Investigating critical success factors in online learning environments in higher education systems in the CaribbeanFootnote^*

* Kirstin Krauss is the accepting Associate Editor for this paper.

References

• Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Harbi, K. (2011). E-learning in the Saudi tertiary education: Potential and challenges. Applied Computing & Informatics, 9(1), 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-learning theoretical framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2001). Class section size, perceived classroom characteristics, instructor experience, and student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses: A study and comparison of two online MBA programs. In D. Nagao (Ed.), Academy of management best papers proceedings (pp. A1–A6) [CD-ROM]. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 12(1), 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Attuquayefio, S. N. B., Achampong, A. K., & Aryeetey, I. T. (2014). Extending TAM with social norm to model students’ intentions to adopt ICT. European Scientific Journal, 10(14), 435–446.
   Google Scholar
• Awidi, I. T., & Cooper, M. (2015). Using management procedure gaps to enhance e-learning implementation in Africa. Computers & Education, 90, 64–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, C., & Duggan, E. (2008). Rethinking the digital divide: Towards a path of digital effectiveness. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Waikoloa, HI (10 pp.).
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, C., & Logan, D. (2013). Towards an understanding of the implementation & adoption of massive online open courses (MOOCs) in a developing economy context. Proceedings of SIG GlobDev sixth annual workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, C., & Osei-Bryson, K. M. (2012). An analysis of students’ perceptions and attitudes to online learning use in higher education in Jamaica: An extension of TAM. ICIS conference proceedings. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/globdev2012/4
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, J. (2006). Effects of a long-duration, professional development academy on technology skills, computer self-efficacy, and technology integration beliefs and practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 22–43.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M. (1996). The role of internal and external factors in the discontinuation of off-campus students. Distance Education, 17(1), 44–71.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, P. Y. (2001). Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage behavior. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 13(1), 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. H., & Chengalur-Smith, I. (2015). Factors influencing students’ use of a library web portal: Applying course-integrated information literacy instruction as an intervention. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, C.-M., Chiu, C.-S., & Chang, H.-C. (2007). Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners? Satisfaction and web-based learning continuance intention. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 271–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, C. (2001). The phenomenon of on-line learning. European Journal of Education, 36(2), 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duman, T., Kocak, G. N., & Tutuncu, O. (2006). The role of non-monetary costs in a model of leisure travel value. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., Jarkey, N., Mahony, M. J., Peat, M., & Sheely, S. (2007). Managing quality improvement of eLearning in a large, campus-based university. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(1), 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Elloumi, F. (2004). Value chain analysis: A strategic approach to online learning. In A. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 61–92). Athabasca: Athabasca University.
   Google Scholar
• Fencl, H., & Scheel, K. (2005). Engaging students: An examination of the effects of teaching strategies on self-efficacy and course climate in a nonmajors physics course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(1), 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal Of Marketing Research, 19, 440–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Cha, J. (1994). Partial least squares. In R. P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Advanced methods Of marketing research (pp. 52–78). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal Of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners drop out. Workforce, 10, 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2004). Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61, 101–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, W. (1995). Stuck at the barricades: Can information technology really enter the mainstream of teaching and learning? Change, 27(2), 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Golladay, R., Prybutok, V., & Huff, R. (2000). Critical success factors for the online learner. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 40(4), 69–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2015). Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2004). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 139.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics, & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), Advances in international marketing (pp. 277–319). West Yorkshire: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2005). Education goes digital: The evolution of online learning and the revolution in higher education. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein, R., Aditiawarman, U., & Mohamed, N. (2007). E-learning acceptance in a developing country: A case of the Indonesian Open University. Paper presented at the German e-science conference. Retrieved from http://edoc.mpg.de/316634
   Google Scholar
• Internet World Stats. (2015). Jamaica internet usage and population statistics. Retrieved from https://www.internetworldstats.com/car/jm.htm
   Google Scholar
• Internet World Stats. (2016). Internet usage and population in the Caribbean: June 30, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats11.htm
   Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Park, S. Y. (2011). Investigating the structural relationships among organisational support, learning flow, learners’ satisfaction and learning transfer in corporate e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 973–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 811–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohang, A., & Durante, A. (2003). Learners’ perceptions toward the web-based distance learning activities/assignments portion of an undergraduate hybrid instructional model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2, 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2004). Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Mcgraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, L. (2003). Is e-learning effective for IT training? T+D, 57(6), 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Yoon, J., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320–1329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers Education, 48(2), 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, S., Huang, H., & Chen, G. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4/12), 1066–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M. H. (2016). Blending a class video blog to optimize student learning outcomes in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N. K., & Cheng, X. (2008). An evaluation of the learning of undergraduates using e-learning in a tertiary institution in China. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), 427–447.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmoller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, L., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2004). Student acceptance of a web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(1), 7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C. H., & Perreault, W. D. J. (1991). Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 268–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R., & Weller, M. (2000). Factors affecting students’ satisfaction on a web course. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 173–200.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. (1999–2000). Improved training methods through the use of multimedia technology. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 40(2), 17–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen, T. (1997). Communication training in corporate settings: Lessons and opportunities for the academe. Mid-American Journal of Business, 12(1), 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., & Nunes, M. (2006). Organisational issues for e-learning critical success factors as identified by HE practitioners. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(7), 542–558.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, C.-S., Lai, J.-Y., & Wang, Y.-S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, 41, 795–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otter, R. R., Seipel, S., Graeff, T., Alexander, B., Boraiko, C., Gray, J., … Sadler, K. (2013). Comparing student and faculty perceptions of online and traditional courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y.-K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47, 222–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, I. A., Ilyas, K., Yasmin, R., & Whitty, M. (2012). Challenges of implementing e-learning in a Pakistani university. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 4(3), 310–324.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, R. T., Ellis, W. W., & Abdon, B. R. (2002). Multisectoral partnerships in e-learning: A potential force for improved human capital development in the Asia pacific. Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 217–229.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 M3. Hamburg: SmartPLS.
   Google Scholar
• Rohleder, P., Bozalek, V., Carolissen, R., Leibowitz, B., & Swartz, L. (2008). Students’ evaluations of the use of e-learning in a collaborative project between two South African universities. Higher Education, 56(1), 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ros, S., Hernández, R., Caminero, A., Robles, A., Barbero, I., Maciá, A., & Holgado, F. P. (2015). On the use of extended TAM to assess students’ acceptance and intent to use third-generation learning management systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1250–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadé, R. G. (2003). Web-based education information system for enhanced learning, EISL: Student assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2, 267–277.
   Google Scholar
• Saadé, R. G., He, X., & Kira, D. (2007). Exploring dimensions to online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1721–1739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selim, H. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers & Education, 40, 343–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serwatka, J. (2003). Assessment in on-line CIS courses. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(3), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Shraim, K., & Khlaif, Z. (2010). An e-learning approach to secondary education in Palestine: Opportunities and challenges. Information Technology for Development, 16(3), 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumarova, E., & Swatman, P. A. (2007). Evalue and value-driven user responses to information technology. Electronic Markets, 17(1), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Smedley, J. K. (2010). Modelling the impact of knowledge management using technology. OR Insight, 23(4), 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., & Rao, L. (2012, August 9–12). Lessons learned from introducing a learning management system to support face to face and blended learning courses in an MBA programme (Paper 7). Proceedings of the Eighteenth Americas conference on information systems, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• So, S. (2016). Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 32–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Kong, S. C. (2017). Affordances and constraints of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) for learning and teaching in higher education: Teachers' perspectives. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 39–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soong, B. M. H., Chan, H. C., Chua, B. C., & Loh, K. F. (2001). Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Computers & Education, 36(2), 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, J., Pawlowski, J. M., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2015). A barrier framework for open e-learning in public administrations. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(Part B), 674–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, E. F. (1978). Research methods in organizational behavior. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36(2), 111–147.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarus, J. K., Gichoya, D., & Muumbo, A. (2015). Challenges of implementing e-learning in Kenya: A case of Kenyan public universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2011). Modeling the determinants of pre-service teachers’ perceived usefulness of e-learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 28(2), 124–140.
   Google Scholar
• Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50, 838–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, F. D., & Davis, G. B. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216–223.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Ran, W., Liao, J., & Yang, S. J. H. (2010). A performance-oriented approach to e-learning in the workplace. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2008). Understanding citizen’s continuance intention to use e-government website: A composite view of technology acceptance model and computer self-efficacy. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 6(1), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Williams, J. (2010). Evaluating a model of business school students’ acceptance of web-based course management systems. The International Journal of Management Education, 8(3), 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Wisneski, J. E., Ozogul, G., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2017). Investigating the impact of learning environments on undergraduate students’ academic performance in a prerequisite and post-requisite course sequence. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, H. (1966). Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2008). Analysis of e-learning innovation and core capability using a hypercube model. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1851–1866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, M., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, S. J., Huang, W.-H., & Lee, D. Y. (2012). The impact of employee’s perception of organizational climate on their technology acceptance toward e-learning in South Korea. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 4(3), 359–378.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker, J. (2004). Can e-learning replace traditional classroom learning—Evidence and implication of the evolving e-learning technology. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar