Digital platforms for research collaboration: using design science in developing a South African open knowledge repository

References

• Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., & Venable, J. (2007). Soft design science research: Extending the boundaries of evaluation in design science research. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Blake, E., & Tucker, W. (2006). Socially aware software engineering for the developing world. In Information Society Technologies – Africa (IST-Africa) 2006 conference proceedings (pp. 1–8). Retrieved from http://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:3856190
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, J., & Toyama, K. (2009). What constitutes good ICTD research? Information Technologies and International Development, 5(3), 82–94. doi: 10.1038/nm1110-1198
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, E., & Sahay, S. (2007). Participatory design for social development: A South African case study on community-based health information systems. Information Technology for Development, 13(1), 71–94. doi:10.1002/itdj doi: 10.1002/itdj.20052
   Google Scholar
• Chouikha, M. B., & Dakhli, S. (2012). The dimensions of knowledge sharing. In MCIS 2012 Proceedings (Paper, 16). Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2012/16
   Google Scholar
• Conger, S. (2014). Knowledge management for information and communications technologies for development programs in South Africa. Information Technology for Development, 1102, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2014.899960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H. (1994). Saving IT’s soul: Human centered information management. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 119–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, R. M., & Martinsons, M. G. (2016). Debates and perspectives: Context is king! Considering particularism in research design and reporting. Journal of Information Technology, 31, 241–249. doi: 10.1057/jit.2015.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Moor, A. (2015). Towards a participatory community mapping method: The Tilburg urban farming community case. Adjunct Proceedings of the Communities et Technologies Conference, 12, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Dinter, B., Kollwitz, C., Möslein, K., & Roth, A. (2016). Combining open innovation and knowledge management in communities of practice – an analytics driven approach. In Proceedings of the 22nd Americas conference on information systems (pp. 1–10).
   Google Scholar
• Drechsler, A., & Hevner, A. (2016). A four-cycle model of IS design science research: Capturing the dynamic nature of IS artifact design. In Emerging Insights from Ongoing Design Science. St. John: DESRIST. Retrieved from https://cora.ucc.ie/handle/10468/2560
   Google Scholar
• Fath-allah, A., Cheikhi, L., Al-qutaish, R. E., & Idri, A. (2014, May). E-government maturity models: A comparative study. International Journal of Software Engineering and Applications (IJSEA), 5(3), 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Geldof, M., Grimshaw, D. J., Kleine, D., & Unwin, T. (2011). What are the key lessons of ICT4D partnerships for poverty reduction? Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08aba40f0b6497400072c/DFID_ICT_SR_Final_Report_r5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gill, T. G., & Hevner, A. (2013). A fitness-utility model for design science research. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 4(2), 1–24. doi: 10.1145/2499962.2499963
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, M. E. (2002). Types of knowledge and their roles in technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(3), 219–231. doi: 10.1023/A:1015672119590
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. (2002). Design theory in information systems. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 10(1), 14–22. doi: 10.3127/ajis.v10i1.439
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 30(3), 611–642. doi: 10.2307/25148742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, G., & Foth, M. (2005). Action research in the design of new media and ICT systems. In Topical issues in communications and media research (pp. 79–94). New York, NY: Nova Science. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/1910/
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer, 41(6), 26–33. doi: 10.1109/MC.2008.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2014). Future priorities for development informatics research from the post-2015 development agenda. Development informatics. Retrieved from papers2://publication/uuid/E62B26A8-CEBC-4A60-A869-94B02AB6E969
   Google Scholar
• Herselman, M., & Botha, A. (2014). Designing and implementing an information communication technology for rural education development (ICT4RED) initiative in a resource constrained environment: Nciba school district, Eastern Cape. Pretoria: CSIR Meraka.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 87–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 28(1), 75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, R. E., & Weber, R. P. (2007). New tools for resolving wicked problems: Mess mapping and resolution mapping processes. Retrieved from http://www.strategykinetics.com/New_Tools_For_Resolving_Wicked_Problems.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jabagi, N., Jiang, J., MacLean, D., Chalmeau, S., & Yang, J. (2016). Communicating to practitioners through IS research : A descriptive review. In Twenty-second Americas conference on information systems (pp. 1–10), San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Karokola, G., & Yngström, L. (2009). Discussing E-government maturity models for developing world-security view. In H. S. Venter, M. Coetzee, & L. Labuschagne (Eds.), Information security for South Africa (pp. 81–98). Johannesburg: ISSA.
   Google Scholar
• Kolfschoten, G. L., & de Vreede, G. J. (2009). A design approach for collaboration processes: A multimethod design science study in collaboration engineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 225–256. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, D. (2000). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2–3), 101–105. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71408-8 doi: 10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00039-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. (2016). The interplay between knowledge sharing and IT artifacts in the working contexts. In Twenty-second Americas conference on information systems (pp. 1–10). San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Loudon, M., & Rivett, U. (2011). Enacting openness in ICT4D research. Information Technologies and International Development, 7(1), 33–44. doi: 10.4018/jiit.2011010103
   Google Scholar
• Mosweunyane, G., & Carr, L. A. (2014). Direct desktop-repository deposits with SWORD. In Paul Cunningham & Miriam Cunningham (Eds.), 2014 IST-Africa conference proceedings (pp. 1–8). IIMC International Information, Management Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R., Grillitsch, W., & Muller-Stingl, A. (2007). Best practices und Lessons Learned aus Wissensmanagement-Initiativen. Community of knowledge. Beitrage Zu Einsteinger Wissenmanagement. Retrieved from http://www.community-of-knowledge.de/beitrag/best-practices-und-lessons-learned-aus-wissensmanagement-initiativen
   Google Scholar
• Pandaa, A., & Guptab, R. (2014). Making academic research more relevant: A few suggestions. IIMB Management Review, 26(3), 156–169. doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2014.07.008
   Google Scholar
• Paulin, D., & Suneson, K. (2012). Knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers – three blurry terms in KM. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Platz, M., & Van Biljon, J. (2015). Design of an open ICT4D knowledge repository. In Paul Cunningham & Miriam Cunningham (Eds.), IST-Africa 2015 conference proceedings (pp. 1–11). IIMC International Information, Management Corporation. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2015.7190542
   Google Scholar
• Platz, M., & Van Biljon, J. (2016). Development of a first version of a maturity matrix for ICT4D knowledge repositories. In Paul Cunningham & Miriam Cunningham (Eds.), IST-Africa 2016 conference proceedings (pp. 1–10). IIMC International Information, Management Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Pries-heje, B. J., & Baskerville, R. (2008). Special issue. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 731–755. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(15)00926-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S. (2015). Are we making a better world with information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) research? Findings from the field and theory building. Information Technology for Development, 21(4), 511–522. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2015.1080428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roztocki, N., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2011). Information technology success factors and models in developing and emerging economies. Information Technology for Development, 17(3), 163–167. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2011.568220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., & Flyverbom, M. (2016). Representing participation in ICT4D projects. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7), 692–703. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L., & Elder, L. (2010). Open ICT ecosystems transforming the developing world. Information Technology & International Development, 6(1), 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Snowden, D. (2002). Just in time knowledge management. Knowledge Management Review, 1, 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Soeftestad, L. (2001). Aligning needs and means. On culture, ICT and knowledge in development cooperation. In 24th Information System Research (pp. 11–14). Retrieved from http://ict.developmentgateway.org/uploads/media/ict/soeftestad_l_002_iris2001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tibben, W. J. (2015). Theory building for ICT4D: Systemizing case study research using theory triangulation. Information Technology for Development, 21(4), 628–652. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2014.910635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Biljon, J., Pottas, A., Lehong, S., & Platz, M. (2016). 21. Content category selection towards a maturity matrix for ICT4D knowledge sharing platforms. In Lisa Seymour & Antonio Díaz Andrade (Eds.), Conference on information resources management (Conf-IRM) – digital emancipation in a networked society, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2012). Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2), 87–93. doi: 10.1057/jit.2012.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2013). Development informatics in a changing world : Reflections from ICTD2010/2012. Information Technologies & International Development, 9(1), 49–54. Retrieved from http://itidjournal.org/itid/article/view/1030
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2017). ICT4D research: Reflections on history and future agenda. Information Technology for Development. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing : A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (2009, October). Research on ICT for development: Some reflections. In 3rd International development informatics association conference, 28–30 October, Berg-en-dal Camp, Kruger National Park, South Africa, pp. 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246. Retrieved from http://org.sagepub.com/content/7/2/225.short doi: 10.1177/135050840072002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zack, M. H. (1998). What knowledge-problems can information technology help to solve? In E. Hoadley & I. Benbasat (Eds.), Americas conference on information systems (pp. 664–646). Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1643&context=amcis1998
   Google Scholar
• Ziemba, E., & Papaj, T. (2013, June). A pragmatic approach to the e-government maturity in Poland – implementation and usage of SEKAP. In In European conference on e-government, academic conferences international limited (pp. 560–570). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1400450814?pq-origsite=gscholar
   Google Scholar