Enabling Social Sustainability of E-Participation through Mobile Technology

References

• Abrahams, L., & Newton-Reid, L. (2008). E-governance for social and local economic development: Gauteng city region perspective, Johannesburg: LINK Center, University of Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• African Union. (2010). ICT for development. In 14th African union summit on “information and communication technologies in Africa: Challenges and prospects for development”. Addis Ababa: Author. Retrieved from http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/conferences/2010/january/summit/14thsummit.html
   Google Scholar
• Ali, M., & Bailur, S. (2007). The challenge of “sustainability” in ICT4D – is Bricolage the answer. In 9th International conference on social implications of computers in developing countries. Sao Paulo, Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.ifipwg94.org.br/fullpapers/R0010-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Almuwil, A., Weerakkody, V., & El-Haddadeh, R. (2011). A conceptual study of factors influencing e-inclusion. In European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern conference on information systems (pp. 30–31). May 30–31 2011, Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, A., & Joia, L. A. (2011). Organizational structure and ICT strategies in Brazilian judiciary system. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), S32–S42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avgerou, C. (2010). Discourses on ICT and development. Information Technologies and International Development, 6(3), 1–18. doi: 10.4018/jiit.2010070101
   Google Scholar
• Avgerous, C. (2008). Information systems in developing countries: A critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 133–146. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. (2009). Issues affecting the social sustainability of telecentres in developing contexts: A field study of sixteen telecentres in Jamaica. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 36(4), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bailur, S. (2007). Using stakeholder theory to analyze telecenter projects. Information Technologies and International Development, 3(3), 61–80. doi: 10.1162/itid.2007.3.3.61
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S. (2004). E-government and developing countries: An overview. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 18, 109–132. doi: 10.1080/13600860410001674779
   Google Scholar
• Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2009). The impact of the digital divide on E-government use. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 132–135. doi: 10.1145/1498765.1498801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public value in complex and changing times. In J. Benington and M. H. Moore (Eds.), Public value: Theory and Practice (pp.1–30). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan, S. H. (2011). Modernizing Bangladesh public administration through e-governance: Benefits and challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 54–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2013). Global information technology report 2013: Growth and jobs in a hyperconnected world. Geneva: World Economic Forum and INSEAD. Retrieved July 28, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, T. C., Chen, J. R., & Pu, C. K. (2008). Exploring the collective actions of public servants in E-government development. Decision Support Systems, 45, 251–265. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. (1998). Crisis and foundations: An inquiry into the nature and limits of models and methods in the information systems discipline. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 7, 5–16. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8687(98)00020-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. (2008). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communications (2012). Strategic plan 2012–2017, Pretoria: Government Printers, Republic of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Donat, E., Brandtweiner, R., & Kerschbaum, J. (2009). Attitudes and the digital divide: Attitude measurement as instrument to predict internet usage. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 12(1), 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, R., Thorpe, M., & Conole, G. (2012). Student attitudes towards and use of ICT in course study, work and social activity: A technology acceptance model approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 71–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, A. (2007). Is governance reform a catalyst for development?. Governance, 20(2), 165–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00352.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, R., Abokhodair, N., Bayo, I., & Park, M. (2013). Computer training to empower day laborers: A heat map to address emotional barriers and technical skills. In 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R., & Gould, E. (2010). The “cool factor” of public access to ICT users’ perceptions of trust in libraries, telecenters and cybercafe's in developing countries. Information Technology & People, 23(3), 247–264. doi: 10.1108/09593841011069158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 533–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. (2011). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 29(1), 199–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2011.00526.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, N. (2008). Transforming government and empowering communities: Sri Lankan experience with E-development, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, N., & Westrup, C. (2012). Context and the processes of ICT for development. Information and Organization, 22(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2002). E-government in Africa: Promise and practice. Information Polity, 7(2), 97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2008). ICT 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer, 41, 26–33. doi: 10.1109/MC.2008.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2010). Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development? Journal of International Development, 22(5), 625–640.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, M. V., Nurminen, J. K., Smura, T., & Hammainen, H. (2012). Energy efficiency of mobile handsets: Measuring user attitudes and behavior. Telematics and Informatics, 29(4), 387–399. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M. (2010). When is cheap, cheap enough to bridge the digital divide? Modeling income related structural challenges of technology diffusion in Latin America. World Development, 38(5), 756–770. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. (2002). Reinventing local government and the E-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62, 434–444. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüsing, T., & Selhofer, H. (2002, January). The digital divide index – a measure of social inequalities in the adoption of ICT. ECIS, , 1273–1286.
   Google Scholar
• ITU. (2013). ICT facts and figures. Retrieved July 28, 2013, from The World in 2013: http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsfigures2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IWS. (2013). Internet usage statistics for Africa. Retrieved from Internet World Stats: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2003). E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 389–394. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, G. F., Moon, J., Rhee, C., & Rho, J. J. (2010). E-government skills identification and development: Toward a stage-based user – centric approach for developing countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klecun, E. (2008). Bringing lost sheep into the fold: Questioning the discourse of the digital divide. Information Technology & People, 21(3), 267–282. doi: 10.1108/09593840810896028
   Google Scholar
• Lai, J. Y., & Chang, C. Y. (2011). User attitudes toward dedicated e-book readers for reading: The effects of convenience, compatibility and media richness. Online Information Review, 35(4), 558–580. doi: 10.1108/14684521111161936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76(Summer), 313–333. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of risk and control. In R. Baskerville, J. Stage, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Organizational and social perspectives on information technology, (pp. 167–178). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219.
   Google Scholar
• Misuraca, G. (2009). E-government 2015: Exploring M-government scenarios, between ICT – driven experiments and citizen-centric implications. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(3), 407–424. doi: 10.1080/09537320902750871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukabeta, M., Owei, V., & Alexander, H. (2008). Questioning the pace and pathway of e-government development in Africa: A case study of South Africa's Cape Gateway project. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 757–777. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutula, S. M., & Van Brakel, P. (2007). ICT skills readiness for the emerging global digital economy among small businesses in developing countries: Case study of Botswana. Library Hi Tech, 25(2), 231–245. doi: 10.1108/07378830710754992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, J. (2006). Researching information systems and computing, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ochara, N. (2012). Grassroots community participation as a key to e-governance sustainability in Africa. African Journal of Information and Communication, 12, 26–47.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C., & McKague, K. (2009). Sustainable local enterprise networks: Network Bricolage as institutional entrepreneurship in low-income economies. Institutional theory conference, 20 (p. 2011). Edmonton: University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Reffat, R. (2003). Developing successful E-government. Working paper. School of Architecture, Design Science and Planning, University of Sydney, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, R. (2003). Diffusion of innovations as a theoretical framework for telecenters. Information Technologies and International Development, 1(2), 55–68. doi: 10.1162/154475203322981969
   Google Scholar
• Silva, L., & Westrup, C. (2009). Development and the promise of technological change. Information Technology and Development, 15, 59–65. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipior, J. C., & Ward, B. T. (2012). Bridging the digital divide for e-government inclusion: A United States case study. Case Studies in E-Government, 1, 167
   Google Scholar
• STATSSA (2012). Census 2011 – key results, Pretoria: Author.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2012). United Nations E-government survey 2012: E-government for the people, uthor.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2010). Measuring internet skills. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26(10), 891–916. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2010.496338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315–326. doi: 10.1080/01972240309487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdegem, P., & Verhoest, P. (2009). Profiling the non-user: Rethinking policy initiatives stimulating ICT acceptance. Telecommunications Policy, 33, 642–652. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2009.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social exclusion: Rethinking the digital divide, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, P., Kamal, M., & Qureshi, S. (2008). Meeting the challenges of ICT adoption by micro-enterprises. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(6), 616–632. doi: 10.1108/17410390810911212
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, N. V., Wangenheim, F. V., & Bitner, M. J. (2013). igh tech and high touch a framework for understanding user attitudes and behaviors related to smart interactive services. Journal of Service Research, 16(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1177/1094670512448413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, D. J., Gulati, G. J., & Tawileh, A. (2010). Explaining the global digital divide: The impact of public policy initiatives on digital opportunity and ICT development. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldız, M., & Saylam, A. (2013). E-government discourses: An inductive analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 141–153. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., & Sun, H. (2009). The complexity of different types of attitudes in initial and continued ICT use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2048–2063. doi: 10.1002/asi.21116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar