757
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Relationships and Connectedness: Weak Ties that Help Social Inclusion Through Public Access Computing

&
Pages 271-295 | Published online: 23 Jan 2013

References

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
  • Amariles, F., Paz, O. P., Russell, N., & Johnson, N. (2006). The impacts of community telecentres in rural Colombia. The Journal of Community Informatics 2(3). Retrieved from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/issue/view/15
  • Angel, D. (Ed.). (1998). Señales de Humo: Panorama de la Televisión Local y Comunitaria en Colombia. Bogota: CINEP, Fundación Social.
  • APC, Escobar Sarria, J. M., Paz Martínez, O. P., & Ospina Saavedra, P. A. (2009). Colombia: estrategia de Apertura de los Establecimientos Educativos como Centros de Acceso Comunitario a Internet. 1–51. Retrieved from http://www.apc.org/es/system/files/CILACInvestigacionColombia_20090707.pdf
  • Bailey, A. (2009). Issues affecting the social sustainability of telecentres in developing contexts: A field study of sixteen telecentres in Jamaica. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 36(4), 1–18.
  • Bailey, A., & Ngwenyama, O. (2010). Bridging the generation gap in ICT use: Interrogating identity, technology and interactions in community telecenters. Information Technology for Development, 16(1), 62–82. doi: 10.1080/02681100903566156
  • Baron, L. F., & Gomez, R. (2012a). Social network analysis of public access computing: Relationships as a critical benefit of libraries, telecenters and cybercafés in developing countries. Paper presented at iConference 2012. Toronto.
  • Baron, L. F., & Gomez, R. (2012b). Perceptions of connectedness: Public access computing and social inclusion in Colombia. Paper presented at HICSS 2012. Maui, Hawaii.
  • Baron, L. F., & Valdes, M. (2012). Public access ICT in Colombia. In R. Gomez (Ed.), Libraries, telecenters, cybercafes and public access to ICT: International comparisons (pp. 169–183). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Becker, S., Crandall, M. D., Fisher, K. E., Kinney, B., Landry, C., & Rocha, A. (2010). Opportunity for all: How the American public benefits from internet access at U.S. Libraries. Washington, DC: Institute of Museum and Library Services.
  • Benjamin, P. (2001). Telecentres in South Africa. Journal of Development Communication: Special Issue on Telecenters, 12(2), 1–6.
  • Bertot, J. C., McClure, C. R., Thomas, S., Barton, K. M., & McGilvray, J. (2007). Public libraries and the internet 2007: Report to the American library association. Tallahassee, FL: College of Information, Florida State University.
  • Biblioteca Nacional de Colombia. (2011). Qué es la Red Nacional de Bibliotecas Públicas? Retrieved February 12, 2011, from http://www.bibliotecanacional.gov.co/?idcategoria=27552
  • Campbell, C., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2000). Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 255–270. doi: 10.1002/1099-1298(200007/08)10:4<255::AID-CASP582>3.0.CO;2-M
  • Casasbuenas, J. (2007). Gestión de Conocimiento e Intercambio de Experiencias entre Telecentros Comunitarios y Telecentros Compartel en Colombia. Paper presented at the Encuentro Latinoamericano de Telecentros e Inclusión Social 2007, Santiago de Chile.
  • Chamberlin, J. (1997). A working definition of empowerment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 20(4), 43–46.
  • Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little, Brown.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human-capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. doi: 10.1086/228943
  • Colnodo; Asociación para el Progreso de las Comunicaciones – APC; Corporación Colombia Digital; Observatorio de Sociedad, G. y. T. d. I.-O. (Octubre de 2007). Resultados consulta sobre Políticas de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (TIC) en Colombia.
  • Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2002). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Doctor, R. D. (1991). Information technologies and social equity – confronting the revolution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(3), 216–228. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199104)42:3<216::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-Y
  • Díaz Andrade, A., & Urquhart, C. (2009). The value of extended networks: Social capital in an ICT intervention in rural Peru. Information Technology for Development, 15(2), 108–132. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20116
  • Etta, F., & Parvyn-Wamahiu, S. (2003). Information and communication technologies for development in Africa: volume 2. The experience with community telecentres. Ottawa/Dakar: International Development Research Centre (IDRC)/Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa.
  • Finquelievich, S., & Prince, A. (2007). El (involuntario) rol social de los cibercafés (Cibercafes’ (involuntary) social role). Buenos Aires: Editorial Dunken.
  • Garrido, M., Rothschild, C., & Oumar, T. (2009). Technology for Employability in Washington State: The Role of ICT Training on the Employment, Compensation and Aspirations of Low-Skilled, Older and Unemployed Workers. Retrieved from http://cis.washington.edu/employability/2009/10/29/technology-for-employability-in-washington-state/
  • Gibson, A., Bertot, J., & McClure, C. (2009). Emerging role of public librarians as E-government providers. Baltic IT&T Review, 10, 1–10.
  • Gomez, R. (2010). Structure and flexibility in global research design: Methodological choices in landscape study of public access in 25 countries. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 11(3), 231–258. doi: 10.1108/14678041011098523
  • Gomez, R. (Ed.). (2012). Libraries, telecentres, cybercafes and public access to ICT: International comparisons. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Gomez, R. (2012b). Users’ perceptions of impact of public access computing in Colombia: libraries, telecenters and cybercafés. Information Technologies & International Development ITID, 3(8), 19–33.
  • Gomez, R., Hunt, P., & Lamoureux, E. (1999). Telecentre evaluation and research: A global perspective. In R. Gomez & P. Hunt (Eds.), Telecentre evaluation: A global perspective (pp. 13–29). Ottawa: IDRC.
  • Gomez, R., & Reilly, K. (2002). Comparing approaches: Telecentre evaluation experiences in Asia and Latin America. The International Information & Library Review, 34(1), 57–78. doi: 10.1006/iilr.2002.0184
  • Gould, E., & Gomez, R. (2010). New challenges for libraries in the information age: A comparative study of ICT in public libraries in 25 countries. Information Development, 6(11), 166–176. doi: 10.1177/0266666910367739
  • Gurol, M., & Sevindik, T. (2007). Profile of internet cafe users in Turkey. Telematics and Informatics, 24(1), 59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2005.12.004
  • Gurstein, M. (2008). What is community informatics (and why does it matter)?. MilanItaly: Polimetrica.
  • Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (1999). Netville online and offline: Observing and surveying a wired suburb. The American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 475–492. doi: 10.1177/00027649921955290
  • Haseloff, A. M. (2005). Cybercafes and their potential as community development tools in India. The Journal of Community Informatics 1(3). Retrieved from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/226/181
  • Heeks, R. (2009). The ICT4D 2.0 Manifesto: Where next for ICTs and International Development? Working paper. Institute for Development Policy and Management. Manchester, UK. Retrieved from http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/di/documents/di_wp42.pdf
  • Hudson, R. (2010). Colombia: A country study Area handbook series [550–26] (pp. 1 online resource (450 p.)). Retrieved from http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo13656
  • Jensen, M., & Esterhuysen, A. (2001). The telecentre cookbook for Africa: Recipes for self-sustainability. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00125
  • Kavanaugh, A. L., & Patterson, S. J. (2001). The impact of community computer networks on social capital and community involvement. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 496–509. doi: 10.1177/00027640121957312
  • Kleine, D. (2009, April). ICT4What? Using the choice framework to operationalise the capability approach to development. Paper presented at the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Information Technology and Development (ICTD) 2009, Doha, Qatar.
  • Kumar, R., & Best, M. (2006). Social Impact and diffusion of telecenter use: A study from the sustainable access in rural India project. Journal of Community Informatics 2(3). Retrieved from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/issue/view/15
  • Kuriyan, R., & Kitner, K. R. (2009). Constructing class boundaries: Gender, aspirations and shared computing. Information Technologies & International Development, 5(1), 17–29.
  • Mager, A. (2009). Mediated health: Sociotechnical practices of providing and using online health information. New Media and Society, 11(7), 1123–1142. doi: 10.1177/1461444809341700
  • Mayanja, M. (2006). Rethinking telecentre sustainability approaches. The Journal of Community Informatics 2(3). Retrieved from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/viewArticle/324
  • Mehra, B., Merkel, C., & Bishop, A. P. (2004). The internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New Media Society, 6(6), 781–802. doi: 10.1177/146144804047513
  • Melkote, S. R., & Steeves, H. L. (2001). Communication for development in the third world. Theory and practice for empowerment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miller, D. B., & Rudnick, L. (2010). The case for situated theory in modern peacebuilding practice. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 5(2), 62–74. doi: 10.1080/15423166.2010.628686559959
  • Ministerio de Cultura (2010). Ley de Bibliotecas Públicas. Una guía de fácil comprensión. BogotáColombia: Republica de Colombia.
  • Ministerio de Cultura, & Biblioteca Nacional de Colombia (2009). Plan Nacional de Lectura y Bibliotecas. Colombia: Ministerio de Cultura.
  • Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(1), 23–42. doi: 10.1177/0021886300361002
  • Pal, J., Lakshmanan, M., & Toyama, K. (2009). My child will be respected”: Parental perspectives on computers and education in rural India. Information Systems Frontiers, 11(2), 129–144. doi: 10.1007/s10796-009-9172-1
  • Parkinson, S., & Ramirez, R. (2006). Using a sustainable livelihoods approach to assessing the impact of ICTs in development. Journal of Community Informatics 2(3). Retrieved from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/310
  • Paz, O. (2007). Alternativas y desafíos de las TIC en el medio rural: Apuntes con base en el contexto colombiano. Retrieved from www.colnodo.apc.org
  • Philipsen, G. (2011). Local Strategies Research. Retrieved from http://localstrategiesresearch.washington.edu/
  • Pigg, K. E., & Crank, L. D. (2004). Building community social capital: The potential and promise of information and communications technologies. The Journal of Community Informatics, 1(1), 58–73.
  • Prado, P., Araujo Camara, M., & de Figuredo, M. A. (2010). Evaluating ICT adoption in rural Brazil: A quantitative analysis of telecenters as agents of social change. Journal of Community Informatics 7(1&2). Retrieved from http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/663/714
  • Proenza, F. (2001). Telecenter sustainability – Myths and opportunities. Journal of Development Communication, 12(2), 15
  • Proenza, F., Bastidas-Buch, R., & Montero, G. (2002). Telecenters for Socioeconomic and Rural Development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank. 17. Retrieved from http://www.iadb.org/sds/itdev/telecenters/exsum.pdf
  • Putnam, D. R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Putnam, D. R. (1995). Bowling alone. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. doi: 10.1353/jod.1995.0002
  • Quan-Haase, A., & Wellman, B. (2004). How does the internet affect social capital. Social Capital and Information Technology, 113, 135–113.
  • Qureshi, S. (2010). Extending human capabilities through information technology applications and infrastructures. Information Technology for Development, 16(1), 1 doi: 10.1080/02681101003704374
  • Roman, R. (2003). Diffusion of innovations as a theoretical framework for telecenters. Information Technologies and International Development, 1(2), 53–66. doi: 10.1162/154475203322981969
  • Rutkauskiene, U. (2008). Impact measures for public access computing in public libraries. Vilnius, Lithuania: Vilnius University.
  • Salvador, T., Sherry, J. W., & Urrutia, A. E. (2005). Less cyber, more café: Enhancing existing small businesses across the digital divide with ICTs. Information Technology for Development, 11(1), 77–95. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20004
  • Sey, A., & Fellows, M. (2009). Literature review on the impact of public access to information and communication technologies Working Paper No. 6. Seattle: Center for Information & Society, University of Washington.
  • Simpson, L. E. (2005). Community informatics and sustainability: Why social capital matters. The Journal of Community Informatics 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/210
  • Universidad de los Andes (2009). Public access to information & ICTs final report: Colombia. Seattle: University of Washington Center for Information & Society (CIS).
  • Unwin, T. (2009). ICT4D: Information and communication technology for development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Walkinshaw, B. P. (2007). Why do Riecken libraries matter for rural development? A synthesis of findings from monitoring and evaluation. Washington, DC: Riecken Foundation.
  • Walther, J., Carr, C., Choi, S., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J., Tong, S., & Heide, B. (2011). Interaction of interpersonal, peer, and media. In Z. Papacharissi & S. Networked (Eds.), A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 17–38). New York: Routledge.
  • Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Williams, K., & Durrance, J. (2008). Social networks and social capital: Rethinking theory in community informatics. Journal of Community Informatics, 4(3). Retrieved from http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/465
  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory & Society, 27(2), 151–208. doi: 10.1023/A:1006884930135
  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599. doi: 10.1007/BF02506983

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.