Performance agreement through the lens of resource dependence theory

References

• Adam, Edmund. 2020. “Governments Base Performance-Based Funding on Global Rankings Indicators: A Global Trend in Higher Education Finance or a Global Rankings Literature Fiction? A Comparative Analysis of Four Performance-Based Funding Programs.” International Journal of Educational Development 76:102197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaboldi, Michela, I. Lapsley, and Ileana Steccolini. 2015. “Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge.” Financial Accountability & Management 31 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnholt, Bente, and H. H. Salomonsen. 2015. “Contracting and Performance in Agencies: A Question of Control, Dialogue or Autonomy?” Public Organization Review 15 (4): 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, Ivar, J. Enders, and B. Lepori. 2015. “Organizations as Penetrated Hierarchies: Environmental Pressures and Control in Professional Organizations.” Organization Studies 36 (7): 873–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615571960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broucker, B., Wit K De, C. Verhoeven, and Verhoven. 2017. “Higher Education Research: Looking Beyond New Public Management.” In Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, edited by J. Huisman and M. Tight, 21–38. 2017. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220170000003002.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, Nils, and K. Sahlin-Andersson. 2000. “Constructing Organizations: The Example of Public Sector Reform.” Organization Studies 21 (4): 721–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600214003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, Joseph C. 2002. Funding Public Colleges and Universities for Performance: Arguments About Performance Funding: Rhetoric and Reality. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, Stephen. 2006. “University Governance in Denmark: From Democracy to Accountability?” European Educational Research Journal 5 (3–4): 221–233. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2006.5.3.221.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, Joe. 2012. “Tension Between the Corporate and Collegial Cultures of Australian Public Universities: The Current Status,“critical Perspectives on Accounting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 23 (7–8): 556–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Gerald F., and J. Adam Cobb. 2010. “Resource Dependence Theory: Past and Future.” In Research in the Sociology of Organizations, edited by Frank Dobbin and Claudia Bird Schoonhoven, 21–42. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000028006.
   Google Scholar
• Degn, L., and Mads P. Sørensen. 2015. “From Collegial Governance to Conduct of Conduct: Danish Universities Set Free in the Service of the State.” Higher Education 69 (6): 931–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9814-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De, Boer H, B. Jongbloed, P. Benneworth, L. Cremonini, R. Kolster, A. Kottmann, K. Lemmens-Krug, and H. Vossensteyn. 2015. Performance-Based Funding and Performance Agreements in Fourteen Higher Education Systems. Twente, Netherlands: CHEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, Kevin J., M. Sosanya, Hana Jones, Rebecca Lahr, S. Natow, and Pheatt Lara. 2014. “Performance Funding for Higher Education: Forms, Origins, Impacts, and Futures.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 655 (1): 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214541042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, Richard M. 1962. “Power-Dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review 27 (1): 31–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, William A. 1989. “Educational Policy as an Ecology of Game.” Educational Researcher 18 (7): 18–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018007018.
   Google Scholar
• Fowles, Jacob. 2014. “Funding and Focus: Resource Dependence in Public Higher Education.” Research in Higher Education 55 (3): 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9311-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedegebuure, L. C. J., and L. Meek. 1994. “A resource dependence perspective on mergers: Comparing institutional amalgamations in Australia and the Netherlands.” In “Comparative Policy Studies in Higher Education”, edited by L. C. J. Goedegebuure and F. A van Vughy, 127–164. Vol. 19. Management and policy in higher education.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, Giuseppe, Kallio Kirsi-Mari, Sargiacomo Massimo, and Skoog. Matti. 2020. “Accounting, Performance Management Systems and Accountability Changes in Knowledge-Intensive Public Organizations: A Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability 33 (1): 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2019-3869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, Diana. 2017. “What Year? Difficulties in Identifying the Effect of Policy on University Output.” Journal of Informetrics 11 (3): 933–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, Amy J., Michael C. Withers, and Brian J. Collins. 2009. “Resource Dependence Theory: A Review.” Journal of management 35 (6): 1404–1427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmén, Janne. 2022. “The Autonomy of Higher Education in Finland and Sweden: Global Management Trends Meet National Political Culture and Governance Models.” Comparative Education 58 (2): 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2021.2018826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen Christian, B., and L. B. Andersen. 2014. “Performance Management in the Public Sector: Does It Decrease or Increase Innovation and Performance?” International Journal of Public Administration 37 (14): 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.928317.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, Kevin P., David Bell, Bobbi Deem, and Lydia McShane. 2014. “How Nonprofit Leaders Evaluate Funding Sources: An Exploratory Study of Nonprofit Leaders.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 (1): 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012458038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kholmuminov, S., Shayzak Kholmuminov, and Robert E. Wright. 2019. “Resource Dependence Theory Analysis of Higher Education Institutions in Uzbekistan.” Higher Education 77 (1): 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0261-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohtamäki, Vuokko. 2019. “Academic Leadership and University Reform-Guided Management Changes in Finland.” Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management 41 (1): 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2018.1553499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2018. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Fourth. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, Ingvild M., Mai-Lin Hofsøy, Zheng Ørvim Yuan, and P. Aasen. 2020. “Performance Agreements for Clearer Institutional Profiles and Better Division of Labour.” Tertiary Education & Management 26 (3): 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09034-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, Jonas K. 2020. “Resource Environment and Hierarchy in Universities.” Science & Public Policy 47 (2): 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Sardesai, Ann, James Guthrie, and P. Tucker Basil. 2020. “What You See Depends on Where You Look: Performance Measurement of Australian Accounting Academics.” Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 33 (6): 1193–1218. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2019-4133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Culture. 2022. Funding for Higher Education, Finland. https://minedu.fi/-/korkeakouluille-uusi-rahoitusmalli.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Higher Education and Science. 2022. Funding for Higher Education, Denmark. https://ufm.dk/en/education/higher-education/danish-universities/the-universities-in-denmark/funding-for-danish-universities/funding-for-higher-education-1/funding-for-higher-education.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, Poul E., and Niels Opstrup. 2020. Performance Management at Universities: The Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator at Work. 1st ed. Springer International Publishing https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21325-1.
   Google Scholar
• Nienhüser, Werner. 2008. “Resource Dependence Theory: How Well Does It Explain Behavior of Organizations?” Management Revue 19 (1/2): 9–32. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2008-1-2-9.
   Google Scholar
• Nisar, Muhammad A. 2015. “Higher Education Governance and Performance Based Funding as an Ecology of Games.” Higher Education 69 (2): 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9775-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, J. Douglas, and Karl E. Weick. 1990. “Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization.” The Academy of Management Review 15 (2): 203–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/258154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, Lee D. 2012. “From Privatised to Hybrid Corporatised Higher Education: A Global Financial Management Discourse.” Financial Accountability & Management 28 (3): 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00544.x.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Lee D. 2013. “Contemporary University Strategising: The Financial Imperative.” Financial Accountability & Management 29 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12000.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersen, Inger J. 2015. “From Metrics to Knowledge? Quality Assessment in Higher Education.” Financial Accountability & Management 31 (1): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald R. Salancik. 2003. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, Romulo, Lars Geschwind, Hanne Foss Hansen, Kirsi Pulkkinen. 2019 ed. Reforms, Organizational Change and Performance in Higher Education: A Comparative Account from the Nordic Countries. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11738-2.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, Theodore H., Maria P. Aristigueta, and Jeremy L. Hall. 2015. Managing and Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: An Integrated Approach. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Poutanen, Mikko. 2022. “‘I Am Done with That now.’ Sense of Alienations in Finnish Academia.” Journal of Education Policy 38 (4): 625–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2022.2067594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poutanen, Mikko, Tuukka Tomperi, Hanna Kuusela, Veera Kaleva, and Tuomas Tervasmäki. 2020. “From Democracy to Managerialism: Foundation Universities as the Embodiment of Finnish University Policies.” Journal of Education Policy 37 (3): 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1846080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabovsky, Thomas M. 2014. “Using Data to Manage for Performance at Public Universities.” Public Administration Review 74 (2): 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, Gary. 1992. “Organization Theory.” In Burton Rl Clark and Guy Neave 8ed.) the Encyclopedia of Higher Education, 1884–1896. Exter: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism : Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, Sheila, and Gary Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sol, Levine, and Paul E. White. 1961. “Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships.” Administrative science quarterly 5 (4): 583–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speklé, Roland, F., and Frank H.M. Verbeeten. 2014. “The Use of Performance Measurement Systems in the Public Sector: Effects on Performance.” Management Accounting Research 25 (2): 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, John, and Claire Baines. 2012. “Performance Management in UK Universities: Implementing the Balanced Scorecard.” Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management 34 (2): 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.662737.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Bogt, Henk J., and Robert W. Scapens. 2012. “Performance Management in Universities: Effects of the Transition to More Quantitative Measurement Systems.” European Accounting Review 21 (3): 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2012.668323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, James, D.1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Vakkuri, Jarmo, and Meklin. Pentti. 2006. “Ambiguity in Performance Measurement: A Theoretical Approach to Organisational Uses of Performance Measurement.” Financial Accountability & Management 22 (3): 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00401.x.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, Wouten, G. Bouckaert, and J. Halligan. 2015. Performance Management in the Public Sector. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315817590.
   Google Scholar
• van Helden, Jan, and C. Reichard. 2019. “Management Control and Public Sector Performance Management.” Baltic Journal of Management 14 (1): 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2018-0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedung, Evert. 1998. Policy instruments and typologies, edited by Carrots, Policy instruments and typologies, edited by, John McCormick, Ray Rist, and Evert Vedung, 23–54. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeeten, Frank H., and Roland F. Speklé. 2015. “Management Control, Results-Oriented Culture and Public Sector Performance: Empirical Evidence on New Public Management.” Organization Studies 36 (7): 953–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, Koen. 2005. “Effects of Autonomy, Performance Contracting, and Competition on the Performance of a Public Agency: A Case Study.” Policy Studies Journal 33 (2): 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00104.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, Koen, G. Roness Paul, Verschuere Bram, Rubecksen Kristin, and MacCarthaigh. Muiris. 2010. Autonomy and Control of State Agencies: Comparing States and Agencies. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillian. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230277274.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoest, Koen, B. Peters, Geert Guy, Bouckaert, and Bram. Verschuere. 2004. “The Study of Organisational Autonomy: A Conceptual Review.” Public Administration and Development 24:101–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, Richard. 2000. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Second ed. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, Richard. 2012. “Transforming Universities: National Conditions of Their Varied Organisational Actorhood.” Minerva (London) 50 (4): 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9215-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, Richard, and Jochen Gläser. 2014. “The Impact of Institutional Reforms on the Nature of Universities as Organisations.“ Transformation and Scientific Change: The Impact of Institutional Restructuring on Universities and Intellectual Innovation, edited by Whitley, Richard, Jochen Gläser and Michael Lounsbury, 19–49. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20140000042020.
   Google Scholar