The dominant role of governing structure in cross-sector collaboration in developing China: two case studies of information integration in local government one-stop services

References

• Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 56–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2014). The multiple facets of co-production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Management Review, 16(3), 299–316. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.806578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anninck, W., & Lucidarme, S. (2014). Pitfalls and challenges for trust and effectiveness in collaborative networks. Public Management Review, 16(5), 733–760. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.744426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson, R., & Axelsson, S. B. (2006). Integration and collaboration in public health – a conceptual framework. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 21(1), 75–88. doi: 10.1002/hpm.826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidwell, R. D., & Ryan, C. M. (2006). Collaborative partnership design: The implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnerships. Society and Natural Resources, 19(9), 827–843. doi: 10.1080/08941920600835585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Straussman, J. D. (1990). Public management strategies: Guidelines for managerial effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(ss5), 647–663. doi: 10.1111/puar.12432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulfield, J. L. (2006). Local government reform in China: A rational actor perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(2), 253–267. doi: 10.1177/0020852306064613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. Y., Brudney, J. L., & Jang, S-G. (2013). Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 687–701. doi: 10.1111/puar.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, D., Zhang, J., & Faerman, S. (2008). The paradoxical nature of collaboration. In L. B. Bingham, & R. O’Leary (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 17–35). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance. Public Administration Review, 68(4), S86–S102. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S, & Préfontaine, L. (2003). Delivering government services. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 41. doi: 10.1145/602421.602444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dormady, N. C. (2013). The political economy of collaborative organization. Administration & Society, 45(6), 748–772. doi: 10.1177/0095399712438373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durant, R. F. (2015). Whither power in public administration? Attainment, dissipation, and loss. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 206–218. doi: 10.1111/puar.12332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K, Nabatchi, T, & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezz, I., Papazafeiropoulou, A., & Serrano, A. (2009). Challenges of inter-organizational collaboration for information technology adoption: Insights from a governmental financial decision-making process in Egypt. Information Technology for Development, 15(3), 209–223. doi: 10.1002/itdj.20123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorowicz, J., Gogan, J. L., & Williams, C. B. (2007). A collaborative network for first responders: Lessons from the CapWIN case. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 785–807. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G (1999). The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32(4), 701–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadot, E. V. (2003). Managing collaboration in public administration: The promise of alliance among governance, citizens, and businesses. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Gazley, B. (2008). Beyond the contract: The scope and nature of informal government–nonprofit partnerships. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 141–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00844.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, J. R., Smith, C., & Duchessi, P. (2007). Collaborative e-government: Impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 121–133. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1159–1175. doi: 10.2307/1556343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hvinden, B. (1994). Divided against itself: A study of integration in welfare bureaucracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T. (2005). Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281–320. doi: 10.1177/0095399705276111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jae Moon, M., Lee, J., & Roh, C. Y. (2014). The evolution of internal IT applications and e-government studies in public administration: Research themes and methods. Administration & Society, 46(1), 3–36. doi: 10.1177/0095399712459723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joia, L. A. (2004). Developing government-to-government enterprises in Brazil: A heuristic model drawn from multiple case studies. International Journal of Information Management, 24(2), 147–166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2003.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., & Garayev, V. (2013). Designing, managing, and sustaining functionally collaborative emergency management networks. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 312–330. doi: 10.1177/0275074012444719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 10–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00662.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. doi: 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, N. E. (1949). Power and administration. Public Administration Review, 9(4), 257–264. doi: 10.2307/972337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., Chung, J., & Thorson, S. (2005). E-government in China: Bringing economic development through administrative reform. Government Information Quarterly, 22(1), 20–37. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2004.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D. P., Faerman, S. R., & Hart, D. W. (1995). The appeal and difficulties of participative systems. Organization Science, 6(6), 603–627. doi: 10.1287/orsc.6.6.603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, J. (2003). Management information systems: Managing information technology in the business enterprise (6th ed.). NewYork, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Towards a (public) service dominant approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158. doi: 10.1177/0275074012466935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 41–52. doi: 10.2307/976691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., Gazley, B., McGuire, M., & Bingham, L. B. (2009). Public managers in collaboration. In R. O’Leary, & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century (pp. 1–12). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2014). Collective action and the sustainability of co-production. Public Management Review, 16(3), 383–401. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2005). Modes of network governance and implications for public network management. In the Proceedings of the Eighth National Public Management Research Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimers, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2008). The use of an explicitly theory-driven data coding method for high-level theory testing in IOIS. In the Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Essentials of organizational behavior (tenth ed.). Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, D. (2016). Managing collaborative paradox: Examining collaboration between head start and the Virginia preschool initiative. Administration & Society, 48(2), 190–215. doi: 10.1177/0095399714532269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (2000). Public administration in today’s world of organizations and markets. PS, Political Science & Politics, 33(4), 749–756. doi: 10.1017/S1049096500061953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Yuval, F. (2003). Managerial quality, administrative performance and trust in governance revisited: A follow-up study of causality. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(7), 502–522. doi: 10.1108/09513550310500382
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Ngok, K. (2006). Social policy between plan and market: Xiagang (off-duty employment) and the policy of the re-employment service centers in China. Social Policy & Administration, 40(1), 158–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00482.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Hefetz, A. (2008). Managing markets for public service: The role of mixed public–private delivery of city services. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 155–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00845.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1922). Bureaucracy. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 37–43). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C. (2009). Rebuilding government for the 21st century: Can China incrementally reform the public sector? China Quarterly, 200, 929–952. doi: 10.1017/S0305741009990567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., Guo, X., & Chen, G. (2011). Why adoption and use behavior of IT/IS cannot last? Two studies in China. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 381–395. doi: 10.1007/s10796-010-9288-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., Meng, Q., Guo, X., Yin, C., & Luo, H. (2015). Key e-government issues in China: An empirical study based on the orientation-maturity framework. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(3), 407–425. doi: 10.1007/s10660-015-9190-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., Zhao, X., Zhang, Z., Meng, Q., & Tan, H. (2017). What factors drive open innovation in China’s public sector? A case study of official document exchange via microblogging (ODEM) in haining. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 126–133. SSCI. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T. (2006). From intercity competition to collaborative planning: The case of the Yangtze River Delta region of China. Urban Affairs Review, 42(1), 26–56. doi: 10.1177/1078087406289555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar