Access to academic curriculum in Australian secondary schools: a case study of a highly marketised education system

References

• ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2011. Schools, Australia, 2010, Cat. No. 4221.0. Canberra: ABS.
   Google Scholar
• Alegre, M. À., and G. Ferrer. 2010. “School Regimes and Education Equity: Some Insights Based on PISA 2006.” British Educational Research Journal 36 (3): 433–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angus, M. 2003. “School Choice Policies in Australia.” In Choosing Choice, edited by D. N. Plank and G. Sykes, 112–142. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2010. Skills Shortages, Australia. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Australian National Audit Office. 2004. “Specific Purpose Payments: General Recurrent Grants for Government Schools.” Accessed May 29, 2013. http://www.anao.gov.au/Publications/Audit-Reports/2007-2008/Specific-Purpose-PaymentsGeneral-Recurrent-Grants-for-Government-Schools/Audit-brochure
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2003. Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Class and Social Advantage. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., and D. Youdell. 2008. Hidden Privatisation in Public Education. Brussels: Education International.
   Google Scholar
• Beavis, A. 2004. Why Parents Choose Public or Private Schools. Canberra: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. H. 1999. “The Political Economy of Educational Reform in Australia, England and Wales, and the United States.” In Comparative Education: the Dialectic of the Global and the Local, edited by R. Arnove and C. A. Torres, 257–282. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. 2nd ed. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, W. L. 1987. “Balancing Public and Private Schools: The Australian Experience and American Implications.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9 (3): 183–198.
   Google Scholar
• Bunar, N. 2010. “Choosing for Quality or Inequality: Current Perspectives on the Implementation of School Choice Policy in Sweden.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., L. Lavery, and J. F. Witte. 2011. “The Determinants of Interdistrict Open Enrollment Flows.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 33 (1): 76–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. E., and T. M. Moe. 1990. Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2007. Becoming an Australian Citizen. Accessed November 14, 2012. http://www.citizenship.gov.au/learn/cit_test/_pdf/citz-booklet-full-ver.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, B., S. J. Ingels, J. Downing, and R. Bozick. 2007. Advanced Mathematics and Science Coursetaking in the Spring High School Senior Classes of 1982, 1992, and 2004 (NCES 2007–312). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2008. Educational Quality and Equality: The Ongoing Challenge to Secure a Right to Learn. Accessed October 15, 2011. http://edpolicy.stanford.edu/pages/events/kerner/materials/right_to_learn_kerner.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1944. Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. 2006. “Competition, Specialisation and Stratification: Academic Outcomes of the Government School System in Melbourne, Australia.” Paper presented at the Comparative Education Society in Europe, Granada, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Elsworth, G. R. 1998. “School Size and Diversity in the Senior Secondary Curriculum: A Generalisable Relationship?” Australian Journal of Education 42 (2): 183–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S., S. J. Ball, and R. Bowe. 1995. Markets, Choice and Equity in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillard, J. 2010. “A Future Fair for All – School Funding in Australia – Address to the Sydney Institute.” Accessed June 12, 2013. http://ministers.deewr.gov.au/gillard/future-fair-all-school-funding-australia-address-sydney-institute
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., and P. Noden. 2003. “Modelling Social Segregation.” Oxford Review of Education 29 (2): 225–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonski, D., K. Boston, K. Greiner, C. Lawrence, B. Scales, and P. Tannock. 2011. Review of Funding for Schooling – Final Report. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, M. 2011. Australian Government Funding for Schools Explained. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• James, R. 2001. “Participation Disadvantage in Australian Higher Education: An Analysis of Some Effects of Geographical Location and Socioeconomic Status.” Higher Education 42 (4): 455–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. D., B. E. Vanfossen, and M. E. Ensminger. 1995. “Individual and Organizational Predictors of High School Track Placement.” Sociology of Education 68 (4): 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, S., C. Felix, G. Ledoux, W. Meijnen, J. Roeleveld, and E. van Schooten. 2006. “Choosing Segregation or Integration? The Extent and Effects of Ethnic Segregation in Dutch Cities.” Education and Urban Society 38 (2): 228–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronman, A. T. 2007. Education’s End: Why Our Colleges and Universities Have given up on the Meaning of Life. New Have, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, S. 2007. “School Reform and Inequality in Urban Australia: A Case of Residualising the Poor.” In International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy, edited by R. Teese, S. Lamb and M. Duru-Belat, 1–38. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, S., D. Hogan, and T. Johnson. 2001. “The Stratification of Learning Opportunities and Achievement in Tasmanian Secondary Schools.” The Australian Journal of Education 45 (2): 153–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauder, H., and D. Hughes. 1999. Trading in Futures: Why Markets in Education don’t Work. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., T. K. Chow-Hoy, D. T. Burkam, D. Geverdt, and B. A. Smerdon. 1998. “Sector Differences in High School Course Taking: A Private School or Catholic School Effect?” Sociology of Education 71 (4): 314–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., B. A. Smerdon, C. Alfeld-Liro, and S. L. Brown. 2000. “Inside Large and Small High Schools: Curriculum and Social Relations.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22 (2): 147–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and D. Jantzi. 2009. “A Review of Empirical Evidence about School Size Effects: A Policy Perspective.” Review of Educational Research 79 (1): 464–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. 2003. “Innovation in Education Markets: Theory and Evidence on the Impact of Competition and Choice in Charter Schools.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (2): 395–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. 2005. “Public Schools in Marketized Environments: Shifting Incentives and Unintended Consequences of Competition-Based Educational Reforms.” American Journal of Education 111: 464–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C., L. Gordon, and J. Lee. 2012. “Self-managing Schools and Access for Disadvantaged Students: Organizational Behaviour and School Admissions in New Zealand.” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Matear, A. 2006. “Equity in Education in Chile: The Tensions Between Policy and Practice.” International Journal of Educational Development 27 (1): 101–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, W. W. 2002. Education and Development: Measuring the Social Benefits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, M., and S. Grime. 1999. The Achievement Gap in the San Diego City Schools. La Jolla, CA: The San Diego Dialogue.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. 2008. National Report on Schooling in Australia 2008: Additional Statistics on Australian Schooling. Canberra: MCEETYA. Accessed September 30, 2013. http://cms.curriculum.edu.au/anr2008/pdfs/anr2008_Statistics_16%E2%80%908%E2%80%9010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Monk, D. H., and E. J. Haller. 1993. “Predictors of High School Academic Course Offerings: The Role of School Size.” American Educational Research Journal 30 (1): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. 1990. Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2004. What Makes School Systems Perform? Seeing School Systems through the Prism of PISA. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming Social Background – Equity in Learning Opportunities and Outcomes. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Polesel, J. 2008. “Democratising the Curriculum or Training the Children of the Poor: School-based Vocational Training in Australia.” Journal of Education Policy 23 (6): 615–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. 2008. “Curriculum Availability, Variations, and their Implications Across U.S. High Schools.” Unpublished Senior Honours Thesis, Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, S. 2003. “The Changing Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement: Recent Evidence from Australia.” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Rumberger, R. W., and S. L. Thomas. January 2000. “The Distribution of Dropout and Turnover Rates Among Urban and Suburban High Schools.” Sociology of Education 73: 39–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. 2011. Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• School Curriculum and Standards Authority, Government of Western Australia. 2012. “Course Summary.” Accessed November 7, 2012. http://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/internet/Senior_Secondary/Courses/WACE_Courses/Mathematics?1352263916376 and http://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/internet/Senior_Secondary/Courses/WACE_Courses/Mathematics_Specialist
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, E., and C. Hannan. 2006. “School Effects and Subject Choice: The Uptake of Scientific Subjects in Ireland.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 17 (3): 303–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spade, J. Z., L. Columba, and B. E. Vanfossen. 1997. “Tracking in Mathematics and Science: Courses and Course-Selection Procedures.” Sociology of Education 70 (2): 108–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. 2008. “Outreach and Social Inclusion, Outreach for Social Inclusion.” Paper presented at the Go8/DEEWR Forum. Accessed January 20, 2012. http://www.go8.edu.au/__documents/university-staff/events/2008/social-inclusion/ann_stewart_outreach_and_social_inclusion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Teese, R. 2007. “Stuctural Inequality in Australian Education.” In International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy, edited by R. Teese, S. Lamb and M. Duru-Bellat, 39–62. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Teese, R., and J. Polesel. 2003. Undemocratic Schooling: Equity and Quality in Mass Secondary Education in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., L. De Bortoli, M. Nicholas, K. Hillman, and S. Buckley. 2011. Challenges for Australian Education: Results from PISA 2009. Camberwell, VI: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Walford, G. 2003. “School Choice and Educational Change in England and Wales.” In Choosing Choice: School Choice in International Perspective, edited by D. N. Plank and G. Sykes, 68–91. New York: Teachers College Press . 68-91.
   Google Scholar
• Waslander, S., and M. Thrupp. 1995. “Choice, Competition and Segregation: An Empirical Analysis of a New Zealand Secondary School Market, 1990–93.” Journal of Education Policy 10 (1): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, L., and C. Ryan. 2010. “Choosers and Losers: The Impact of Government Subsidies on Australian Secondary Schools.” Australian Journal of Education 54 (1): 86–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, G., and S. Power. 2000. “Marketization and Privatization in Mass Education Systems.” International Journal of Educational Development 20: 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar