.S. accounting professors’ perspectives on textbook revisions. Journal of Accounting Education, 33(3), 198–218.
  • Hansen, J. D., & Reich, J. (2015). Democratizing education? Examining access and usage patterns in massive open online courses. Science, 350(6265), 1245–1248.
  • Henderikx, M. A., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017). Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention-behavior gap. Distance Education, 38(3), 353–368.
  • Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008, December). Reinventing your business model. In Harvard business review (pp. 59–68).
  • Kalman, Y. M. (2014). A race to the bottom: MOOCs and higher education business models. Open Learning: the Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 5–14.
  • Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., Walhout, J., Castaño-Munoz, J., Espasa, A., & Tovar, E. (2015). Setting-up a European cross provider data collection on open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2150
  • Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses: In depth. Educause Review, 48(3), 62–63.
  • Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Hatala, M. (2015). What public media reveals about MOOCs: A systematic analysis of news reports. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 510–527.
  • Loeckx, J. (2016). Blurring boundaries in education: Context and impact of MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2395
  • Lohr, S. (2018, October 28). IBM to buy red hat, the top linux distributor, for $34 billion. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/28/business/ibm-red-hat-cloud-computing.html
  • Macfarlane, B. (2011). The morphing of academic practice: Unbundling and the rise of the para-academic. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59–73.
  • Marszal, A. (2012, December 14). UK universities to launch free degree-style online courses. The Telegraph. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9743703/UK-universities-to-launch-free-degree-style-online-courses.html
  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Morris, L. V. (2013). MOOCs, Emerging Technologies, and Quality. Innovative Higher Education, 38(4), 251–252.
  • Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital age. MIS Quarterly, 41(1).
  • Noam, E. M. (1996). Electronics and the dim future of the university. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 22(5), 6–9.
  • Orr, D., Weller, M., & Farrow, R. (2018). Models for online, open, flexible and technology enhanced higher education across the globe – A comparative analysis. (Final Report). Oslo: International Council for Open and Distance Education. Retrieved from https://icde.memberclicks.net/assets/RESOURCES/Models-report-April-2018_final.pdf
  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Raymond, E. S. (1999). The cathedral & the bazaar: Musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
  • Read, M. (2011). Cultural and organizational drivers of open educational content. In R. Katz (Ed.), The tower and the cloud. Higher education in the age of cloud computing (pp. 140–149). EDUCAUSE. Retrived from https://jornalggn.com.br/sites/default/files/documentos/the_tower_and_the_cloud.pdf#page=162
  • Reich, J. (2014). MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent. EDUCAUSE Review Online.
  • Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Samuelson, P. (2006). IBM’s pragmatic embrace of open source. Communications of the ACM, 49(10), 21–25.
  • van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2011). Getting the Data. In Process Mining (pp. 95–123). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Vaughan-Nichols, S. J. (2016, June). Why Microsoft is turning into an open-source company. ZDNet.
  • Vaughan-Nichols, S. J. (2018). Why IBM bought Red Hat: It’s all open souce cloud, all the time. ZDNet. Retrieved from https://www.zdnet.com/article/why-ibm-bought-red-hat-its-all-open-source-cloud-all-the-time/
  • Weller, M. (2015). MOOCs and the silicon valley narrative. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2015(1). doi:10.5334/jime.am
  • West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831.
  • West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, 36(3), 319–331.
  • Wilby, P. (2018, January 9). A visionary to save the Open University – Or the man who will run it into the ground? The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/jan/09/save-open-university-peter-horrocks-changing
  • Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and disruptive innovation: Implications for higher education. ELearning Papers, 33. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.422.5536&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.