Tech hubs, innovation and development

References

• Acs, Z. J., & Amoros, J. E. (2008). Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 323–339. doi: 10.1007/s11187-008-9134-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. doi: 10.1287/isre.9.2.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnete Alsos, G., Ljunggren, E., & Hytti, U. (2013). Gender and innovation: State of the art and a research agenda. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 236–256. doi: 10.1108/IJGE-06-2013-0049
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002). The key to success in innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 187–206. doi: 10.1142/S1363919602000550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altan-Olcay, Ö. (2014). Entrepreneurial subjectivities and gendered complexities: Neoliberal citizenship in Turkey. Feminist Economics, 20(4), 235–259. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2014.950978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altenburg, T. (2009). Building inclusive innovation systems in developing countries: Challenges for IS research. In K. J. J. Lundvall & C. Chaminade (Eds.), Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: Building domestic capabilities in a global context (pp. 33–57). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, A., Grönlund, Å, & Wicander, G. (2012). Development as freedom – how the capability approach can be used in ICT4D research and practice. Information Technology for Development, 18(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2011.632076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annika, A., & Hatakka, M. (2013). What are we doing? Theories used in ICT4D research. 12th international conference on social implications of computers in developing countries (pp. 282–300).
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 1(23), 248–261.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, F. L., Voss, H., Lederer, S., & Bachtrog, C. (2012). Determinants of national innovation systems: Policy implications for developing countries. Innovation-Management Policy & Practice, 14(1), 2–18. doi: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo. vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y. A. (2012). What is frugal, what is innovation? Towards a theory of frugal innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, M. K., & Hanson, S. (2005). Rethinking innovation: Context and gender. Environment and Planning A, 37(4), 681–701. doi: 10.1068/a3710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, S. W., Mcmullen, J. S., Artz, K., & Simiyu, E. M. (2012). Capital is not enough: Innovation in developing economies. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 684–717. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, H. E., Ilavarasan, V. P., & Levy, M. R. (2015). Mattering matters: Agency, empowerment, and mobile phone use by female microentrepreneurs. Information Technology for Development, 21(4), 523–542. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2013.839437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuttur, M. Y. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Indiana University. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37).
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1993). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1279. doi: 10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, D., & Robeyns, I. (2009). Capability and agency. In C. W. Morris (Ed.), Amartya Sen (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus, pp. 60–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of Use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejaeghere, J., & Baxter, A. (2014). Entrepreneurship education for youth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A capabilities approach as an alternative framework to neoliberalism’s individualizing risks. Progress in Development Studies, 14(1), 61–76. doi: 10.1177/1464993413504353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguid, P. (2005). “The Art of knowing” social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21, 109–118. doi: 10.1080/01972240590925311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. (2009). Innovation: A guide to the literature. In J. Fagerberg & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 1–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. (2001). Communities of interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems. In Proceedings of the 24th IRIS conference, 2001 (Vol. 1, pp. 1–13). Bergen: Department of Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C. (2014). Does quality matter for innovations in low income markets? The case of the Kenyan mobile phone sector. Technology in Society, 38, 119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising inclusive innovation: Modifying systems of innovation frameworks to understand diffusion of new technology to Low-income consumers. European Journal of Development Research, 25(3), 333–355. doi: 10.1057/ejdr.2013.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems – complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191–211. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathege, D., & Moraa, H. (2013). Draft report on comparative study on innovation Hubs across Africa. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a585/e90094dbd5eee4b3f527642912b2d00a21c1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• George, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01048.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gitau, S., Plantinga, P., & Diga, K. (2010). ICTD research by Africans: Origins, interests, and impact. London: ICTD.
   Google Scholar
• GIZ. (2013). Technology hubs – creating space for change: Africa’s technology innovation hubs. Bonn: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, T., & Naudé, W. (2011). Entrepreneurship and human development: A capability approach. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 216–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GSMA Mobile for Development. (2014). Digital entrepreneurship in Kenya. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wpcontent/uploads/2014/02/Digital-Entrepreneurship-in-Kenya-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J., Matos, S., Sheehan, L., & Silvestre, B. (2012). Entrepreneurship and innovation at the base of the pyramid: A recipe for inclusive growth or social exclusion? Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 785–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01044.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardwick, J., Anderson, A. R., & Cruickshank, D. (2013). Trust formation processes in innovative collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(1), 4–21. doi: 10.1108/14601061311292832
   Google Scholar
• Hatakka, M., & Lagsten, J. (2012). Information technology for development: The capability approach as a tool for development evaluation – analyzing students’ use of internet resources. Information Technology & People, 18(1), 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S. S. (2006). From individual to collective capabilities: The capability approach as a conceptual framework for self-help. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 397–416. doi: 10.1080/14649880600815982
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S. S. (2013). Collectivity in the capability approach. Special issue of Maitreyee, the e-bulletin of the HDCA (June 2013). Retrieved from https://hd-ca.org/publications/maitreyee-june-2013-collectivity-in-the-ca
   Google Scholar
• InfoDev. (2014). The business models of mLabs and mHubs – an evaluation of InfoDev’s mobile innovation support pilots. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kayal, A. A. (2008). National innovation systems a proposed framework for developing countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8(1), 74–86. doi: 10.1504/IJEIM.2008.018615
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, T., & Firestone, R. (2016). How tech hubs are helping to drive economic growth in Africa. Background Paper for the World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Retrieved May 30, 2017, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/626981468195850883/How-tech-hubs-are-helping-to-drive-economic-growth-in-Africa
   Google Scholar
• Kesidou, E., & Romijn, H. (2008). Do local knowledge spillovers matter for development? An empirical study of Uruguay’s software cluster. World Development, 36(10), 2004–2028. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, D. (2013). Technologies of choice? ICTs, development and the capabilities approach. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleine, D., Light, A., & Montero, M. J. (2012). Signifiers of the life we value? Considering human development, technologies and fair trade from the perspective of the capabilities approach. Information Technology for Development, 18(1), 42–60. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2011.643208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, N. (2011). Culture and trust in fostering knowledge-sharing. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 328–339.
   Google Scholar
• London, T. (2008). The base-of-The-pyramid perspective: A New approach to poverty alleviation. Academy of management proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. National systems of innovation towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). National innovation systems – analytical concept and development tool. Industry & Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. doi: 10.1080/13662710601130863
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2009). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries (pp. 360–379). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mamykina, L., Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2002). Collaborative creativity. Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 91–95. doi: 10.1145/570907.570940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mario, P., & Shanker, D. (2014). Social Construction of Innovation Narratives: Implications for Management Studies (No. 457). IIM Bangalore Research Paper No. 457. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2422759
   Google Scholar
• Mccormick, D. (2011). Innovation hubs and small and medium enterprises in Africa: A critical review of issues. In African development bank annual meeting. Nairobi. Revised version presented at the African Intern. Retrieved from https://profiles.uonbi.ac.ke/dmccormick/publications/%E2%80%98innovation-hubsand-small-and-medium-enterprises-africa-critical-review-iss
   Google Scholar
• Naudé, W. W. (2013). Entrepreneurship and economic development: Theory, evidence and policy. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7507. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp7507.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1997). National innovation systems. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, M. (2013). Frugality, grassroots and inclusiveness?: New challenges for mainstream innovation theories. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation & Development, 5(6), 469–478. doi: 10.1080/20421338.2013.820445
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. A. (1999). Reimagining the nation: Community, difference, and national identities among indigenous and mestizo provincials in Ecuador. Environment and Planning, 31(1), 37–52. doi: 10.1068/a310037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, J. (2009). A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. Foucault Studies, (6), 25–36. doi: 10.22439/fs.v0i0.2465
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. (2016). Women’s use of participatory video technology to tackle gender inequality in Zambia’s ICT sector. ICTD 2016 proceedings of the eighth international conference on information and communication technologies and development, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2000). An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? Sen’s capability approach re-examined. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. doi: 10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations 4th ed. Technovation (Vol. 2). New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, S. A. (2009). Negotiating the symbolic power of information and communication technologies (ICT): The spread of internet-supported distance education. Information Technology for Development, 15(1), 17–31. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934/1962). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Common knowledge (Vol. 9). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2002). Why health equity? Health Economics, 11, 659–666. doi: 10.1002/hec.762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas, S., & Sutz, J. (2008). Developing countries and innovation: Searching for a new analytical approach. Technology in Society, 30(2), 129–140. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, F. (2004). Groups and capabilities. Paper prepared for the “Fourth Conference on the Capability Approach: Enhancing Human Security” to be held at the University of Pavia, Italy, from 5–7 September 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Steyaert, C., & Katz, J. (2004). Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: Geographical, discursive and social dimensions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(3), 179–196. doi: 10.1080/0898562042000197135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, A., & Dahlman, C. (2007). Promoting inclusive innovation (India). The international bank for reconstruction and development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, T. R. (2012). Sen’s capability approach. In J. Feiser & B. Dowden (Eds.), Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/sen-cap/
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. D. A., & Woodson, T. S. (2012). The future of innovation studies in less economically developed countries. Minerva, 50(2), 221–237. doi: 10.1007/s11024-012-9200-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, X., Califf, C. B., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2013). ICT innovation in emerging economies: A review of the existing literature and a framework for future research. Journal of Information Technology, 28(4), 264–278. doi: 10.1057/jit.2013.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Research-Technology Management, 54(4), 38–45. doi: 10.5437/08956308X5404007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. (2009). Different spaces for e-development: What can we learn from the capability approach? Information Technology for Development, 15(2), 66–82. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. (2015). ICT4D, Overview of theories in. In The international encyclopedia of digital communication and society (pp. 1–10). Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs153/abstract
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Stahl, B. C. (2011). Technology, capabilities and critical perspectives: What can critical theory contribute to Sen’s capability approach? Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 69–80. doi: 10.1007/s10676-011-9264-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Walsham, G. (2008). Inequality of what? Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation. Information Technology & People, 21(3), 222–243. doi: 10.1108/09593840810896000
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Yu, A. (2016). Affordances of social media in collective action: The case of free lunch for children in China. Information Systems Journal, 26(3), 289–313. doi: 10.1111/isj.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar