Situating subjectivities in the macrosocial policy context: critical/queer multifocal policy research

References

• Alexander, B. K. 2018. “Queer/quare Theory: Worldmaking and Methodologies.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 275–307. (5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 1995. “Intellectuals or Technicians? the Urgent Role of Theory in Educational Studies.” British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (3): 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2006. Education Policy and Social Class: The Selected Works of Stephen J. Ball. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2015. “Education, Governance and the Tyranny of Numbers.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (3): 299–301. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1013271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2012. How Schools Do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchstein, H., and D. Jörke. 2012. “The Argumentative Turn toward Deliberative Democracy: Habermas’s Contribution to the Foucauldian Critique.” In The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy As Communicative Practice, edited by F. Fischer and H. Gottweis, 271–304. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burford, J. 2015. “Queerying The Affective Politics Of Doctoral Education: toward Complex Visions Of Agency and Affect.” Higher Education Research & Development 34 (4): 776-787. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1051005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burford, J. 2018. “The Trouble with Doctoral Aspiration Now.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 31 (6): 487–503. doi:10.1080/09518398.2017.1422287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canales, G. 2013. “Transformative, Mixed Methods Checklist for Psychological Research with Mexican Americans.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 7 (1): 6–21. doi:10.1177/1558689812446022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, B. W., and C. Brewer. 2014. “The Implicated Advocate: The Discursive Construction of the Democratic Practices of School Principals in the USA.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 35 (2): 294–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carspecken, F. P. 1996. Critical Ethnography in Educational Research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Code, L. 1993. “Taking Subjectivity Into Account.” In Feminist Epistemologies, edited by L. Alcoff and E. Potter, 15-48. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Covarrubias, A., P. E. Nava, A. Lara, R. Burciaga, V. N. Vélez, and D. G. Solorzano. 2018. “Critical Race Quantitative Intersections: A Testimonio Analysis.” Race Ethnicity and Education 21 (2): 253–273. doi:10.1080/13613324.2017.1377412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and J. D. Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A. J. 2009. “Rigid Response in an Age of Accountability: The Potential of Leadership and Trust.” Educational Administration Quarterly 45 (2): 168–216. doi:10.1177/0013161X08330499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diem, S., and M. D. Young. 2015. “Considering Critical Turns in Research on Educational Leadership and Policy.” International Journal of Educational Management 29 (7): 838–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diem, S., M. D. Young, A. D. Welton, K. C. Mansfield, and P.-L. Lee. 2014. “The Intellectual Landscape of Critical Policy Analysis.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 27 (9): 1068–1090. doi:10.1080/09518398.2014.916007.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. 2018. Just Research in Contentious Times: Widening the Methodological Imagination. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2003. “Beyond Empiricism: Policy Analysis as Deliberative Practice.” In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, edited by M. A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 209–227. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and H. Gottweis. 2012. The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–795. doi:10.1086/448181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, N. M., N. López, and V. N. Vélez. 2018. “QuantCrit: Rectifying Quantitative Methods through Critical Race Theory.” Race Ethnicity and Education 21 (2): 149–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, N. M., and O. J. Mayorga. 2018. “The Threat of Unexamined Secondary Data: A Critical Race Transformative Convergent Mixed Methods.” Race Ethnicity and Education 21 (2): 231–252. doi:10.1080/13613324.2017.1377415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D., P. Warmington, and S. Demack. 2018. “QuantCrit: Education, Policy, ‘Big Data’ and Principles for a Critical Race Theory of Statistics.” Race Ethnicity and Education 21 (2): 158–179. doi:10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottesman, I. 2016. The Critical Turn in Education: From Marxist Critique to Poststructuralist Feminism to Critical Theories of Race. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H. 2003. “Theoretical Strategies of Poststructuralist Policy Analysis: Towards an Analytics of Government.” In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, edited by M. A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 247–265. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gowlett, C. 2014. “Queer (Y) Ing and Recrafting Agency: Moving Away from a Model of Coercion versus Escape.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 35 (3): 405–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowlett, C. 2015. “Queer (Y) Ing New Schooling Accountabilities through My School: Using Butlerian Tools to Think Differently about Policy Performativity.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (2): 159–172. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.793926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. 2007. Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A. 2011. “Can Good Principals Keep Teachers in Disadvantaged Schools? Linking Principal Effectiveness to Teacher Satisfaction and Turnover in Hard-to-staff Environments.” Teachers College Record 113 (11): 2552–2585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., and H. Wagenaar. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D. C., W. Lachicotte Jr, D. Skinner, and C. Cain. 1998. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., and S. Griggs. 2012. “Poststructuralist Policy Analysis: Discourse, Hegemony, and Critical Explanation.” In The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy As Communicative Practice, edited by F. Fischer and H. Gottweis, 305–342. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husu, J. 2003. “Constructing Ethical Representations from the Teacher’s Pedagogical Practice: A Case of Prolonged Reflection.” Interchange 34 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1023/A:1024595600952.
   Google Scholar
• Husu, J., and K. Tirri. 2003. “A Case Study Approach to Study One Teacher’s Moral Reflection.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (3): 345–357. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00019-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., and H. May. 2012. “The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34 (4): 435–464. doi:10.3102/0162373712454326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M., M. A. Kraft, and J. P. Papay. 2012. “How Context Matters in High-Need Schools: The Effects of Teachers’ Working Conditions on Their Professional Satisfaction and Their Students’ Achievement.” Teachers College Record 114 (10): 1–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K., and P. Thomson. 2008. “Policy Rhetoric and the Renovation of English Schooling: The Case of Creative Partnerships.” Journal of Education Policy 23 (6): 715–727. doi:10.1080/02680930802262692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, M. 2019. “Educators as the “Frontline” of Human-Trafficking Prevention: An Analysis of State-Level Educational Policy.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 18 (3): 284–304. doi:10.1080/15700763.2017.1398337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, B. 2017. “Navigating the Relationship between Policy and Practice: Competing Discourses of Fear and Care in Teachers’ Sense-Making about the FAIR Education Act.” Journal of Education Policy 32 (5): 694–716. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1320730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. 2014. Politics, Policies and Pedagogies in Education: The Selected Works of Bob Lingard. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., S. Rawolle, and S. Taylor. 2005. “Globalizing Policy Sociology in Education: Working with Bourdieu.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (6): 759–777. doi:10.1080/02680930500238945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, N., C. Erwin, M. Binder, and M. J. Chavez. 2018. “Making the Invisible Visible: Advancing Quantitative Methods in Higher Education Using Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality.” Race Ethnicity and Education 21 (2): 180–207. doi:10.1080/13613324.2017.1375185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugg, C. A. 2006. “Thinking about Sodomy: Public Schools, Legal Panopticons, and Queers.” Educational Policy 20 (1): 35–58. doi:10.1177/0895904805285374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugg, C. A., and J. P. Murphy. 2014. “Thinking Whimsically: Queering the Study of Educational Policy-making and Politics.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 27 (9): 1183–1204. doi:10.1080/09518398.2014.916009.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, N. 2000. Subjectivity: Theories of the Self from Freud to Haraway. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. 1998. Ethnography through Thick and Thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martino, W., L. Airton, D. Kuhl, and W. Cumming-Potvin. 2019. “Mapping Transgender Policyscapes: A Policy Analysis of Transgender Inclusivity in the Education System in Ontario.” Journal of Education Policy 34 (3): 302–330. doi:10.1080/02680939.2018.1478992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinn, P. 2016. “From No Child Left behind to the Every Student Succeeds Act: Federalism and the Education Legacy of the Obama Administration.” Publius: the Journal of Federalism 46 (3): 392–415. doi:10.1093/publius/pjw014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinn, P. J. 2006. No Child Left behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy, 1965-2005. Lawrence, Kan: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 2007. “Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 48–76. doi:10.1177/2345678906292462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley, M. P., and T. A. Long. 2017. “Public Educational Policy as Performance: A Queer Analysis.” In Critical Approaches to Education Policy Analysis: Moving beyond Tradition, edited by M. D. Young and S. Diem, 243–260. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and N. L. Leech. 2005. “On Becoming a Pragmatic Researcher: The Importance of Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (5): 375–387. doi:10.1080/13645570500402447.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner, S. B. 2006. Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Huber, L., V. N. Vélez, and D. Solórzano. 2018. “More than ‘Papelitos:’ A QuantCrit Counterstory to Critique Latina/o Degree Value and Occupational Prestige.” Race Ethnicity and Education 21 (2): 208–230. doi:10.1080/13613324.2017.1377416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., S. J. Ball, A. Braun, and M. Maguire. 2017. “Translating Policy: Governmentality and the Reflective Teacher.” Journal of Education Policy 32 (6): 745–756. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1309072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. 2003. “‘Bodies are Dangerous’: Using Feminist Genealogy as Policy Studies Methodology.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 145–159. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. T. 2011. “Market-Driven Education Reform and the Racial Politics of Advocacy.” Peabody Journal of Education 86 (5): 580–599. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2011.616445.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P., S. Heimans, and K. Glasswell. 2014. “Policy Enactment, Context and Performativity: Ontological Politics and Researching Australian National Partnership Policies.” Journal of Education Policy 29 (6): 826–844. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.891763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P., S. Thomas, and J. Harris. 2013. “Recontextualising Policy Discourses: A Bernsteinian Perspective on Policy Interpretation, Translation, Enactment.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (4): 465–480. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.770554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (1995). “Arts of Existence: The Construction of Subjectivity in Older White Southern Women.” Doctoral diss., Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Talburt, S., and M. L. Rasmussen. 2010. “‘After‐queer’ Tendencies in Queer Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/09518390903447184.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., F. Rizvi, B. Lingard, and M. Henry. 1997. Educational Policy and The Politics Of Change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. 1993. Doing Critical Ethnography. Vol. 26. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., C. Hall, and K. Jones. 2010. “Maggie’s Day: A Small‐scale Analysis of English Education Policy.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (5): 639–656. doi:10.1080/02680931003783346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooms, A., and F. English. 2010. “Who Fits? A Dialog on the Politics of ‘Doing-being’ A Scholar.” Educational Policy 24 (1): 221–244. doi:10.1177/0895904809354877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. B. 2016. “Diffraction as a Method of Critical Policy Analysis.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 48 (13): 1381–1394. doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1211001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, K. 1991. “Freire and a Feminist Pedagogy Of Difference.„ Harvard Educational Review 61 (4): 449–475. doi:10.17763/haer.61.4.a102265jl68rju84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis, L., and M. Fine. 2004. Working Method: Research and Social Justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weis, L., and M. Fine. 2012. “Critical Bifocality and Circuits of Privilege: Expanding Critical Ethnographic Theory and Design.” Harvard Educational Review 82 (2): 173–201. doi:10.17763/haer.82.2.v1jx34n441532242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittig, M. 1992. The Straight Mind and Other Essays. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2003. “Accessing Local Knowledge.” In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, edited by M. A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 228–246. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. 2004. “Engineering School Markets, Constituting Schools and Subjectivating Students: The Bureaucratic, Institutional and Classroom Dimensions of Educational Triage.” Journal of Education Policy 19 (4): 407–431. doi:10.1080/0268093042000227474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. D. 1999. “Multifocal Educational Policy Research: Toward a Method for Enhancing Traditional Educational Policy Studies.” American Educational Research Journal 36 (4): 677–714. doi:10.3102/00028312036004677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. D., and S. Diem. 2014. “Putting Critical Theoretical Perspectives to Work in Educational Policy.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 27 (9): 1063–1067. doi:10.1080/09518398.2014.916015.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. D., and S. Diem. 2017. Critical Approaches to Education Policy Analysis: Moving beyond Tradition. Vol. 4. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar