Examining the Implementation of a European Patent Management System in Brazil from an Actor-Network Theory Perspective

References

• Agarwal, S. P., Gupta, A., & Dayal, R. (2007). Technology transfer perspectives in globalising India. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(4), 397–423. doi: 10.1007/s10961-006-9025-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akubue, A. I. (2002). Technology transfer: A third world perspective. The Journal of Technology Studies, 28(1), 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Baark, E., & Heeks, R. (1999). Donor-funded information technology transfer projects: Evaluating the life-cycle approach in four Chinese science and technology projects. Information Technology for Development, 8, 185–197. doi: 10.1080/02681102.1999.9525309
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (2007). The myths of egovernment: Looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government. The Information Society, 23(5), 373–382. doi: 10.1080/01972240701572913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessen, J., & Meurer, M. J. (2007). What's wrong with the patent system? Fuzzy boundaries and the patent tax. First Monday, 12(6), 1–17. doi: 10.5210/fm.v12i6.1867
   Google Scholar
• Beynon-Davies, P., & Williams, M. D. (2003). Evaluating electronic local government in the UK. Journal of Information Technology, 18(2), 137–149. doi: 10.1080/0268396032000101180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W., & Law, J. (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brito, C. H., & Chaimovich, H. (2010). Relatório UNESCO sobre ciência 2010: O atual status da ciência em torno do mundo.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A Relatório UNESCO, Brasília. sociology of knowledge (pp. 132–161). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H. J. (2009). Technology transfer issues and a new technology transfer model. Journal of Technology Studies, 35(1), 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. (2003). Unveiling e-government and development: Governing at a distance in the new war (Department of Information Systems, Working Paper Series). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., Gharawi, M. A., & Burke, B. (2012). Transnational public sector knowledge networks: Knowledge and information sharing in a multi-dimensional context. Government Information Quarterly, 29, S112–S120. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., & Prefontaine, L. (2003). Understanding new models of collaborating for delivering government services. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 40–42. doi: 10.1145/602421.602444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eglene, O., & Dawes, S. S. (2006). Challenges and strategies for conducting international public management research. Administration & Society, 38(5), 596–622. doi: 10.1177/0095399706291816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbanna, A. (2011). Applying actor network theory and managing controversy. In Y. K. Dwived, M. Wade, & S. L. Schineberger (Eds.), Information systems theory: Explaining and predicting our digital society (pp. 117–127). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galini, N. T. (1992). Patent policy and costly imitation. RAND Journal of Economics, 23(1), 52–63. doi: 10.2307/2555432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharawi, M., & Dawes, S. (2010). Conceptualizing knowledge and information sharing in transnational knowledge networks. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government. Retrieved June 15, 2013, from www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/working/conceptualizing_TPSKNs
   Google Scholar
• Godinho, M. M., & Ferreira, V. (2012). Analyzing the evidence of an IPR take-off in China and India. Research Policy, 41, 499–511. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (1993). Appealing work: An investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. Organization Science, 4(4), 595–616. doi: 10.1287/orsc.4.4.595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473–496. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, E., & Giuberti, A. C. (2010). Economic impacts of pre-salt on a regional economy: The case of Espírito Santo, Brazil. In 2010 – Sustainable regional growth and development in the creative knowledge economy. 50th Anniversary European Congress of the Regional Science Association International, 2010, Jönköping, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, K., & Seo-Zindy, R. (2013). ICTs and social movements under authoritarian regimes: An actor-network perspective (Actor-Network Theory for Development, Working Paper No. 51). University of Manchester, Centre for Development Informatics, Institute for Development Policy and Management. Retrieved August 20, 2013, from http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/di/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. Journal of Information Technology for Development, 18(2), 101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2004). E-government as a carrier of context (Paper No. 15). Institute for Development Policy and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing e-government: An international text. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, H., & Kasimin, H. (2010). Structuring a successful information technology transfer process: A case study from the perspectives of actor network theory. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 9, 17–39.
   Google Scholar
• INPI. (2010). Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial: relatório de gestão do exercício de 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, H., & Moore, E. (1991). Technology transfer and communication: Lesson from silicon valley, Route 128, Carolina's Research Triangle and Hi-tech Texas. Journal of Information Science, 17, 273–280.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2003). Egovernment around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 389–394. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagoda, K. I. (2007). A stage-gate model for planning and implementing international technology transfer (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Western Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kifle, M., Mbarika, V., & Tan, J. (2007). Telemedicine transfer in sub-Saharan Africa: Investigating infrastructure and culture. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H., & Myers, M. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–94. doi: 10.2307/249410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, S., & Walsham, G. (2005). Implementing public information systems in developing countries: Learning from a success story. Information Technology for Development, 11(2), 123–140. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20007
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor network, ordering, strategy and heterogenity. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 21–52). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macome, E. (2008). On implementation of an information system in the Mozambican context: The EDM case viewed through ANT lenses. Information Technology for Development, 14(2), 154–170. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20063
   Google Scholar
• Margetts, H. (2006). Egovernment in Britain: A decade on. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 250–265. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsl003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, politics and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430–445. doi: 10.1145/358141.358148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard, J. (2008). E-government measurement for policy makers. European Journal of ePractice, 4, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, E. (2000). Actor-network theory and information infrastructure. In control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructure. In C. Ciborra (Ed.), From control to drift. The dynamics of corporate information infrastructure (pp. 71–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nhampossa, J. L. (2005). Re-thinking technology transfer as technology translation: A case study of health information systems in Mozambique (PhD thesis). Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, R. (2011). Dealing with plenty: Brazil in the era of surplus oil (Master thesis). University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (1991). Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1(1), 9–42. doi: 10.1016/0959-8022(91)90011-3
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1287/isre.2.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Analytica. (2010). The impact of pre-salt: A long term perspective (A Report Prepared for PETROBRAS).
   Google Scholar
• Pursell, C. (1993). The rise and fall of the appropriate technology movement in the United States, 1965–1985. Technology and Culture, 34(3), 629–637. doi: 10.2307/3106707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S. (2011). Globalization in development: Do information and communication technologies really matter? Information Technology for Development, 17(4), 249–252. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2011.610142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J. (2009). Using actor-network theory to trace an ICT (telecenter) implementation trajectory in an African women's micro-enterprise development organization. Information Technologies and International Development, 5(3), 1–20. doi: 10.4018/jiit.2009070101
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. (1972). Nordhaus’ theory of optimal patent life: A geometric reinterpretation. American Economic Review, 62(3), 422–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekaran, L. C., & Belasubramanin, S. (2010). Initiative for strengthening technology commercialization and the intellectual property rights systems in Southeast Asia and India. International Journal of Intellectual Property, 1, 25–47.
   Google Scholar
• Stanforth, C. (2006). Using actor-network theory to analyze e-government implementation in developing countries. Information Technologies and International Development, 3, 35–60. doi: 10.1162/itid.2007.3.3.35
   Google Scholar
• Teles, A., & Joia, L. A. (2011). Assessment of digital inclusion via the actor-network theory: The case of the Brazilian municipality of Piraí. Telematics and Informatics, 28, 191–2011. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Pottelsberghe, B., & Mejer, M. (2010). The London agreement and the cost of patenting in Europe. European Journal of Law and Economics, 29(2), 211–237. doi: 10.1007/s10657-009-9118-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wynsberghe, R., & Khan, S. (2007). Redefining case study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), 80–94.
   Google Scholar
• Verdegem, P., & Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered egovernment in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 487–497. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivas-Eugui, D., & Bellmann, C. (2004, September 15–17). Towards development oriented technical assistance in intellectual property policymaking. Reflections on IPR Technical Assistance to Developing Countries & Transition Economies workshop, Burnham Beeches.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting information systems in organizations. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G., & Sahay, S. (1999). GIS for district-level administration in India: Problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 39–66. doi: 10.2307/249409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G., & Sahay, S. (2006). Research on information systems in developing countries: Current landscape and future prospects. Information Technology for Development, 12(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20020
   Google Scholar
• WIPO. (2011). World intellectual property report 2011 – the changing face of innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Dawes, S. S. (2006). Expectations and perceptions of the benefits and barriers of knowledge sharing and the successes in public sector knowledge networks. Public Performance and Management Review, 29(4), 433–465.
   Google Scholar