208
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A Foucauldian analysis of research Assessment in a postcolonial context: the example of Hong Kong

ORCID Icon
Pages 660-678 | Received 07 Apr 2023, Accepted 03 Oct 2023, Published online: 12 Oct 2023

References

  • Adams, J., K. Gurney, T. Loach, and M. Szomszor. 2020. “Evolving Document Patterns in UK Research Assessment Cycles.” Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.00002.
  • Akdağ, E. G., and D. M. Swanson. 2018. “Ethics, Power, Internationalisation and the Postcolonial: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of Policy Documents in Two Scottish Universities.” European Journal of Higher Education 8 (1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1388188.
  • Ashcroft, B., G. Griffiths, and H. Tiffin, Eds. 1995. The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. London: Routledge.
  • Ashcroft, B., G. Griffiths, and H. Tiffin. 2000. Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
  • Bazzul, J., and L. Carter. 2017. “(Re)considering Foucault for Science Education Research: Considerations of Truth, Power and Governance.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 12 (2): 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9800-2.
  • Bence, V., and C. Oppenheim. 2005. “The Evolution of the Uk’s Research Assessment Exercise: Publications, Performance and Perceptions.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 37 (2): 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620500211189.
  • Broadbent, J. 2010. “The UK Research Assessment Exercise: Performance Measurement and Resource Allocation.” Australian Accounting Review 52 (20): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00076.x.
  • Currie, J. 2008a. “The Research Assessment Exercise in Hong Kong: Positive and Negative Consequences.” The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives 9 (1): 47–58.
  • Currie, J. 2008b. “Research Assessment Exercises and Some Negative Consequences of Journal Rankings and Citation Indices.” ACCESS: Contemporary Issues in Education 27 (1 & 2): 24–32.
  • Danielsonn, A., M. Berge, and M. Lidar. 2018. “Knowledge and Power in the Technology Classroom: A Framework for Studying Teachers and Students in Action.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 13 (1): 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9782-0.
  • Dei, G. J. S. 2002. Rethinking the Role of Indigenous Knowledges in the Academy. NA: Working Paper #58. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
  • Evers, C. W., and K. R. Katyal. 2008. “Assessing Research Quality in Education: The Hong Kong Research Assessment Exercise.” ACCESS: Contemporary Issues in Education 27 (1 & 2): 78–86.
  • Findlay, A., and L. Sparks. 2010. “The UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE 2008) and Retail Research Output.” The International Review of Retail, Distribution & Consumer Research 20 (5): 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2010.520511.
  • Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House LLC.
  • Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.
  • Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Pantheon.
  • Foucault, M. 1981. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Foucault, M. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181.
  • Foucault, M. 1983. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, 208–226. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Foucault, M. 2003a. “Technologies of the Self.” In The Essential Foucault, Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by P. Rabinow and N. Rose, 145–169. New York: New Press.
  • Foucault, M. 2003b. “What is Critique?” In The Essential Foucault, Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by P. Rabinow and N. Rose, 263–278. New York: New Press.
  • Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Bio-Politics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–1979, Edited by G. Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hall, D. L., and R. T. Ames. 1995. Anticipating China: Thinking Through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Hare, P. G. 2003. “The United Kingdom’s Research Assessment Exercise: Impact on Institutions, Departments, Individuals.” Higher Education Management and Policy 15 (2): 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v15-art12-en.
  • Hennion, A. 2017. “Attachments, You Say? … How a Concept Collectively Emerges in One Research Group.” Journal of Cultural Economy 10 (1): 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2016.1260629.
  • Kanu, Y. 2005. “Tensions and Dilemmas of Cross-Cultural Transfer of Knowledge: Post-Structural/postcolonial Reflections on an Innovative Teacher Education in Pakistan.” International Journal of Educational Development 25 (5): 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.01.002.
  • Kelly, A. 2022. “The End of the Line? A Quantitative Analysis of Two Decades of Competitive Assessment and Research Funding in UK Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (5): 701–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2120961.
  • Koelman, J., and R. Venniker. 2001. “Public Funding of Academic Research: The Research Assessment Exercise of the UK.” In Higher Education Reform: Getting the Incentives Right, edited by E. Canton, R. Venniker, B. W. A. Jongbloed, J. B. J. Koelman, P. H. van der Meer, and J. J. Vossensteyn, 101–117. Den Haag: SDU.
  • Li, D. 2021. University governance and academic work in a neoliberal landscape of higher education: Preparation for Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) 2020 in Hong Kong. Unpublished PhD dissertation. The University of Hong Kong.
  • Li, J. 2016a. “Chinese University 3.0 in a Global Age: History, Modernity and Future.” In Chinese Education Models in a Global Age: Transforming Practice into Theory, edited by P. C. I. Chou and J. Spangler, 15–35. Singapore: Springer.
  • Li, J. 2016b. “The Global Ranking Regime and the Reconfiguration of Higher Education: Comparative Case Studies on Research Assessment Exercises in China, Hong Kong, and Japan.” Higher Education Policy 29 (4): 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0015-7.
  • Li, D., and Y. Li. 2022a. “Preparing for RAE 2020 in Hong Kong: Academics’ Research, Writing and Publishing Trajectories in a Neoliberal Governance Landscape.” Studies in Higher Education 47 (7): 1410–1422. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1901272.
  • Li, D., and Y. Li. 2022b. “‘Trust the People, Not the institution’: University Preparation for the Research Assessment Exercise 2020 in Hong Kong.” Higher Education Research & Development 42 (3): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2096574.
  • Li, D., and Y. Li. 2023. “Masked Resistance in Neoliberal Academia: Academics’ Responses to the Research Assessment Exercise 2020 in Hong Kong.” Higher Education Policy 36 (2): 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00255-9.
  • Lin, M., and W. Zhao. 2023. Untangling the Making and Governing of Hong Kong Teachers Through Neoliberal, Confucian, and Affective Technologies: With and Beyond Foucault, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2023.2174074
  • Li, M., and R. Yang. 2020. “Enduring Hardships in Global Knowledge Asymmetries: A National Scenario of China’s English-Language Academic Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” Higher Education 80 (2): 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00476-3.
  • Lu, Y., and G. Jover. 2019. “An Anthropocosmic View: What Confucian Traditions Can Teach Us About the Past and Future of Chinese Higher Education.” Higher Education 77 (3): 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0280-z.
  • Macdonald, M., E. Gringart, D. Garvey, and K. Hayward. 2022. “Broadening Academia: An Epistemic Shift Towards Relationality.” Higher Education Research & Development 42 (3): 649–663. Online first. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2087602.
  • McNay, I. 2003. “Assessing the Assessment: An Analysis of the UK Research Assessment Exercise, 2001, and Its Outcomes, with Special Reference to Research in Education.” Science and Public Policy 30 (1): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780704.
  • Mcneel, I. F. 2023. “Research Excellence and the Origins of the Managerial University in Thatcher’s Britain.” Contemporary British History 37 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13619462.2022.2098720.
  • Oancea, A. 2019. “Research Governance and the Future(s) of Research Assessment.” Palgrave Communications 5 (27): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0213-6.
  • O’Sullivan, M. 2018. Hong Kong’s RAE is a Colonial Throwback. Time Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/hong-kongs-rae-colonial-throwback.
  • Parry, B. 1994. “Resistance Theory/Theorising Resistance, or Two Cheers for Nativism.” In Colonial Discourse/Postcolonial Theory, edited by F. Barker, P. Hulme, and Iverson. M, 172–196. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Parry, B. 1995. “Problems in Current Theories of Colonial Discourse.” In The Postcolonial Studies Reader, edited by B. Ashcroft, et al., 36–44. London: Routledge.
  • Roberts, H. 1998. Indigenous Knowledges and Western Science: Perspectives from the Pacific. In D. Hodson edited by, Science and technology education and ethnicity: An Aotearoa/New Zealand perspectives. The Royal Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Series #50, Thorndon, Wellington.
  • Said, E. W. 1978. Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Said, E. W. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto and Windus.
  • Salinas, F. J. 2021. “The Enactment of Policy Inside an Academic Profession: Following Impact into Philosophy.” Journal of Education Policy 38 (2): 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2021.1983653.
  • Schaefer, D. 2019. The Evolution of Affect Theory: The Humanities, the Sciences, and the Study of Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sikes, P. 2006. “Working in a ‘New’ University: In the Shadow of the Research Assessment Exercise?” Studies in Higher Education 31 (5): 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600922758.
  • Smith, R. 2008. “Introductory Editorial: The Politics of Research Assessment Exercises and Accountability – an International Overview.” ACCESS: Critical Perspectives on Communication, Cultural & Policy Studies 27 (1 & 2): 1–8.
  • Stronach, I. 2007. “On Promoting Rigour in Educational Research: The Example of the RAE.” Journal of Education Policy 22 (3): 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930701278518.
  • Tan, C. 2015. “Education Policy Borrowing and Cultural Scripts for Teaching in China.” Comparative Education 51 (2): 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2014.966485.
  • Tan, C. 2016. Educational Policy Borrowing in China: Looking West or Looking East?. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Tan, C. 2017. “The Enactment of the Policy Initiative for Critical Thinking in Singapore Schools.” Journal of Education Policy 32 (5): 588–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1305452.
  • Tan, C. 2019a. Comparing High-Performing Education Systems: Understanding Singapore, Shanghai, and Hong Kong. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Tan, C. 2019b. “Competence or Performance? A Bernsteinian Analysis of Basic Competency Assessment in Hong Kong.” British Journal of Educational Studies 67 (2): 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1423461.
  • Tan, C. 2019c. “Parental Responses to Education Reform in Singapore, Shanghai and Hong Kong.” Asia Pacific Education Review 20 (1): 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9571-4.
  • Tan, C., and C. S. K. Chua. 2015. “Education Policy Borrowing in China: Has the West Wind Overpowered the East Wind?” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 45 (5): 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.871397.
  • University Grants Committee 2017. Research Assessment Exercise. https://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/index.html.
  • University Grants Committee n.d. Framework for Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) 2020. https://www.ugc.edu.hk/doc/eng/ugc/rae/2020/framework.pdf.
  • Williams, P., and L. Chrisman. 1993. “Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: An Introduction.” In Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader, edited by L. Williams and L. Chrisman, 1–20. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Yang, R. 2013. “Responding to Living in a 2.2 World: ERA, Capacity Building and the Topography of Australian Educational Research from Hong Kong.” The Australian Educational Researcher 40 (4): 521–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0110-3.
  • Yang, R. 2019. “Turning Scars into Stars: A Reconceptualized View of Modern University Development in Beijing, Hong Kong, Taipei, and Singapore.” Frontiers of Education in China 14 (1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0001-0.
  • Yang, R., M. Xie, and W. Wen. 2019. “Pilgrimage to the West: Modern Transformations of Chinese Intellectual Formation in Social Sciences.” Higher Education 77 (5): 815–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0303-9.
  • Yokoyama, K. 2006. “The Effect of the Research Assessment Exercise on Organisational Culture in English Universities: Collegiality versus Managerialism.” Tertiary Education & Management 12 (4): 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2006.9967176.
  • Zembylas, M. 2022a. “Affective Ideology and Education Policy: Implications for Critical Policy Research and Practice.” Journal of Education Policy 37 (4): 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1861339.
  • Zembylas, M. 2022b. “Theorizing ‘Affective infrastructure’ in Education Policy: Articulating New Political Imaginaries for a More Equitable Future.” Journal of Education Policy 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2022.2157048.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.