Can the internet promote democracy? A cross-country study based on dynamic panel data models

References

• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. R., & Yared, P. (2005). From education to democracy? American Economic Review, 95(2), 44–49. doi: 10.1257/000282805774669916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amichai-Hamburger, Y., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Tal, S. A. (2008). E-empowerment: Empowerment by the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1776–1789. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. doi: 10.2307/2297968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrom, J. (2001). Should democracy online be quick, strong, or thin? Communications of the ACM, 44, 49–51. doi: 10.1145/357489.357505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailard, C. S. (2014). Democracy’s double-edged sword: How internet use changes citizens’ views of their government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baybeck, B., & Huckfeldt, R. (2002). Urban contexts, spatially dispersed networks, and the diffusion of political information. Political Geography, 21(2), 195–220. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00056-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, M. L., & Wade, K. W. (2009). The internet and democracy: Global catalyst or democratic dud? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 255–271. doi: 10.1177/0270467609336304
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, C. A. (1998). The paradox of technology: What’s gained and lost? Thought & Action, 14(1), 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, P. (2008). Educators and education for democracy: Moving beyond “thin” democracy. Inter-American Journal of Education and Democracy, 1(2), 147–165.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing e-democracy back in: Why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 443–455. doi: 10.1177/0894439303256372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. L. & Rubin, M. A. (1987). The role of information in a democracy and in government operations: The public choice methodology. Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 3(Part B), 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. (2014). Internet and democratic citizenship among the global mass publics: Does internet use increase political support for democracy? Japanese Journal of Political Science, 15(04), 661–682. doi: 10.1017/S1468109914000292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T., & Cutbirth, C. W. (1998). Mediated political communication, the internet, and the new knowledge elites: Prospects and portents. Telematics and Informatics, 15(3), 203–217. doi: 10.1016/S0736-5853(98)00013-6
   Google Scholar
• Desanctis, G., Fayard, A., Roach, M., & Jiang, L. (2003). Learning in online forums. European Management Journal, 21(5), 565–577. doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00106-3
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2008). The spirit of democracy (1st. ed.). New York, NY: Times Books.
   Google Scholar
• Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2015). The economist intelligence unit’s democracy index: Democracy in retreat. Retrieved January 25, 2017, from http://graphics.eiu.com/PDF/Democracy_Index_2015_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (2009). Civil society (2nd. ed.). Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2017). Online community and democracy. Journal of Cyberspace Policy Studies, 1(1), 37–60.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, E. S. (2009). Is internet censorship compatible with democracy?: Legal restrictions of online speech in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 2, 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (2009). Virtual public consultation: Prospects for Internet deliberative democracy. In T. Davies & S. P. Gangadharan (Eds.), Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice (pp. 23–35). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, A. L. (2009). Civil society, moderate Islam, and politics in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Civil Society, 5(2), 107–127. doi: 10.1080/17448680903154907
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. (2016). Freedom in the world. Washington, DC: Freedom House.
   Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T., Lavenex, S., Schimmelfennig, F., Skripka, T., & Wetzel, A. (2011). Democracy promotion through functional cooperation? The case of the European neighbourhood policy. Democratization, 18(4), 1026–1054. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2011.584738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, E. J., Hochstetler, K., & Clark, A. M. (2005). Sovereignty, democracy, and global civil society: State-society relations at UN world conferences. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gimmler, A. (2001). Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 27(4), 21–39. doi: 10.1177/019145370102700402
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Ponzetto, G., & Shleifer, A. (2007). Why does democracy need education? Journal of Economic Growth, 12(2), 77–99. doi: 10.1007/s10887-007-9015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshek, J. (2009). The democratic effects of the internet, 1994–2003: A cross-national inquiry of 152 countries. International Communication Gazette, 71(3), 115–136. doi: 10.1177/1748048508100909
   Google Scholar
• Guillén, M. F., & Suárez, S. L. (2005). Explaining the global digital divide: Economic, political and sociological drivers of cross-national internet use. Social Forces, 84(2), 681–708. doi: 10.1353/sof.2006.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2005). Cultural and economic prerequisites of democracy: Reassessing recent evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(4), 87–106. doi: 10.1007/BF02686166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., & Rosen, H. S. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, 56(6), 1371–1395. doi: 10.2307/1913103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoguchi, T., Newman, E., & Kean, J. (1998). Changing nature of democracy. New York: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2016). World telecommunication/ICT indicators database. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• James, O. (2011). Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 399–418. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2004). A Web for all reasons: Uses and gratifications of internet components for political information. Telematics and Informatics, 21(3), 197–223. doi: 10.1016/S0736-5853(03)00037-6
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., & Jang, J. W. (2010). Profiling good Samaritans in online knowledge forums: Effects of affiliative tendency, self-esteem, and public individuation on knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1336–1344. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H. (2016). Digital democracy in Asia: The impact of the Asian internet on political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 90, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. doi: 10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonkila, M. (2008). The internet and anti-military activism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(7), 1125–1149. doi: 10.1080/09668130802230671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Cordova, J. E., & Meisner, C. M. (2008). The impact of international trade on democracy: A long-run perspective. World Politics, 60(4), 539–75. doi: 10.1353/wp.0.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, K. M. (2006). The perils and promise of global transparency. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Magnani, L., & Bardone, E. (2006). The internet as a moral mediator. The quest for democracy. In G. Crnkovic (Ed.), Proceedings of the International European Conference Computing and Philosophy (pp. 1–9). Vienna: UTI Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Mahrer, H., & Krimmer, R. (2005). Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: Identifying the notion of the ‘middleman paradox’. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 27–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00184.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjikian, M. (2012). Threat talk: Comparative politics of internet addiction. Basingstoke: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, M., & Moreno-Riaño, G. (2013). The prospect of internet democracy. Basingstoke: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Jimenez, J. M., & Polasek, W. (2003).e-democracy and knowledge. A multicriteria framework for the new democratic era. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(2-3), 163–176. doi: 10.1002/mcda.354
   Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muskhelishvili, M., & Jorjoliani, G. (2009). Georgia’s ongoing struggle for a better future continued: Democracy promotion through civil society development. Democratization, 16(4), 682–708. doi: 10.1080/13510340903083000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. (1999). Leadership. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle? Political communications in post-industrial societies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283. doi: 10.1177/1461444804041444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirannejad, A. (2011). The effect of ICT on political development: A qualitative study of Iran. Information Development, 27(3), 186–195. doi: 10.1177/0266666911414386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat, R. K. (2005). The internet and political participation exploring the explanatory links. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 435–459. doi: 10.1177/0267323105058251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, G. (2007). Revolution in the post-Fordist revolution? Notes on the internet as a weapon of the multitude. Third Text, 21(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1080/09528820601138055
   Google Scholar
• Rethemeyer, R. K. (2006). Policymaking in the age of internet: Is the internet tending to make policy networks more or less inclusive? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 259–284. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mul001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Rhue, L., & Sundararajan, A. (2014). Digital access, political networks and the diffusion of democracy. Social Networks, 36, 40–53. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, A. (1998). Towards a systematic study of internet-based political and social communication in Europe. Telematics and Informatics, 15(3), 135–161. doi: 10.1016/S0736-5853(98)00010-0
   Google Scholar
• Rindermann, H. (2008). Relevance of education and intelligence for the political development of nations: Democracy, rule of law and political liberty. Intelligence, 36(4), 306–322. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of e-participation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Nisbet, M. C. (2002). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(3), 55–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2014). Democracy promotion and civil society in Eastern Europe: Conclusions. In Civil society and democracy promotion (pp. 217–233). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerfeldt, E. J. (2013). The civility of social capital: Public relations in the public sphere, civil society, and democracy. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 280–289. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E., Nisbet, E. C., & Epstein, D. (2016). Differential effects of capital-enhancing and recreational internet use on citizens’ demand for democracy. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650216644645.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. L. (2001). Does the internet create democracy? Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies, 22(2), 126–147. doi: 10.1080/02560054.2001.9665885
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 175–185. doi: 10.1177/106591290305600206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyama, K. (2010). Human–computer interaction and global development. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 4(1), 1–79. doi: 10.1561/1100000021
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. H. (2016). How ‘networked authoritarianism’ was operationalized in China: Methods and procedures of public opinion control. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(101), 731–744. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2016.1160506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weare, C. (2002). The internet and democracy: The casual links between technology and politics. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(5), 659–691. doi: 10.1081/PAD-120003294
   Google Scholar
• White, C. S. (1997). Citizen participation and the internet: Prospects for civic deliberation in the information Age. The Social Studies, 88(1), 23–28. doi: 10.1080/00377999709603741
   Google Scholar
• Wickrama, K. A. S., & Mulford, C. L. (1996). Political democracy, economic development, disarticulation, and social well-being in developing countries. The Sociological Quarterly, 37(3), 375–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1996.tb00744.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo-Young, C. (2005). Online civic participation and political empowerment: Online media and public opinion formation in Korea. Media, Culture & Society, 27(6), 925–935. doi: 10.1177/0163443705057680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2016). World development indicators. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wynia, B. L. (1974). Federal bureaucrats’ attitudes toward a democratic ideology. Public Administration Review, 34, 156–162. doi: 10.2307/974939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar