1,174
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Trick or treat: new ecology of education accountability system in the USA

Pages 73-93 | Received 15 Jun 2009, Accepted 13 Sep 2009, Published online: 26 Jan 2010

References

  • AIR (American Institutes for Research) . . No Child Left Behind in 2004: Results from the National Longitudinal Study of NCLB and Study of State Implementation of NCLB . Symposium papers presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association . April , San Francisco, CA.
  • Carnoy , M. and Loeb , S. 2002 . Does external accountability affect student outcomes? . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 24 ( 4 ) : 305 – 31 .
  • Carnoy , M. , Loeb , S. and Smith , T. 2001 . Do higher scores in Texas make for better high school outcomes? CPRE Research Report No. RR‐047 , Philadelphia, PA : Consortium for Policy Research in Education .
  • CCSSO (Council of Chief State School Officers) . 2008 . Schools identified for improvement, or not making AYP, by state: 2007‐08 http://www.ccsso.org (accessed September 7, 2009)
  • Center on Education Policy . 2006 . From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act , Washington, DC : CEP . http://www.cep-dc.org (accessed May 15, 2006)
  • Center on Education Policy . 2007 . Has student achievement increased since 2002? State test score trends through 2006–2007 , Washington, DC : CEP . http://www.cep-dc.org (accessed December 12, 2008)
  • Communities for Quality Education . 2008 . Tracking state actions to fix & fund NCLB www.qualityednow.org (accessed December 5, 2008)
  • Cohen , J. 1988 . Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences , (2nd ed.) , Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
  • Costrell , R. and Peyser , J. 2004 . Exploring the costs of accountability: No Child Left Behind is no unfunded mandate . Education Next , 4 ( 2 ) www.educationnext.org (accessed December 1, 2008)
  • Cronin , J. , Dahlin , M. , Adkins , D. and Kingsury , G.G. 2007 . The proficiency illusion Thomas B. Fordham Institute report. http://www.edexcellence.net (accessed December 1, 2008)
  • Cuban , L. 1990 . Reforming again, again, and again . Educational Researcher , 19 ( 1 ) : 3 – 13 .
  • Cuban , L. 1992 . What happens to reforms that last? The case of the junior high school . American Educational Research Journal , 29 ( 2 ) : 227 – 51 .
  • Davis , M.R. 2006 . Ed. Dept. to weigh NCLB subgroup issues . Education Week , http://www.edweek.org (accessed November 8, 2006)
  • Duffett , A. , Farkas , S. and Loveless , T. 2008 . High‐achieving students in the era of No Child Left Behind Thomas B. Fordham Institute report. http://www.edexcellence.net/ (accessed December 1, 2008)
  • Education Commission of the States . 2007 . NCLB database http://nclb2.ecs.org/NCLBSURVEY/nclb.aspx?Target=AD (accessed September 1, 2007)
  • Education Trust . 2004 . Measured progress: Achievement rises and gaps narrow, but too slowly , Washington, DC : Education Trust .
  • Education Trust . 2006 . Primary progress, secondary challenge: A state‐by‐state look at student achievement patterns , Washington, DC : Education Trust .
  • Education Week . 1999 . Quality counts '99: Rewarding results, punishing failure January. http://www.edweek.com (accessed September 10, 2001)
  • Education Week . 2004 . AYP status . www.edweek.org (accessed September 1, 2007)
  • Education Week . 2005 . No small change . http://www.edweek.com (accessed March 10, 2005)
  • Education Week . 2006 . Preliminary NCLB results show slippage in 2006 . www.edweek.org (accessed September 1, 2007)
  • Elazar , D.J. 1962 . The American partnership , Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
  • Erpenbarch , W.J. , Forte‐Fast , E. and Potts , A. 2003 . Statewide educational accountability under NCLB: Central issues arising from an examination of state accountability workbooks and U.S. Department of Education reviews under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 , Washington, DC : Council of Chief State School Officers .
  • Firestone , W.A. 1990 . “ Continuity and incrementalism after all: State responses to the excellence movement ” . In The education reform movement of the 1980s: Perspectives and cases , Edited by: Murphy , J. 143 – 66 . Berkeley, CA : McCutchan .
  • Firestone , W.A. , Fuhrman , S. and Kirst , M.W. 1989 . The progress of reform: An appraisal of state education initiatives , New Brunswick, NJ : Center for Policy Research in Education .
  • Fuhrman , S.H. 1988 . “ State politics and educational reform ” . In Politics of reforming school administration , Edited by: Fuhrman , S.H. , Hannaway , J. and Crowson , R. 61 – 75 . New York : Falmer Press .
  • Fuller , B. , Gesicki , K. , Kang , E. and Wright , J. 2006 . Is the No Child Left Behind Act working? The reliability of how states track achievement , University of California, Berkeley . PACE Working paper 06‐1
  • Goertz , M.E. and Duffy , M.E. 2001 . Assessment and accountability systems in the 50 states: 1999–2000 , Philadelphia, PA : Consortium for Policy Research in Education . CPRE Research Report RR‐046
  • Grissmer , D. and Flanagan , A. 1998 . Exploring rapid achievement gains in North Carolina and Texas , Washington, DC : National Education Goals Panel .
  • Grissmer , D. , Flanagan , A. , Kawata , J. and Williamson , S. 2000 . Improving student achievement: What state NAEP test scores tell us , Santa Monica, CA : Rand .
  • Hair , J.F. , Anderson , R.E. , Tatham , R.L. and Black . 1998 . Multivariate data analysis, , 5th ed. , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall .
  • Haney , W. 2000 . The myth of the Texas miracle in education . Educational Policy Analysis Archives , 8 ( 19 ) http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41 (accessed March 3, 2001)
  • Hanushek , E.A. and Raymond , M.E. 2004 . Does school accountability lead to improved performance? . Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 24 ( 2 ) : 297 – 327 .
  • Hoxby , C.M. 2002 . The cost of accountability. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8855 , Cambridge, MA : National Bureau of Economic Research . http://www.nber.org/papers/w8855 (accessed September 10, 2003)
  • Kim , J. and Sunderman , G.L. 2004 . Large mandates and limited resources: State response to the No Child Left Behind Act and implications for accountability , Cambridge, MA : The Civil Rights Project at Harvard .
  • Kirst , M.W. 1995 . Recent research on intergovernmental relations in education policy . Educational Researcher , 24 ( 9 ) : 18 – 22 .
  • Klein , S.P. , Hamilton , L.S. , McCaffrey , D.F. and Stecher , B.M. 2000 . What do test scores in Texas tell us? , Santa Monica, CA : Rand .
  • Kline , R.B. 2005 . Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, , 2nd ed. , New York : Guilford Press .
  • Koretz , D. and Barron , S.I. 1998 . The validity of gains on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS) (MR‐792‐PCT/FF) , Santa Monica, CA : Rand .
  • Ladd , H.F. 1999 . The Dallas school accountability and incentive program: An evaluation of its impact on student outcomes . Economics of Education Review , 18 : 1 – 16 .
  • Lee , J. 1997 . State activism in education reform: Applying the Rasch model to measure trends and examine policy coherence . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 19 ( 1 ) : 29 – 43 .
  • Lee , J. 2004 . How feasible is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? Simulations of school AYP ‘Uniform Averaging’ and ‘Safe Harbor’ under the No Child Left Behind Act . Education Policy Analysis Archives [Online] , 12 ( 14 ) http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n14/ (accessed January 10, 2005)
  • Lee , J. 2006 . Tracking achievement gaps and assessing the impact of NCLB on the gaps: An in‐depth look into national and state reading and math outcome trends , Cambridge, MA : The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University .
  • Lee , J. 2007 . Do national and state assessments converge for educational accountability? A meta‐analytic synthesis of multiple measures in Maine and Kentucky . Applied Measurement in Education , 20 ( 2 ) : 1 – 33 .
  • Lee , J. 2008 . Is test‐driven external accountability effective? Synthesizing the evidence from cross‐state causal‐comparative and correlational studies . Review of Educational Research , 78 ( 3 ) : 608 – 44 .
  • Lee , J. and Wong , K.K. 2004 . The impact of accountability on racial and socioeconomic equity: Considering both school resources and achievement outcomes . American Educational Research Journal , 41 ( 4 ) : 797 – 832 .
  • LeFloch , K.C. , Martinez , F. , O’Day , J. , Stecher , B. , Taylor , J. and Cook , A. 2007 . State and local implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act Volume III – Accountability under NCLB: Interim report , Washington, DC : US DOE .
  • Levin , B. 2001 . Reforming education: From origins to outcomes , London : RoutledgeFalmer .
  • Linn , R.L. 2000 . Assessments and accountability . Educational Researcher , 2 ( 29 ) : 4 – 16 .
  • Linn , R.L. 2003 . Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations . Educational Researcher , 32 ( 7 ) : 3 – 13 .
  • Linn , R.L. , Baker , E.L. and Betebenner , D.W. 2002 . Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 . Educational Researcher , 31 ( 6 ) : 3 – 16 .
  • Marion , S.F. , White , C. , Carlson , D. , Erpenbach , W.J. , Rabinowitz , S. and Sheinker , J. 2002 . Making valid and reliable decisions in the determination of adequate yearly progress , Washington, DC : Council of Chief State School Officers . A paper in the Series: Implementing the state accountability system requirements under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
  • Mathis , W.J. 2003 . No Child Left Behind: Costs and benefits . Phi Delta Kappan , 84 ( 9 ) : 679 – 86 . http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k0305mat.htm (accessed 16 March, 2003)
  • Mazzoni , T.L. 1993 . The changing politics of state education policy making: A 20 Year Minnesota perspective . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 15 : 356 – 79 .
  • McLaughlin , M. 1976 . “ Implementation as mutual adaptation: Change in classroom organization ” . In Social program implementation , Edited by: Williams , W. and Elmore , F. 531 – 66 . New York : Academic Press .
  • Meyer , J.W. and Rowan , B. 1978 . “ The structure of educational organizations ” . In Environments and organizations , Edited by: Meyer , M.W. and Associates . San Francisco, CA : Jossey‐Bass .
  • Mills , J.I. 2008 . A legislative overview of No Child Left Behind . New Directions for Evaluation , 117 : 9 – 20 .
  • Mintrop , H. and Trujillo , T.M. 2005 . Corrective action in low performing schools: Lessons for NCLB implementation from first‐generation accountability systems . Education Policy Analysis Archives , 13 ( 48 ) http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n48/ (accessed December 15, 2005)
  • NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) . 2005 . Moving from rhetoric to reality in opening doors to higher education for African‐American students , New York : NAACP .
  • National Conference of State Legislatures . . Memorandum on NCLB mandates and their related legal issues . July 7 . Washington, DC : NCSL . www.ncsl.org (accessed September 1, 2007)
  • NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) . 2007 . Mapping 2005 state proficiency standards onto the NAEP scales , Washington, DC : US Government Printing Office . NCES 2007–482
  • NCLB . 2001 . No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Public Law No. 107–10, enacted on January 8, 2002
  • NCREL/CCSSO (North Central Regional Education Laboratory/Council of Chief State School Officers) . 1996 . State assessment program database , Oak Brook, IL : NCREL .
  • NSBA (National School Boards Association) . 2006 . Federal funding for education , Alexandria, VA : NSBA .
  • Olson , L. 2002 . ‘Inadequate’ yearly gains are predicted . Education Week , http://www.edweek.org (accessed April 30, 2002)
  • Padilla , C. , Skolnik , H. , Lopez‐Torkos , A. , Woodworth , K. , Lash , A. , Shields , P.A. , Laguarda , K.G. and David , J.L. 2006 . Title I accountability and school improvement from 2001 to 2004 , Washington, DC : US Department of Education .
  • Peterson , P.E. 1976 . School politics: Chicago style , Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
  • Peterson , P.E. , Rabe , B. and Wong , K. 1986 . When federalism works , Washington, DC : Brookings Institution .
  • Phelps , R. , ed. 2005 . Defending standardized tests , Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
  • Popham , J.W. 2004 . America’s ‘failing’ schools: How parents and teachers can cope with NCLB , London : RoutledgeFalmer .
  • Porter , A. and Chester , M. 2002 . “ Building a high‐quality assessment and accountability program: The Philadelphia example ” . In Brookings papers on education policy , Edited by: Ravitch , D. 285 – 315 . Washington, DC : Brookings Institution .
  • Preskill , H. and Torres , R.T. 1999 . Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
  • Rosenthal , D.B. and Hoefler , J.M. 1989 . Competing approaches to the study of American federalism and intergovernmental relations . Publius: The Journal of Federalism , 19 ( 1 ) : 1 – 24 .
  • Rothstein , R. , Jacobsen , R. and Wilder , T. . ‘Proficiency for all’ – An oxymoron . Paper prepared for the Symposium, ‘Examining America’s Commitment to Closing Achievement Gaps: NCLB and Its Alternatives,’ . November 13–14 . Teachers College, Columbia University . http://devweb.tc.columbia.edu (accessed September 7, 2009)
  • Rowan , B. 1982 . Organizational structure and the institutional environment: The case of public schools . Administrative Science Quarterly , 27 : 259 – 79 .
  • Rowan , B. and Miskel , C.G. 1999 . “ Institutional theory and the study of educational organizations ” . In Handbook of research on educational administration , Edited by: Murphy , J. and Louis , K.S. 359 – 84 . San Francisco, CA : Jossey‐Bass .
  • Skrla , L. , Scheurich , J.J. , Johnson , J.F. and Koschoreck , J.W. 2004 . “ Accountability for equity: Can state policy leverage social justice? ” . In Educational equity and accountability: Paradigms, policies, and politics , Edited by: Skrla , L. and Scheurich , J.J. 51 – 78 . New York, NY : RoutledgeFalmer .
  • Smith , M.L. , Heinecke , W. and Noble , A.J. 1999 . Assessment policy and political spectacle . Teachers College Record , 101 ( 2 ) : 157 – 91 .
  • Sunderman , G.L. , ed. 2008 . The NCLB challenge: Achieving accountability, equity and school reform , Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press .
  • Sunderman , G.L. , Kim , J.S. and Orfield , G. 2005 . NCLB meets school realities: Lessons from the field , Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press .
  • Thompson , T.G. and Barnes , R.E. 2007 . Beyond NCLB: Fulfilling the promise to our nation’s schools. Report of the commission on No Child Left Behind , Washington, DC : Aspen Institute .
  • US GAO (US Government Accounting Office) . 2003 . Title I: Characteristics of tests will influence expenses; information sharing may help states realize efficiencies , Washington, DC : US GAO . GAO Publication No. 03‐815
  • Valencia , R.R. , Valenzuela , A. , Sloan , K. and Foley , D. 2004 . “ Let’s treat the cause, not the symptoms: Equity and accountability in Texas revisited ” . In Educational equity and accountability: Paradigms, policies, and politics , Edited by: Skrla , L. and Scheurich , J.J. 29 – 38 . New York, NY : RoutledgeFalmer . Chap. 3
  • Zimmer , R. , Gill , B. , Razquin , P. , Booker , K. and Lockwood III , J.R. 2007 . State and local implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act Volume I – Title I school choice, supplemental educational services, and student achievement , Washington, DC : US DOE .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.