Practices of Legibility Making in Indian Cities: Property Mapping Through Geographic Information Systems and Slum Listing in Government Schemes

References

• Abbott, J. (2003). The use of GIS in informal settlement upgrading: its role and impact on the community and on local government. Habitat International, 27, 575–593. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00035-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baud, I. S. A., & Nainan, N. (2008). “Negotiated spaces” for representation in Mumbai: ward committees, advanced locality management and the politics of middle-class activism. Environment and Urbanization, 20, 483–499. doi:10.1177/0956247808096124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baud, I. S. A., Peffer, K., Sridharan, N., & Nainan, N. (2009). Matching deprivation mapping to urban governance in three Indian mega-cities. Habitat International, 33, 365–377. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint2008.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S. (2008a). Inclusive or Contested – Conceptualizing a Globalised Bangalore. In D. Mahadevia (Ed.), Inside the transforming urban Asia – processes, policies and public actions (pp. 170–193). New Delhi: Concept.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S. (2008b). Occupancy Urbanism: Radicalizing Politics and Economy beyond Policy and Programs. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32, 719–729. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00809.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S., Raman, B., & Rajan, M. (2008). “Fractured” terrain, spaces left over, or contested. In D. Mahadevia (Ed.), Inside the transforming urban Asia – Processes, policies and public actions (pp. 139–285). New Delhi: Concept.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out – classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, K. A. (2011). Legibility & control: Themes in the work of James C. Scott (Center for a Stateless Society Paper No. 12, Spring/Winter).
   Google Scholar
• Crang, M. (2005). Qualitative methods: there is nothing outside the text? Progress in Human Geography, 29, 225–233. doi:10.1191/0309132505ph541pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dijk, T. v. (2011). Networks of urbanization in two Indian cities. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 2, 303–319. doi:10.1177/097542531100200211
   Google Scholar
• Fenster, M. (2006). The opacity of transparency. Iowa Law Review, 91, 885–949. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., & Gupta, A. (2002). spatializing states: toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist, 29, 981–1002. doi:10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghertner, D. A. (2010). Calculating without numbers: aesthetic governmentality in Delhi's slums. Economy and Society, 39, 185–217. doi:10.1080/03085141003620147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. (2006). Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state: A reader (pp. 211–242). Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Lewis, R. (2012). Numbers didn't count: the streets of colonial Bombay and Calcutta. Urban History, 39, 639–658. doi:10.1017/S0963926812000429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, F. (2006). Elasticity between the cadastre and land tenure: Balancing civil and political society interests in Poland. Information Technology for Development, 12, 291–310. doi:10.1002/itdj.20049
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2007). Multi-sited ethnography as a middle range methodology for contemporary STS. Science, Technology & Human Values, 32, 651–671. doi:10.1177/0162243907303598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homburg, V. (2008). Understanding e-government – information systems in public administration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, M. S. (2012). Government of paper: The materiality of bureaucracy in urban Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, P., Sen, S., & Hobson, J. (2002). Experiences with surveying and mapping Pune and Sangli slums on a geographical information system (GIS). Environment and Urbanization, 14, 225–240. doi:10.1177/095624780201400218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli, D., Sliuzas, R., Kerle, N., & Stein, A. (2012). An ontology of slums for image-based classification. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36, 154–163. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. (2005). Beyond “the state” and failed schemes. American Anthropologist, 107, 383–394. Retrieved from http://www.ucpress.edu/journals/rights.htm. doi: 10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madon, S. (2009). E-governance for development – a focus on rural India. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Madon, S., & Sahay, S. (2000). Urbanisation and megacities in developing countries: The management challenge. In C. Avgerou & G. Walsham (Eds.), Information technology in context: Studies from the perspective of developing countries (pp. 220–233). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Madon, S., Sahay, S., & Sahay, J. (2004). Implementing property tax reforms in Bangalore: An actor-network perspective. Information and Organization, 14, 269–295. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2004.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Prins, J. E. J., Broeders, D., & Griffioen, H. M. (2012). iGovernment: A new perspective on the future of government digitisation. Computer Law & Security Review, 28, 273–282. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2012.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman, B. (2012). The rhetoric and reality of transparency – transparent information, opaque city spaces and the empowerment question. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(2). Retrieved from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/866/909
   Google Scholar
• Ranganathan, M. (2012). Reengineering citizenship – Municipal reforms and the politics of “e-Grievance redressal” in Karnataka's Cities. In R. Desai & R. Sanyal (Eds.), Urbanizing citizenship – contested spaces in Indian cities (pp. 109–132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, C. (2011). In-tensions to infrastructure: Developing digital property databases in urban Karnataka, India. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 2(2), 205–222.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, C., Miscione, G., De', R., & Pfeffer, K. (2011). Enlisting SDI for urban planning in India: Local practices in the case of slum declaration. In Z. Nedović-Budić, J. Crompvoets & Y. Georgiadou (Eds.), Spatial Data Infrastructures in Context - North and South (pp. 157–179). Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2003). City requiem Calcutta: Gender and the politics of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8, 76–87. doi:10.1177/1473095208099299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state – how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, L. (2007). Institutionalization does not occur by decree: Institutional obstacles in implementing a land administration system in a developing country. Information Technology for Development, 13, 27–48. doi:10.1002/itdj.20056
   Google Scholar
• Stalder, F. (2011). The fight over transparency: From a hierarchical to a horizontal organization. Open, 22, 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology – an overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (1997). The tyranny of light: The temptations and paradoxes of the information society. Futures, 29, 827–843. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00035-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar