Analyzing conflict and its management within ICT4D partnerships: an institutional logics perspective

References

• Adam, L., James, T., & Wanjira, A. M. (2007). Frequently asked questions about multi-stakeholder partnerships in ICTs for development. Johannesburg: APC.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing – insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2014.893615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, R., Gregory, R. W., & Marschollek, O. (2015). The interplay of institutional logics in IT public-private partnerships. ACM SIGMIS Database, 46(1), 24–38. doi: 10.1145/2747544.2747547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381. doi: 10.5465/amr.2011.0431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Carmel, E., Lacity, M. C., & Doty, A. (2014). The impact of impact sourcing: Framing a research agenda. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, & J. Dibbern (Eds.), Information systems outsourcing (pp. 397–429). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chandwani, R., & De, R. (2015). The institutional dynamics perspective of ICT for health initiatives in India. In A. Chib, J. May, & R. Barrantes (Eds.), Impact of information society research in the Global South (pp. 167–185). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• CPP. (2009). Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument. Sunnyvale, CA: CPP.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fife, E., & Hosman, L. (2007). Public private partnerships and the prospects for sustainable ICT projects in the developing world. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 2(3), 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geldof, M., Grimshaw, D. J., Kleine, D., & Unwin, T. (2011). What are the key lessons of ICT4D partnerships for poverty reduction. London: DFID.
   Google Scholar
• GPSDD. (2016). The data ecosystem and the global partnership. Washington, DC: Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data.
   Google Scholar
• Greener, P. (2004). Multi-stakeholder partnerships. In G. Weigel & D. Waldburger (Eds.), ICT4D – Connecting people for a better world (pp. 196–205). Berne: SDC.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.590299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, N., & Rajao, R. (2011). Competing institutional logics and sustainable development: The case of geographic information systems in Brazil's Amazon region. Information Technology for Development, 17(1), 4–23. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2010.511701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2009). The godfather of ICT4D, and ICT4D’s first computer. ICT4DBlog, 1 Jan.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2014). ICT4D 2016, Development Informatics Working Paper 59. Manchester: Centre for Development Informatics, University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Hosman, L. (2011). Making the transition from pilot to scale: Examining sustainability and scalability issues in a public-private telecenter partnership in Sri Lanka. Information Technology for Development, 17(3), 232–248. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2011.568225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosman, L., & Fife, E. (2008). Improving the prospects for sustainable ICT projects in the developing world. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 4(1), 51–69. doi: 10.1386/macp.4.1.51_1
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, D. (2016). Should rich nations help the poor? Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamali, D. (2004). A public-private partnership in the Lebanese telecommunications industry. Public Works Management & Policy, 9(2), 103–119. doi: 10.1177/1087724X04268365
   Google Scholar
• Kabanoff, B. (1987). Predictive validity of the MODE conflict instrument. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 160–163. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaliannan, M., Awang, H., & Raman, M. (2010). Public-private partnerships for e-government services: Lessons from Malaysia. International Journal of Institutions and Economies, 2(2), 207–220.
   Google Scholar
• Karnani, A. (2011). “Doing well by doing good”: The grand illusion. California Management Review, 53(2), 69–86. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2011.53.2.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, M., Dongier, P., & Qiang, C. Z.-W. (2009). Overview. In Information and communications for development (pp. 3–17). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., & Teisman, G. R. (2000). Governing public-private partnerships. In S. Osborne (Ed.), Public-private partnerships (pp. 84–101). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kotlarsky, J., Scarbrough, H., & Oshri, I. (2014). Coordinating expertise across knowledge boundaries in offshore-outsourcing projects. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 607–627. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuriyan, R., & Ray, I. (2009). Outsourcing the state? Public-private partnerships and information technologies in India. World Development, 37(10), 1663–1673. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuriyan, R., Ray, I., & Toyama, K. (2008). Information and communication technologies for development: The bottom of the pyramid model in practice. The Information Society, 24(2), 93–104. doi: 10.1080/01972240701883948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, J. (1997). The politics of business associations in the developing world. The Journal of Developing Areas, 32(1), 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J. C., & Utting, P. (Eds.) (2010). Business, politics and public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marschollek, O., & Beck, R. (2012). Alignment of divergent organizational cultures in IT public-private partnerships. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 4(3), 153–162. doi: 10.1007/s12599-012-0213-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, D., Ambrose, E., McIvor, R., & Lamming, R. (2015). Self-interest or the greater good. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(4), 547–576. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2013-0124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, L. (2005). Cisco Systems, the United Nations, and the corporatisation of development. In G. Lovink & S. Zehle (Eds.), Incommunicado reader (pp. 50–63). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. (1990). New methods for qualitative data collection and analysis: Vignettes and pre-structured cases. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(1), 37–51. doi: 10.1080/0951839900030104
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mirza, I. (2013). The provision of information services in a new political economy: A case study from Hyderabad, India. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(1), 148–172. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2012.731774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi, Y., & Ben-Attar, D. (2011). “Downtown” and “suburbia” public-private partnerships (PPP) in the application of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D). In H. S. Desivilya & M. Palgi (Eds.), The paradox in partnership: The role of conflict in partnership building (pp. 36–48). Sharjah: Bentham Science.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, A. K., Cutrell, E., & Parthasarathy, B. (2013). Instituting credibility, accountability and transparency in local service delivery? In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on information and communication technologies and development (pp. 238–247). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1251–1262. doi: 10.2307/3069399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A., & Duran, X. (2002). Factors shaping successful pro-poor ICT public-private partnerships. London: Commonwealth Policy Studies Unit, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, B., Malik, F., Morgan, S., & Heeks, R. (2015). Exploring hybrids of commercial and welfare logics in impact sourcing. In P. Nielsen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference on social implications of computers in developing countries (pp. 78–91). Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• ODF. (Ed.) (2007). Multistakeholder partnerships and digital technologies for development in Latin America and the Caribbean. San Jose: Omar Dengo Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. J. (2013). Opening the black box of ICT4D: Advancing our understanding of ICT4D partnerships (PhD thesis). Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. J., & Lejano, R. P. (2013). ICT4D partnership: A review and reframing. In N. Hayes & R. L. L. Rovere (Eds.), Into the future: Themes, insights and agendas for ICT4D research and practice (pp. 39–54). Mona: University of the West Indies.
   Google Scholar
• Qiang, C. Z.-W., Yamamichi, M., Hausman, V., Miller, R., & Altman, D. (2012). Mobile applications for the health sector. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Renken, J., & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising ICT4D project champions. In J. Donner & T. Parikh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on information and communication technologies and development (pp. 128–131). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rukanova, B., Wigand, R. T., van Stijn, E., & Tan, Y.-H. (2015). Understanding transnational information systems with supranational governance: A multi-level conflict management perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 182–197. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahay, S., Sæbø, J. I., Mekonnen, S. M., & Gizaw, A. A. (2010). Interplay of institutional logics and implications for deinstitutionalization: Case study of HMIS implementation in Tajikistan. Information Technologies & International Development, 6(3), 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sanner, T. A., & Sæbø, J. I. (2014). Paying per diems for ICT4D project participation: A sustainability challenge. Information Technologies & International Development, 10(2), 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for business students. Essex: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Saz-Carranza, A., & Longo, F. (2012). Managing competing institutional logics in public-private joint ventures. Public Management Review, 14(3), 331–357. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2011.637407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Silvius, A. J., Sheombar, A., & Smit, J. (2009). The partnership health of ICT projects in developing countries. PACIS 2009 Proceedings, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Stratton, C., Sholler, D., Bailey, D., Leonardi, P., & Rodriguez-Lluesma, C. (2016). Competing institutional logics in ICT4D education projects: A South American study. Paper presented at ICTD ‘16, Ann Arbor, MI, 3–6 June.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. S., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2014). Knowledge transfer and utilization in IT outsourcing partnerships: a preliminary model of antecedents and outcomes. Information & Management, 51(2), 177–186. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265–274. doi: 10.1002/job.4030130307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., & Kilmann, R. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. R. (2011). Institutional logics and public management. Paper presented at 11th Public Management Research Association Conference, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 2–4 June.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tribe, L. (2011). Forgetting the ‘C’ in ICT4D: A critical examination of the Global Alliance for ICT and Development (MA thesis). Ottawa, ON: Carleton University.
   Google Scholar
• UNGA. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, Resolution A/Res/70/1. New York, NY: UN General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• UNGA. (2016). Towards global partnerships: A principle-based approach to enhanced cooperation between the United Nations and all relevant partners, Resolution A/RES/70/224. New York, NY: UN General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, T. (2009). ICT4D implementation: Policies and partnerships. In T. Unwin (ed.), ICT4D: Information and communication technology for development (pp. 125-175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, T. (2015). Multistakeholder partnerships. In R. Mansell & P. H. Ang (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of digital communication and society (Vol. 1, pp. 634–644). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81. doi: 10.1057/ejis.1995.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womack, D. F. (1988). Assessing the Thomas-Kilmann conflict MODE survey. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(3), 321–349. doi: 10.1177/0893318988001003004
   Google Scholar