Governing nonprofit platform ecosystems – an information platform for refugees

References

• Adeleke, I. A., & AbdulRahman, A. (2011). Co-creation of value: Applying the paradigm to government e-service. Paper presented at the international conference on research and innovation in information systems, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A. (2007). Open access towards bridging the digital divide – policies and strategies for developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 13(4), 337–361. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20067
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, A. D., & Doolin, B. (2016). Information and communication technology and the social inclusion of refugees. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 405–416. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajwa, D., Lewis, F., Pervan, G., & Lai, V. (2014). E-Collaboration impacts in Australia and Hong Kong. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 45–58. doi: 10.3127/ajis.v18i2.845
   Google Scholar
• Balta, D., Greger, V., Wolf, P., & Krcmar, H. (2015). E-government stakeholder analysis and management based on stakeholder interactions and resource dependencies. Paper presented at the Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Manoa, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 11, 235–246. doi: 10.1080/026839696345289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R. (2003). Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 596–615. doi: 10.1177/0899764003258102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benlian, A., Hilkert, D., & Hess, T. (2015). How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 209–228. doi: 10.1057/jit.2015.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blohm, I., Bretschneider, U., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2011). Does collaboration among participants lead to better ideas in IT-based idea competitions? An empirical investigation. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 9(2), 106–122. doi: 10.1504/IJNVO.2011.042413
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. G., Scott Poole, M., & Rodgers, T. L. (2004). Interpersonal traits, complementarity, and trust in virtual collaboration. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(4), 115–138. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caidi, N., Allard, D., & Quirke, L. (2010). Information practices of immigrants. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 491–531. doi: 10.1002/aris.2010.1440440118
   Google Scholar
• Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & Egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. The RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309–328. doi: 10.2307/1593720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Fu, S., & Druckenmiller, D. (2016). Trust development in globally distributed collaboration: A case of U.S. and Chinese mixed teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(4), 978–1007. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2016.1267521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Nolan, T., & Macaulay, L. (2013). Don't give up the community: A viewpoint of trust development in online collaboration. Information Technology & People, 26(3), 298–318. doi: 10.1108/ITP-10-2012-0116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Yin, G., Azadegan, A., & Kolfschoten, G. (2016). Trust evolvement in hybrid team collaboration: A longitudinal case study. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(2), 267–288. doi: 10.1007/s10726-015-9442-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., & Yu, J. (2015). Designing of a mobile collaboration application for student collaborative group work: Evidence from China. Paper presented at the 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Manoa, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, R. M., Martinsons, M. G., & Kock, N. (2004). Principles of canonical action research. Information Systems Journal, 14(1), 65–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00162.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Laat, P. B. (2007). Governance of open source software: State of the art. Journal of Management and Governance, 11(2), 165–177. doi: 10.1007/s10997-007-9022-9
   Google Scholar
• De Vreede, G. J., Mgaya, R. J., & Qureshi, S. (2003). Field experiences with collaboration technology: A comparative study in Tanzania and South Africa. Information Technology for Development, 10(3), 201–219. doi: 10.1002/itdj.1590100306
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, B. D. (2012). The dynamics of digital platform innovation: Unfolding the paradox of control and generativity in Apple's iOS (Dissertation). London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, B. D. (2015). Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 217–243. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Opening platforms: How, when and why? In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 131–162). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2016). Asylum statistics. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Asylum_statistics
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2010). Failure to launch: Critical mass in platform businesses. Review of Network Economics, 9(4), 1–25. doi: 10.2202/1446-9022.1256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezz, I., Papazafeiropoulou, A., & Serrano, A. (2009). Challenges of interorganizational collaboration for information technology adoption: Insights from a governmental financial decision-making process in Egypt. Information Technology for Development, 15(3), 209–223. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. (2009). Platforms, markets and innovation: An introduction. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 1–16). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbach, T., & Benlian, A. (2015a). How informal control modes affect developers’ trust in a platform vendor and platform stickiness. Paper presented at the 12th international conference on wirtschaftsinformatik, Osnabrück, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Goldbach, T., & Benlian, A. (2015b). How social capital facilitates clan control on software platforms to enhance App- developers’ performance and success. Paper presented at the thirty sixth international conference on information systems, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, V., & Kohli, R. (2012). Cocreating IT value: New capabilities and metrics for multifirm environments. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatakka, M. (2009). Build it and they will come? Inhibiting factors for reuse of open content in developing countries. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 37, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer, 41(6), 26–33. doi: 10.1109/MC.2008.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Multiple-case analysis on governance mechanisms of multi-sided platforms. Paper presented at the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Ilmenau, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hurni, T., & Huber, T. (2014). The interplay of power and trust in platform ecosystems of the enterprise application software industry. Paper presented at the twenty second European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., & Finkelstein, A. (2009). Business network management as a survival strategy: A tale of two software ecosystems. Paper presented at the first workshop on software ecosystems, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, T. K., & Fichman, M. (2012). Multihoming users’ preferences for two-sided exchange networks. MIS Quarterly, 2(3), 977–996.
   Google Scholar
• Kuk, G., & Janssen, M. (2013). Assembling infrastructures and business models for service design and innovation. Information Systems Journal, 23(5), 445–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2014). Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 796–816. doi: 10.1287/isre.2014.0536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M., Li, S., & Whinston, A. B. (2011). Innovation and price competition in a two-sided market. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(2), 171–202. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222280207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. Z., Au, Y. A., & Choi, H. S. (2014). Effects of freemium strategy in the mobile App market: An empirical study of Google play. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(3), 1–3. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2014.995564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loudon, M. (2016). A platform studies approach to the role of technology in the ICTD ecosystem: The SMS in m4d interventions. Information Technology for Development, 22(suppl. 1), 7–25. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2015.1121858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loudon, M., & Rivett, U. (2014). Enacting openness in ICT4D research. In M. L. Smith & K. M. A. Reilly (Eds.), Open development: Networked innovations in international development (pp. 53–78). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant-logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Markus, M. L., & Wareham, J. (2016). Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 267–277. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2016/40:2.03
   Google Scholar
• Manner, J., Nienaber, D., & Schermann, M. (2013). Six principles for governing mobile platforms. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L. (2007). The governance of free/open source software projects: Monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? Journal of Management and Governance, 11(2), 151–163. doi: 10.1007/s10997-007-9021-x
   Google Scholar
• Mathiassen, L. (2002). Collaborative practice research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 14, 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, E. H., & Yoos, C. J. (2016). Information about information: A taxonomy of views. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 329–344.
   Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S. (2013). Information technology and product/service innovation: A brief assessment and some suggestions for future research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(4), 215–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Mahony, S., & Ferrarro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079–1106. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.27169153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Malley, J. (2015). Surprised that Syrian refugees have smartphones? Sorry to break this to you, but you're an idiot. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/surprised-that-syrian-refugees-have-smartphones-well-sorry-to-break-this-to-you-but-youre-an-idiot-10489719.html
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S. L., Pan, G., & Leidner, D. E. (2012). Crisis response information networks. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflügler, C., Schreieck, M., Hernandez, G., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2016). A concept for the architecture of an open platform for modular mobility services in the smart city. Transportation Research Procedia, 19, 199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.080
   Google Scholar
• Qayyum, M. A., Thompson, K. M., Kennan, M. A., & Lloyd, A. (2015). The provision and sharing of information between service providers and settling refugees. Information Research, 19(2), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S. (2015). Are we making a better world with information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) research? Findings from the field and theory building. Information Technology for Development, 21(4), 511–522. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2015.1080428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagers, G. (2004). The influence of network governance factors on success in open source software development projects. Paper presented at the twenty-fifth international conference on information systems, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Hakes, C., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2017). Governing platforms in the internet of things. Paper presented at the international conference on software business, Essen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., & Wiesche, M. (2017). How established companies leverage IT platforms for value co-creation – insights from banking. Paper presented at the twenty-fifth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Hein, A., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Governance of nonprofit platforms – onboarding mechanisms for a refugee information platform. Paper presented at the SIG GlobDev Ninth Annual Workshop, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Design and governance of platform ecosystems – Key concepts and issues for future research. Paper presented at the twenty-fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Zitzelsberger, J., Siepe, S., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2017). Supporting refugees in every Day life – intercultural design evaluation of an application for local information. Paper presented at the twenty first Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Langkawi, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, A., & Hirschheim, R. (2003). An extended platform logic perspective of IT governance: Managing perceptions and activities of IT. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(2), 129–166. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8687(03)00021-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander, L., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2016). Digital action repertoires and transforming a social movement organization. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 331–352. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, S. K. (2006). Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52(7), 1000–1014. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 582–603. doi: 10.2307/2392581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, J., & Lin, T.Collaboration in the open-source arena: The WebKit case. Paper presented at the 52nd ACM Conference on Computers and People Research, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary – platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. doi: 10.1287/isre.1100.0323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNHCR. (2015). Mid-year trends 2015. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/statistics/unhcrstats/56701b969/mid-year-trends-june-2015.html
   Google Scholar
• WordPress. (2016). WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website, blog, or app. Retrieved from https://wordpress.org/
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research – design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M. (2001). Improving practice through action research. Adult Learning, 12, 3–4. doi: 10.1177/104515950101200102
   Google Scholar