514
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Marginalization of indigenous voices in the information age: a case study of cell phones in the rural CongoFootnote*

References

  • Abraham, R. (2011). The poor are no different from us. Retrieved from The Economist website http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2011/10/reuben-abraham-market-solutions
  • Aker, J. C. (2010). Information from markets near and far: Mobile phones and agricultural markets in Niger. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 46–59.
  • Aker, J. C., & Blumenstock, E. J. (2015). The economic impacts of new technologies in Africa. In C. Monga & J. Y. Lin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Africa and economics: Vol. 2: Policies and practices (pp. 354–371). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Aker, J. C., & Mbiti, I. M. (2010). Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 207–232.
  • Alderete, M. V. (2017). Examining the ICT access effect on socioeconomic development: The moderating role of ICT use and skills. Information Technology for Development, 23(1), 42–58.
  • Alkire, S. (2016). The capability approach and well-being measurement for public policy. In M. D. Adler & M. Fleurbaey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of well-being and public policy (pp. 615–644). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Alkire, S., Foster, J., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M. & Ballon, P. (2015). Multidimensional poverty index: Measurement and analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Alkire, S., Roche, J. M., & Sumner, A. (2013). Where do the world’s multidimensionally poor people live? Oxford University Department of International Development OPHDI Working Papers No 61.
  • Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2013). Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: Robustness and scope of the Multidimensional Poverty Index. Oxford University Department of International Development OPHDI Working Papers No 59.
  • Andoh-Baidoo, F. K. (2017). Context-specific theorizing in ICT4D research. Information Technology for Development, 23(2), 195–211.
  • Andrews, E. A. (1860). A copious and critical Latin-English lexicon, founded on the larger Latin-German lexicon of Dr. William Freund (with additions and corrections from the lexicons of Gesner, Facciolati, Scheller, Georges, etc.). New York, NY: Harper.
  • Aristotle. (1933, 4th c. BC). Metaphysics (H. Tredennick, Trans.). New York, NY: G.P. Putnam.
  • Ashraf, M. (2015). A development impact assessment on the use of ICT (mobile phone) in rural areas of Bangladesh. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development, 7(1), 1–16.
  • Avgerou, C. (2010). Discourses on ICT and development. Information Technologies and International Development, 6(3), 1–18.
  • Avgerou, C. (2017). Theoretical framing of ICT4D research. In J. Choudrie, M. S. Islam, F. Wahid, J. M. Bass, & J. E. Priyatma (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies for Development: 14th IFIP WG 9.4 International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, ICT4D 2017, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, May 22–24, 2017 Proceedings (pp. 10–23). Cham: Springer.
  • Babbie, E. R. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
  • Bacon, F. (1597/1859). The works. Vol. 7. Literary and professional works Vol. 2 (Edited by J. Spedding, R. L. Ellis, & D. D. Heath). London: Longman Greene.
  • Bailur, S., Masiero, S., & Tacchi, J. (2018). Gender, mobile, and development: The theory and practice of empowerment. Information Technologies & International Development (Special Section), 14, 96–104.
  • Banaji, S., Livingstone, S., Nandi, A., & Stoilova, M. (2018). Instrumentalising the digital: Adolescents’ engagement with ICTs in low- and middle-income countries. Development in Practice, 28(3), 432–443.
  • Bansal, T. P., Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1189–1195.
  • Baro, E. E., & Endouware, B. C. (2013). The effects of mobile phone on the socio-economic life of the rural dwellers in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Information Technology for Development, 19(3), 249–263.
  • Barrett, M., & Walsham, G. (2004). Making contributions from interpretive case studies: Examining processes of construction and use. In B. Kaplan, P. D. Truex, D. Wastell, T. A. Wood-Harper, & I. J. DeGross (Eds.), Information systems research: IFIP international Federation for information processing (Vol. 143, pp. 293–312). Boston, MA: Springer.
  • Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2012). Introduction to information science. London: Facet.
  • Bello-Bravo, J., Tamò, M., Dannon, E. A., & Pittendrigh, B. R. (2018). An assessment of learning gains from educational animated videos versus traditional extension presentations among farmers in Benin. Information Technology for Development, 24(2), 224–244.
  • Berger, A. A. (2020). Media and communication research methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Blumenstock, J. (2012). Inferring patterns of internal migration from mobile phone call records: Evidence from Rwanda. Information Technology for Development, 18(2), 107–125.
  • Bornman, E. (2016). Information society and digital divide in South Africa: Results of longitudinal surveys. Information, Communication & Society, 19(2), 264–278.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Cannella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2016). Deploying qualitative methods for critical social purposes. In G. S. Cannella, M. S. Pérez, & P. A. Pasque (Eds.), Critical qualitative inquiry: Foundations and futures (pp. 243–263). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Carmody, P. (2012). Informationalization of poverty in Africa: Mobile phones and economic structure. Information Technologies and International Development, 8(3), 1–17.
  • Carmody, P. (2013). A knowledge economy or an information society in Africa? Thintegration and the mobile phone revolution. Information Technology for Development, 19(1), 24–39.
  • Case, D. O., & Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (4th ed.). Bingley: Emerald.
  • Castells, M. (Ed.). (2010). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Vol. 1. The rise of the network society (2nd ed., with a new preface). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Castells, M. (Ed.). (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Polity Press.
  • Chatman, E. A. (1996). The impoverished life-world of outsiders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(3), 193–206.
  • Chowdhury, G. (2012). Building environmentally sustainable information services: A green is research agenda. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(4), 633–647.
  • Cibangu, S. K., & Hepworth, M. (2016). What ICT4D and information management researchers can learn from Paul Otlet’s notion of development. Information Development, 32(5), 1639–1656.
  • Cole, C. (2013). [Review of the book Theory in information behaviour research, by T. D Wilson]. Information Research, 18(3).
  • Cosgrove, L., Wheeler, E. E., & Kosterina, E. (2015). Quantitative methods: Science means and ends. In I. Parker (Ed.), Handbook of critical psychology (pp. 15–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Coyle, D. (2005). Overview. Africa: The impact of mobile phones. The Vodafone Policy Paper Series, No 3, pp. 3–9.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • De, R., Pal, A., Sethi, R., Reddy, S. K., & Chitre, C. (2018). ICT4D research: A call for a strong critical approach. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 63–94.
  • DeMaagd, K. (2008, December 13). Pervasive versus productive: The case of mobile phones in developing economies. Proceedings of SIG GlobDev’s First Annual Workshop, Paris, France.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018a). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 1–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018b). Preface. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. ix–xx). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018c). Locating the field. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 27–35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Diga, K., & May, J. (2016). The ICT ecosystem: The application, usefulness, and future of an evolving concept. Information Technology for Development, 22(sup1), 1–6.
  • Dillon, A. (2012). The emerging discipline of information. In D. Bawden, & L. Robinson (Eds.), Introduction to information science (pp. xvii–xix). London: Facet.
  • Donner, J. (2006). The use of mobile phones by microentrepreneurs in Kigali: Changes to social and business networks. Information Technologies and International Development, 3(2), 3–19.
  • Duncombe, R. (2012). Understanding mobile phone impact on livelihoods in developing countries: A new research framework. IDPM Development Informatics Working Paper no.48.
  • Eikhof, D. R., & Warhurst, C. (2013). The promised land? Why social inequalities are systemic in the creative industries. Employee Relations, 35(5), 495–508.
  • Ekbia, H. R. (2016). Digital inclusion and social exclusion: The political economy of value in a networked world. The Information Society, 32(3), 165–175.
  • Ellway, W. B. P., & Walsham, G. (2015). A doxa-informed practice analysis: Reflexivity and representations, technology and action. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 133–160.
  • Faik, I., & Walsham, G. (2013). Modernisation through ICTs: Towards a network ontology of technological change. Information Systems Journal, 23(4), 351–370.
  • Fanon, F. (1961/1963). The wretched of the earth (Preface by Jean-Paul Sartre, C. Farrington, Trans.). New York, NY: Grove Press.
  • Fidel, R. (2012). Human information interaction: An ecological approach to information behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Filgueira, C. H. (2001). Social development. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 3583–3587). New York, NY: Elsevier.
  • Flick, U. (2018). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Frias-Martinez, V., Virseda-Jerez, J., & Frias-Martinez, E. (2012). On the relation between socio-economic status and physical mobility. Information Technology for Development, 18(2), 91–106.
  • Furner, J. (2010). Philosophy and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 159–200.
  • Geser, H. (2006). Is the cell phone undermining the social order?: Understanding mobile technology from a sociological perspective. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, 19(1), 8–18.
  • Giugale, M. M. (2014). Economic development: What everyone needs to know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Given, L. M. (2016). 100 questions (and answers) about qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Glaser, B. G. (Ed.). (1996). Gerund grounded theory: The basic social process dissertation. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Gordon, J., & Patterson, J. A. (2013). Response to Tracy’s under the “Big Tent”: Establishing universal criteria for evaluating qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(9), 689–695.
  • Gough, N. (2005). Introduction. Africa: The impact of mobile phones. The Vodafone Policy Paper Series No 3, pp. 1–2.
  • Graham, C., & Nikolova, M. (2013). Does access to information technology make people happier? Insights from well-being surveys from around the world. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 44, 126–139.
  • Hassan, B., Unwin, T., & Gardezi, A. (2018). Understanding the darker side of ICTs: Gender, sexual harassment, and mobile devices in Pakistan. Information Technologies & International Development (Special Section), 14, 1–17.
  • Hatakka, M., Thapa, D., & Zhang, J. (2018, January 3–6). Introduction to “ICT4D: ICTs and sustainable development” minitrack. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 2403). Waikoloa Village, HI.
  • Heeks, R., Thapa, D., & Wall, P. J. (2018). Critical realism and ICT4D: Editorial introduction to the special issue of EJISDC. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(6), 1–4.
  • Heeks, R., & Wall, P. J. (2018). Critical realism and ICT4D research. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(6), 1–11.
  • Hjørland, B. (2010). The foundation of the concept of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 217–237.
  • Hjørland, B. (2014). Information science and its core concepts: Levels of disagreement. In F. Ibekwe-SanJuan & T. M. Dousa (Eds.), Theories of information, communication and knowledge: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 205–235). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Husserl, E. (1913a). Logische Untersuchungen: Zweiter Band. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. I. Teil (Zweite, umgearbeitete). Halle: Max Niemeyer.
  • Husserl, E. (1913b). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
  • Husserl, E. (1919/2002). Natur und Geist: Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1919. Husserliana Materialen Band XXVIII (hrsg. von Michael Weiler). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
  • Husserl, E. (1901/2005). Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Zweiter Teil. Texte für die Neufassung der VI. Untersuchung. Zur Phänomenologie des Ausdrucks und der Erkenntnis (1893/94–1921, hrsg. von Ulrich Melle). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
  • Ismail, S. A., Heeks, R., Nicholson, B., & Aman, A. (2018). Analyzing conflict and its management within ICT4D partnerships: An institutional logics perspective. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 165–187.
  • Jenaro, C., Flores, N., Cruz, M., Pérez, M. C., Vega, V., & Torres, V. A. (2018). Internet and cell phone usage patterns among young adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(2), 259–272.
  • Jiménez, A., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Tech hubs, innovation and development. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 95–118.
  • Klein, H., & Myers, M. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(1), 67–94.
  • Kleine, D. (2013). Technologies of choice: ICTs, development, and the capabilities approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2018). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 108–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Malhotra, A., Sharma, R., Srinivasan, R., & Mathew, N. (2018). Widening the arc of indigenous communication: Examining potential for use of ICT in strengthening social and behavior change communication efforts with marginalized communities in India. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(4), 1–15. doi:10.1002/isd2.12032.
  • Manly, B. F. J., & Navarro, J. A. A. (2015). Introduction. In B. F. J. Manly & J. A. A. Navarro (Eds.), Introduction to ecological sampling (pp. 1–5). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Mansell, R., & Manyozo, L. (2018). Introduction: The mediation of development. Development in Practice, 28(3), 325–331.
  • Maredia, M. K., Reyes, B., Ba, M. N., Dabire, C. L., Pittendrigh, B., & Bello-Bravo, J. (2018). Can mobile phone-based animated videos induce learning and technology adoption among low-literate farmers? A field experiment in Burkina Faso. Information Technology for Development, 24(3), 429–460.
  • Maree, J., Piontak, R., Omwansa, T., Shinyekwa, I., & Njenga, K. (2013). Developmental uses of mobile phones in Kenya and Uganda. Capturing the Gains, University of Manchester School of Environment and Development, Working Paper No. 35.
  • Marx, K. (1867/1977). Capital: A critique of political economy (B. Fowkes, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  • Marx, K. (1845/1978). These über Feuerbach. In Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus beim Zentralkomitee (ZK) der Kommunistischen Partei der Sowjetunion (KPdSU). In Karl Marx Friedrich Engels Werke (Vol. 3, pp. 5–7). Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
  • May, J., Dutton, V., & Munyakazi, L. (2014). Information and communication technologies as a pathway from poverty: Evidence from East Africa. In E. O. Adera, T. M. Waema, J. May, O. Mascarenhas, & K. Diga (Eds.), ICT pathways to poverty reduction: Empirical evidence from East and Southern Africa (pp. 33–52). Ottawa: IDRC.
  • McCaslin, L. M., & Scott, W. K. (2003). The five-question method for framing a qualitative research study. The Qualitative Report, 8(3), 447–461.
  • McDonald, S., Gan, B. C., Fraser, S. S., Oke, A., & Anderson, A. R. (2015). A review of research methods in entrepreneurship 1985–2013. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(3), 291–315.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/2014). Phenomenology of perception (Foreword by T. Carman, D.A. Landes, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mosse, D. (2013). The anthropology of international development. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 227–246.
  • Navarro, J. A. A., & Díaz-Gamboa, R. (2015). Line transect sampling. In B. F. J. Manly & J. A. A. Navarro (Eds.), Introduction to ecological sampling (pp. 47–61). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Nipo, D. A. T., Bujang, I., & Hassan, H. (2018). Global digital divide: Reassessing the evidence behind ICT and its contribution to trade among the ICT haves and have-nots in developing economies. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 12(3), 47–58.
  • Noske-Turner, J. (2018). Should the C4D expert survive? Rethinking expertise in communication and innovation. Development in Practice, 28(3), 444–451.
  • O’Donnell, A., & Sweetman, C. (2018). Introduction: Gender, development and ICTs. Gender & Development, 26(2), 217–229.
  • OECD. (2011). Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: Author.
  • OECD. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. Paris: Author.
  • Osei-Bryson, K.-M., & Bailey, A. (2019). Contextual reflections on innovations in an interconnected world: Theoretical lenses and practical considerations in ICT4D – part 2. Information Technology for Development, 25(1), 1–6.
  • Overå, R. (2006). Networks, distance and trust: Telecommunications development and changing trading practices in Ghana. World Development, 34, 1301–1315.
  • Pang, L. (2015). Art and cultural industries: Autonomy and community. In K. Oakley & J. O’Connor (Eds.), The Routledge companion to the cultural industries (pp. 45–55). London: Routledge.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Peet, R., & Hartwick, E. (2015). Theories of development: Contentions, arguments, alternatives (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Picatoste, J., Pérez-Ortiz, L., & Ruesga-Benito, S. M. (2018). A new educational pattern in response to new technologies and sustainable development. Enlightening ICT skills for youth employability in the European Union. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1031–1038.
  • Porter, G. (2012). Mobile phones, livelihoods and the poor in Sub-Saharan Africa: Review and prospect. Geography Compass, 6(5), 241–259.
  • Porter, G. (2015). Mobile phones, mobility practices, and transport organization in Sub-Saharan Africa. Mobility in History, 6(1), 81–88.
  • Potnis, D. D. (2015). Beyond access to information: Understanding the use of information by poor female mobile users in rural India. The Information Society, 31(1), 83–93.
  • Quarry, W., & Ramírez, R. (2009). Communication for another development: Listening before telling. London: Zed.
  • Qureshi, S. (2015). Are we making a better world with information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) research? Findings from the field and theory building. Information Technology for Development, 21(4), 511–522.
  • Qureshi, S. (2017). The forgotten awaken: ICT’s evolving role in the roots of mass discontent. Information Technology for Development, 23(1), 1–17.
  • Ramadani, L., Kurnia, S., & Breidbach, C. F. (2018). In search for holistic ICT4D research: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 3–6, 2018 (pp. 2424–2433). Waikoloa Village, HI.
  • Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, freedom and social justice: The capability approach re-examined. Cambridge, UK: Open Book.
  • Röller, L.-H., & Waverman, L. (2001). Telecommunications infrastructure and economic development: A simultaneous approach. American Economic Review, 91(4), 909–923.
  • Sachs, J. (2008). Internet and mobile phones spur economic development. Retrieved from http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2008/08/internet_and_mobile_phones_spu.html
  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sam, S. (2017). Towards an empowerment framework for evaluating mobile phone use and impact in developing countries. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 359–369.
  • Samuel, J., Shah, N., & Hadingham, W. (2005). Mobile communications in South Africa, Tanzania, and Egypt. Africa: The impact of mobile phones. The Vodafone Policy Paper Series No 3, pp. 44–52.
  • Sarkar, S. (2018). Aspirations and contestations: ICT training and subjectivities among marginalized youth. Information Technologies & International Development, 14, 151–163.
  • Saumure, K., & Given, L. M. (2008). Data saturation. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 1&2, pp. 195–196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Savolainen, R. (1995). Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of “Way of life”. Library and Information Science Research, 17(3), 259–294.
  • Savolainen, R. (2008). Everyday information practices: A social phenomenological perspective. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
  • Savolainen, R. (2010). Everyday information seeking. In M. J. Bates & M. N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (3rd ed., vol. 3, pp. 1780–1789). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Sein, M. K., Thapa, D., Hatakka, M., & Sæbø, Ø. (2019). A holistic perspective on the theoretical foundations for ICT4D research. Information Technology for Development, 25(1), 7–25.
  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Random House.
  • Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Sen, A. K. (2012). Values and justice. Journal of Economic Methodology, 19(2), 101–108.
  • Shera, J. H. (1970). Sociological foundations of librarianship. Bombay: Asian Publishing House.
  • Shera, J. H. (1971). The sociological relationships of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 22(2), 76–80.
  • Silvey, R., & Rankin, K. (2011). Development geography: Critical development studies and political geographic imaginaries. Progress in Human Geography, 35(5), 696–704.
  • Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen derVergesellschaftung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
  • Smith, M. L., Spence, R., & Rashid, A. T. (2011). Mobile phones and expanding human capabilities. Information Technologies and International Development, 7(3), 77–88.
  • Spence, R. (2009). Economic growth. In S. Deneulin & L. Shahani (Eds.), An introduction to the human development and capability approach: Freedom and agency (pp. 73–100). London: Earthscan.
  • Spry, T. (2016). Autoethnography and the other: Unsettling power through utopian performatives. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Starasts, A. (2015). ‘Unearthing farmers’ information seeking contexts and challenges in digital, local and industry environments’. Library & Information Science Research, 37(2), 156–163.
  • Steinfield, C., Wyche, S., Cai, T., & Chiwasa, H. (2015). The mobile divide revisited: Mobile phone use by smallholder farmers in Malawi. ICTD ‘15 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Singapore, 15–18 May 2015.
  • Tan, E. M.-Y., & Goh, D. H.-L. (2015). A study of social interaction during mobile information seeking. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2031–2044.
  • Tanabe, M., van den Besselaar, P., & Ishida, T. (2002). Introduction: Digital cities research and open issues. In M. Tanabe, P. van den Besselaar, & T. Ishida (Eds.), Digital cities II: Computational and sociological approaches (pp. 1–9). New York, NY: Springer.
  • The Millennium Development Goals. (2000). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/millennium_summit.shtml
  • Todaro, M. P. (1997). Economic development (6th ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley.
  • Toyama, K. (2015). Geek heresy: Rescuing social change from the cult of technology. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
  • Toyama, K. (2018). From needs to aspirations in information technology for development. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 15–36.
  • Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “Big-Tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851.
  • Tracy, S. J. (2012). The toxic and mythical combination of a deductive writing logic for inductive qualitative research. Qualitative Communication Research, 1(1), 109–141.
  • Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, and communicating impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Unwin, T. (2009). Development agendas and the place of ICTs. In T. Unwin (Ed.), ICT4D: Information and communication technology for development (pp. 7–38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Unwin, T. (2017). Reclaiming information & communication technology for development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Walsham, G. (1995a). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81.
  • Walsham, G. (1995b). The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research, 6(4), 376–394.
  • Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330.
  • Walsham, G. (2012). Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2), 87–93.
  • Walsham, G. (2013). Development informatics in a changing world: Reflections from ICTD 2010/2012. Information Technologies and International Development, 9(1), 49–54.
  • Walsham, G. (2014). Empiricism in interpretive IS research: A response to Stahl. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(1), 12–16.
  • Walsham, G. (2017). ICT4D research: Reflections on history and future agenda. Information Technology for Development, 23(1), 18–41.
  • Weber, M. (1921/2002). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundniβ der verstehende Soziologie (fünfte, revidierte Auflage besorgt von Johannes Winckelmann). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  • Webster, A. (1997). Introduction to the sociology of development (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wilson, E. J., III, Best, M. L., & Kleine, D. (2005). Moving beyond “The Real Digital Divide”. Information Technologies and International Development, 2(3), iii–v.
  • World Bank. (2003). Lifelong learning in the global knowledge economy: Challenges for developing countries. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • World Bank. (2013). The World Bank goals: End extreme poverty and promote shared prosperity. Washington, DC: Author.
  • World Bank. (2015). Annual report 2015. Washington, DC: Author.
  • World Bank. (2016a). Annual report 2016. Washington, DC: Author.
  • World Bank. (2016b). Digital dividends. Washington, DC: Author.
  • World Bank. (2017). Annual Report 2017: End extreme poverty, boost shared prosperity. Washington, DC: Author.
  • World Bank. (2018). Learning to realize education’s promise. Washington, DC: Author.
  • World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). (2003). Declaration of principles. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/net/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html
  • WSIS. (2005). Tunis commitment. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/docs2/tunis/off/7.html
  • Wyche, S., & Olson, J. (2018). Kenyan women's rural realities, mobile internet access, and “Africa Rising”. Information Technologies & International Development (Special Section), 14, 33–47.
  • Wyche, S., & Steinfield, C. (2016). Why don’t farmers use cell phones to access market prices? Technology affordances and barriers to market information services adoption in rural Kenya. Information Technology for Development, 22(2), 320–333.
  • Xiong, J., & Qureshi, S. (2013, January 7–10). A model of ICTs adoption for sustainable development: An investigation of small business in the United States and China. 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2013). Wailea, Maui, HI.
  • Yan, Z. (2015). Preface. In Z. Yan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mobile phone behavior (pp. xxxix–xliii). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Zheng, Y., Hatakka, M., Sahay, S., & Andersson, A. (2018). Conceptualizing development in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 1–14.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.