The effectiveness of e-tutoring in an open and distance e-learning environment: evidence from the university of south africa

References

• Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Online and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890/1663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
   Google Scholar
• Bear, S., & Jones, G. (2017). Students as protégés: Factors that lead to success. Journal of Management Education, 41(1), 146–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binns, C. (2017). Module design in a changing era of higher education: Academic identity, cognitive dissonance and institutional barriers. London, UK: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, C. F., Liao, C. J., Walters, B. G., & Lee, C. Y. (2016). Measuring the morale reasoning competencies of service-learning e-tutors. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chih-Yuan Sun, J., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• De Metz, N., & Bezuidenhout, A. (2018). An importance-competence analysis of the roles and competencies of e-tutors at an open distance learning institution. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleckhammer, L., & Wise, L. Z. 2011. The role of tutors in facilitating online student engagement. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown, & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing demands, changing directions. Hobart, Australia: Proceedings ascilite, 4–7 December 2011,392–397. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs/Fleckhammer-concise.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. (2003). Learning design and e-learning. Brighton: Epic Group plc.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2/3), 87−105.
   Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. (2012). Learning Theory and Online Technologies. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, M. A. F., Rodríguez, E. M., & Vidal, L. I. E. (2017). The tutor’s role and functions in online education. Qualitative study within the context of worker training. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 237, 196–202.
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, V., Majumdar, M., & Kishore, K. (2012). Mentoring: A differentiating factor in management education business. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research, 1(2), 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Klimova, B. F., & Poulova, P. (2011). Tutor as an important e-learning support. Procedia - Computer Science, 3, 1485–1489.
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, B., Matteucci, M. C., & Tomasetto, C. (2012). E-tutorial support for collaborative online learning: An explorative study on experienced and inexperienced e-tutors. Computers and Education, 58, 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasnova, T., & Demeshko, M. (2015). Tutor-mediated support in blended learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 166, 404–408.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriaki, A. (2009). Promoting good practice in learning, teaching and assessment in higher education. A Journal of E-Learning and Teaching, 2, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeBay, D. G., & Comm, C. L. (2004). Student expectations regarding online learning: Implications for distance learning programs. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 1, 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., & Irby, B. (2008). An overview of online education: Attractiveness, benefits, challenges, concerns and recommendations. College Student Journal, 42, 449–458.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (Vol. 1, pp. 22–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nsamba, A. N. (2016). Exploring the quality of students’ support services in distance learning environments (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of South Africa, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Ntuli, C. H. S. (2016). Tutors’ perceptions of effective facilitation through the use of an integrated tutor model (ITM) in an open and distance learning (ODL) environment, (Unpublished MA thesis). Unisa, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, B., & McFadden, C. (2009). Attrition in online and campus degree programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(2), 1–9. https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer122/patterson112.html
   Google Scholar
• Pitsoane, E., Mahlo, D., & Lethole, P. (2017). Unisa E-tutors’ perceptions, experiences and views of active learning. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(1), Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadatmand, M., Hedberg, M., Abjornsson, L., & Kvarnstrom, M. (2017). Examining learners’ interaction in an open online course through the community of inquiry framework. European Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning, 20(1), EDEN, 61–79.
   Google Scholar
• Salkind, N. J. ( 8th ed.). (2012). Exploring research. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Segoe, B. (2014). Tutor support in an open distance learning (ODL) environment for upgrading teachers. Kamla-Raj, 48(1), 161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Sulčič, V., & Sulčič, A. (2007). Can online tutors improve the quality of e-learning? Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 4, 201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2010). Teaching and learning in post-industrial distance education. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. 113–114). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2010). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, A. (2014). From place to virtual space: Reconfiguring student support for distance and e-learning in the digital age. Open Praxis, 6(1), 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, A. (2015). Student success in open, distance and e-learning. The ICDE reports series. International Council for Open and DistanceEducation.https://www.icde.org/assets/WHAT_WE_DO/studentsuccess.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Unisa. (2018). Learner support. http://www.unisa.ac.za/sites/myunisa/default/Learner-support-&-regions/Tuition-Support/Tutorial-Support-Services
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/
   Google Scholar
• Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to drop out of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115–127.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar