References
- Abdelnour-Nocera, J., & Densmore, M. (2017). A review of perspectives and challenges for international development in information and communication technologies. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1392252
- Abdelnour-Nocera, J., & Rangaswamy, N. (2018). Reflecting on the design-culture connection in HCI and HCI4D. Interactions, 25, 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264381
- Avgerou, C. (2008). Information systems in developing countries: A critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23, 133–146.
- Avgerou, C. (2017). Theoretical framing of ICT4D research. In IFIP advances in information and communication technology ( Vol. 504, pp. 10–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_2
- Bai, Y. (2018). Has the global south become a playground for western scholars in information and communication technologies. Scientometrics, 116, 2139–2153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2839-y
- Bailey, A., & Osei-Bryson, K.-M. (2018). Contextual reflections on innovations in an interconnected world: Theoretical lenses and practical considerations in ICT4D. Information Technology for Development, 1102, 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1499202
- Best, M. L. M. (2010). Understanding our knowledge gaps: Or, do we have an ICT4D field? And do we want one? Information Technologies & International Development, 6, 49–52. http://itidjournal.org/index.php/itid/article/download/622/262
- Bødker, S. (2015). Third-wave HCI, 10 years later -participation and sharing. Interactions, 22, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804405
- Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews. In Formulating research methods for information systems ( Vol. 2, pp. 48–78). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509888_3
- Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106, 531–541. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.283
- Burrell, J., & Toyama, K. (2009). What constitutes good ICTD research? Information Technologies and International Development, 5, 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1110-1198
- Cavacini, A. (2015). What is the best database for computer science journal articles? Scientometrics, 102, 2059–2071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1506-1
- Chetty, M., & Grinter, R. E. (2007). HCI4D: HCI challenges in the global south. CHI ‘07 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (CHI EA ‘07) (pp. 2327–2332). Association for Computing Machinery.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
- Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
- Crilly, T., Jashapara, A., & Ferlie, E. (2010). Knowledge mobilisation: A scoping review of the literature report for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and organisation programme – SDO project (08/1801/220) research.
- Dell, N., & Kumar, N. (2016). The ins and outs of HCI for development. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems – CHI ‘16 (pp. 2220–2232). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858081
- Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4, 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691
- Flor, A. G. (2018). Knowledge management for development (KM4D). In Encyclopedia of information science and technology (pp. 5077–5084). IGI Global.
- Gasparyan, A. Y., Yessirkepov, M., Voronov, A. A., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., Gerasimov, A. N., & Kitas, G. D. (2016). Specialist bibliographic databases. Korean Academy of Medical Sciences, 31, 660–673. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660
- Gitau, S., Plantinga, P., & Diga, K. (2010). ICTD research by Africans: Origins, interests and impact. Fourth international conference on information and communication technologies and development (ICTD 2010), London, 12–16 December 2010.
- Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
- Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 30, 611–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742
- Heeks, R. (2018). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652603
- Heeks, R., & Wall, P. J. (2018). Critical realism and ICT4D research. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(6), Article e12051. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12051
- Hering, J. G. (2016). Do we need ‘more research’ or better implementation through knowledge brokering ? Sustainability Science, 11, 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0314-8
- Hevner, A. R. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 4.
- Ho, M. R., Smyth, T. N., Kam, M., & Dearden, A. (2009). Human-computer Interaction for development: The past, present, and future. Information Technologies & International Development, 5, 1–18.
- Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., & Grinter, R. E. (2010). Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems – CHI ‘10 (p. 1311). https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753522
- Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
- Jonker, J. W. (2016). A comparative analysis of development theories in ICTD research from developed and developing countries. Master of Arts (Socio-Informatics), Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Stellenbosch University. http://ir.nrf.ac.za/handle/10907/910
- Kelly, P. R. (2018). An activity theory study of data, knowledge, and power in the design of an international development NGO impact evaluation. Information Systems Journal, 28, 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12187
- Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
- Kleine, D. (2009). ICT4 what? Using the choice framework to operationalise the capability approach to development. 2009 international conference on information and communication technologies and development (ICTD) (pp. 108–117). IEEE.
- Kou, Y., Gray, C. M., & Nardi, B. (2018). The politics of titling: The representation of countries in CHI papers. The Politics of titling: The representation of countries in CHI papers. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188409
- Levin, B. (2011). Mobilising research knowledge in education. London Review of Education, 9, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2011.550431
- Loudon, M., & Rivett, U. (2013). Enacting openness in ICT4D research. In Open development: Networked innovations in international development (pp. 53–78). MIT Press.
- Malin, J. R., & Paralkar, V. K. (2017). Educational knowledge brokerage and mobilization: The Marshall memo case. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2017v12n7a790
- Mingers, J. (2004). Realizing information systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14(2), 87–103.
- Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). Working papers on information systems a guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Working Papers on Information Systems, 10. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824
- Omland, H. O., & Thapa, D. (2017). Methodological approach for identifying mechanisms in ICT4D: A critical realism perspective. IFIP AICT, 504, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7
- Oulasvirta, A., & Hornbæk, K. (2016, May 7–12). HCI research as problem – solving. CHI’16 (pp. 4956–4967). ACM.
- Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information and Management, 52, 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
- Pfeiffer, D., & Niehaves, B. (2005). Evaluation of conceptual models – a structuralist approach. Proceedings of the 13th European conference on information systems, information systems in a rapidly changing economy, ECIS 2005 (pp. 43). http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2005/43
- Phipps, D. J., & Shapson, S. (2009). Knowledge mobilisation builds local research collaborations for social innovation. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 5(3), 211–227.
- Pretto, G., & Curró, G. (2017). An approach for doctoral students conducting context-specific review of literature in IT, ICT, and educational technology. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23, 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2016.1227861
- Qureshi, S. (2015). Are we making a better world with information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) research? Findings from the field and theory building. Information Technology for Development, 21, 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1080428
- Qureshi, S., & Xiong, J. J. (2017). Understanding the role of information technology in the development of micro-enterprises: Concepts to study in making a better world. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 2627–2636). University of Nebraska Omaha.
- Reeves, S. (2015). Locating the ‘big hole’ in HCI research. Interactions, 22, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/2785986
- Renken, J., & Heeks, R. (2018). Social network analysis and ICT4D research: Principles, relevance, and practice. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC), 84(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12036
- Rogers, Y. (2012). HCI theory: Classical, modern and contemporary. Synthesis Lectures on Human- Centered Informatics, 5, 1–120.
- Salerno, C., Ouma, S., & Botha, A. (2015). Developing a conceptual model for facilitating the issuing of digital badges in a resource constrained environment. Proceedings of the 2015 annual research conference on South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists – SAICSIT ‘15 (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1145/2815782.2815822.
- Sein, M. K., Thapa, D., Hatakka, M., & Sæbø, Ø. (2019). A holistic perspective on the theoretical foundations for ICT4D research. Information Technology for Development, 25(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1503589
- SWARM. (2019). Sematic web and research methodology wiki. http://eagle.unisa.ac.za/mediawiki/index.php/Semantic_Web_and_Research_Methodology
- Toyama, K. (2010). Human–computer interaction and global development. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction, 4, 1–79. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000021
- Toyama, K. (2018). From needs to aspirations in information technology for development. Information Technology for Development, 24, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1310713
- Van Biljon, J., & Alexander, T. (2015). A conceptual framework for ICT4D. In J. Steyn & D. van Greunen (Eds.), ICTs for inclusive communities in developing societies (pp. 84–106). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Van Biljon, J., & Renaud, K. (2016). Validating mobile phone design guidelines: Focusing on the elderly in a developing country. Proceedings of the annual conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (pp. 1–10). ACM.
- Van Biljon, J., & Renaud, K. (2018). Reflections on the maturity of the mobile communication technology for development (M4D) landscape: 2008-2016. In R. Baguma & J. S. Pettersson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on M4D mobile communication technology for development (pp. 7–18). Karlstads universitet.
- Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589
- Walsham, G. (2017). ICT4D research: Reflections on history and future agenda. Information Technology for Development, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406
- Ward, V. (2017). Why, whose, what and how? A framework for knowledge mobilisers. Evidence & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14634763278725
- Ward, V., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2009). Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: A thematic analysis of the literature. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy y, 14, 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120
- Wyche, S. P., & Murphy, L. L. (2012). “Dead China – make” Phones off the grid: Investigating and designing for mobile phone use in rural Africa. Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (pp. 186–195). https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317985
- Zewge, A., Dittrich, Y., & Bekele, R. (2015). Adapting participatory design to design information system with rural Ethiopian community. AFRICON, 2015 (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
- Zheng, Y., Hatakka, M., Sahay, S., & Andersson, A. (2018). Conceptualizing development in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Information Technology for Development, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1396020