References
- Alter, S. (2013). Work system theory: Overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(2), 72–121. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00323
- Barclay, C. (2014). Using frugal innovations to support cybercrime legislations in small developing states: Introducing the cyber-legislation development and implementation process model (CyberLeg-DPM). Information Technology for Development, 20(2), 165–195. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2013.841630
- Commonwealth Secretariat. (2015) Commonwealth Secretariat annual results report 2014/2015, The Commonwealth. Retrieved from http://thecommonwealth.org/sites/default/files/inline/ARR-2014-15-FINAL-print-version.pdf
- Davison, R., & Martinsons, M. (2016). Context is king! Considering particularism in research design and reporting. Journal of Information Technology, 31(3), 241–249. doi: 10.1057/jit.2015.19
- Drechsler, A., & Hevner, A. (2016, May 23–25). A four-cycle model of IS design science research: Capturing the dynamic nature of IS artifact design. In Breakthroughs and emerging insights from ongoing design science projects: Research-in-progress papers and poster presentations from the 11th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (DESRIST) 2016. St. John, Canada.
- Grobler, M., & de Villiers, C. (2017). Shaping solutions with a community: The research design using design science research (DSR) and case study research with an ICT4D project. Conf-IRM 2017 Proceedings. AIS E-Library.
- Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. doi: 10.2307/25148625
- Islam, M. S., & Grönlund, Å. (2011, October). Applying design science approach in ICT4D research. In European design science symposium (pp. 132–143). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Kositanurit, B., Osei-Bryson, K.-M., & Ngwenyama, O. (2011). Re-examining information systems user performance: Using data mining to identify properties of IS that lead to highest levels of user performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7041–7050. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.011
- Li, Y., Thomas, M. A., Rana, S. S., & Stoner, D. (2017). Continuing medical education on a stick: Nepal as a test bed. In International conference on social implications of computers in developing countries (pp. 394–409). Springer.
- Mullarkey, M. T., Hevner, A. R., & Ågerfalk, P. (2019). An elaborated action design research process model. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(1), 6–20. doi: 10.1080/0960085X.2018.1451811
- Myers, M. D., & Venable, J. R. (2014). A set of ethical principles for design science research in information systems. Information & Management, 51(6), 801–809. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.01.002
- Ngonzi, T. (2010). Enhancing design science for social development. In J. Steyn, W. Chigona, K. Sewchurran, R. Matavire, & M. Mimbi (Eds.), Exploring success and failure in development informatics: Innovation, research and practice: Proceedings of the 4th international development informatics conference (IDIA) IDIA2011 conference proceedings. Cape Town.
- Osei-Bryson, K.-M., & Ngwenyama, O. (2011). Using decision tree modelling to support Peircian abduction in IS research: A systematic approach for generating and evaluating hypotheses for systematic theory development. Information Systems Journal, 21(5), 407–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00368.x
- Osei-Bryson, K.-M., & Ngwenyama, O. (2014). Advances in research methods for information systems research. New York, NY: Springer.
- Pal, J. (2017, May). CHI4Good or Good4CHI. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 709–721). ACM.
- Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
- Peirce, C. (1974). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Popper, K. R. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Harper Torch Books.
- Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56. doi: 10.2307/23043488
- Smith, R., & Turpin, M. (2017, May). Design science research and activity theory in ICT4D: Developing a Socially relevant ICT platform for Elderly women in Remote Rural South Africa. In International conference on social implications of computers in developing countries (pp. 345–356). Cham: Springer.
- Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
- Uwaoma, C., & Mansingh, G. (2018). Proposing a decision support system for automated mobile asthma monitoring in remote areas. Information Technology for Development, 24(2), 301–314. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2017.1310712
- Van Biljon, J., Marais, M., & Platz, M. (2017). Digital platforms for research collaboration: Using design science in developing a South African open knowledge repository. Information Technology for Development, 23(3), 463–485. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2017.1328654
- Winschiers-Theophilus, H., & Bidwell, N. J. (2013). Toward an Afro-Centric indigenous HCI paradigm. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(4), 243–255. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2013.765763