Theory Building for ICT4D: Systemizing Case Study Research Using Theory Triangulation

References

• Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In E. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). New York: The Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Arno Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avgerou, C. (2010). Discourses on ICT and development. Information Technologies and International Development, 633(3), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. E., & Grant, G. G. (2010). Highlighting the duality of the ICT and development research agenda. Information Technology for Development, 16(2), 96–111. doi: 10.1080/02681101003687793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2000). Choosing telecommunications? Consumers in a liberalised privatised telecommunications sector. Media International Australia, 96, 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Closs, D. J., Jacobs, M. A., Swinka, M., & Scott, W. G. (2008). Toward a theory of competencies for the management of product complexity: Six case studies. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), 590–610. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (2005). The economics of social capital. Economic Record, 81, S2–S21. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2005.00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1978). Strategies of multiple triangulation. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), The research act: A theoretical introduction in sociological methods (pp. 297–314). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7–20. doi: 10.1080/713701144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselhart, K. (2004). The electronic canary: Sustainability solutions for Australian teleservice centres. Wangaratta, VIC: Community Teleservices. A report commissioned by the Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York, NY: Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gurstein, M. (2007). What is community informatics and why does it matter? Milan: Polemetrica.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A., & Midgley, J. (2004). Social policy for development. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hevesi, C. (2005). Twelfth ministerial meeting of the online council. Online Council Secretariat Retrieved from http://www.minister.dcita.gov.au/coonan/media/media_releases/twelfth_ministerial_meeting_of_the_online_council
   Google Scholar
• Janesick, V. J. (1998). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodology, and meaning. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 35–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, R. (1995). Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, R. (2000). Social informatics: A new perspective on social research about information and communication technology. Prometheus, 18(3), 245–264. doi: 10.1080/713692067
   Google Scholar
• Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17. doi: 10.3102/0013189X017002013
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, D. M., & Meredith, J. R. (1993). Conducting case study research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11, 239–256. doi: 10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, M. (1996). Business research through argument. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, J. (2003). Social development: The intellectual heritage. Journal of International Development, 15(7), 831–844. doi: 10.1002/jid.1038
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, J. (2006). Developmental social policy: Theory and practice. Asian Journal of Social Policy, 2(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 241–242. doi: 10.2307/249422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17, 2–26. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
   Google Scholar
• NSW Department of Commerce. (2004). Joint Commonwealth and New South Wales Community Technology Program: Final project report (No. 2000/202). Sydney: NSW Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Pusey, M. (1991). Economic rationalism in Canberra. Sydney: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S. (2011). Editorial: Information technology for development in expanding capabilities. Information Technology for Development, 17(2), 91–94. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2011.569355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regional Telecommunications Inquiry. (2002). Connecting regional Australia: The report of the regional telecommunications inquiry. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative enquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, L., Daws, L., & Pini, B. (2004). Public internet access revisited. Telecommunications Policy, 28, 323–337. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tibben, W. J. (2009). Revisiting the question of social capital in public policy: exploring new directions for community informatics research. In L. Stillman, G. Johanson & T. Denison (Eds.), Conference of the Community Informatics Research Network (pp. 1–10). Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Community Networking Research, Caulfield School of IT, Monash University. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/3295/.
   Google Scholar
• Tibben, W. (2013). Towards a theory of community technology centers: A knowledge-based study. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3583–3592). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. Retrieved from http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.564
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 320–330. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2013). Development informatics in a changing world: Reflections from ICTD2012/2012. Information Technologies and International Development, 9(1), 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G., & Sahay, S. (2006). Research on information systems in developing countries: Current landscape and future prospects. Information Technology for Development, 12(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20020
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Weaver, L. H., & Ellis, A. (2006). The CTC@NSW program: Achievements and ongoing challenges. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 2(2), 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar