The potential of eParticipation in enlarging individual capabilities: a conceptual framework

References

• Aladwani, A. M. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison of Kuwaiti and British citizens’ views of e-government interface quality. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alathur, S., Ilavarasan, P. V., & Gupta, M. P. (2012). Citizen participation and effectiveness of e-petition: Sutharyakeralam – India. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(4), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161211267536
   Google Scholar
• Alathur, S., Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P., & Gupta, M. P. (2016). Determinants of e-participation in the citizens and the government initiatives: Insights from India. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 55, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2016.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2015). Understanding e-government research: A perspective from the information and library science field of knowledge. Internet Research, 25(4), 633–673. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2013-0259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, H., & Ali, T. (2014). International conference on information society (pp. 146–150). i-Society.
   Google Scholar
• Aljarrah, E., Elrehail, H., & Aababneh, B. (2016). E-voting in Jordan: Assessing readiness and developing a system. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 860–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, B., Tamindael, L. E., Bickerton, S. H., & Cho, W. (2020). Does citizen coproduction lead to better urban services in smart cities projects? An empirical study on e-participation in a mobile big data platform. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alomari, M. K. (2016). E-voting adoption in a developing country. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(4), 526–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2015-0046
   Google Scholar
• Amalia, D. N., & Susanto, T. D. (2019). Analysis of motivation and perceived risk factors in open data measurement: A conceptual model. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.128
   Google Scholar
• Androutsopoulou, A., Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. (2019). Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avgerou, C. (2008). Information systems in developing countries: A critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avgerou, C. (2013). Explaining trust in IT-mediated elections: A case study of e-voting in Brazil. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(8), 420–451. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). Forward to the past: Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far. Information Polity, 17(3–4), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-000282
   Google Scholar
• Bataineh, L., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2016). How perceptions of E-participation levels influence the intention to use E-government websites. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0058
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, D. J. (2017). E-Governance and e-participation via online citizen budgets and electronic lobbying: Promises and challenges. World Affairs, 180(4), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820018771137
   Google Scholar
• Berix, M. (2012). YUTPA as a design tool for public participation. AI and Society, 27(1), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-011-0329-3
   Google Scholar
• Bershadskaya, L., Chugunov, A., & Trutnev, D. (2011). IT awareness of senior level civil servants and its influence on the results of e-Gov projects in Russia. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 244–248. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072108.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, I., & MacKenzie, A. (2019). Just Google it! Digital literacy and the epistemology of ignorance. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1547276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckland, R., & Wen, R. (2012). The future of e-voting in Australia. IEEE Security and Privacy, 10(5), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2012.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, M., & Hickman, R. (2019). Understanding travel and differential capabilities and functionings in Beijing. Transport Policy, 83(July), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caric, A., Vukovic, M., & Jevtic, D. (2015). E-consultation: Automatic system for online consultations. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Telecommunications, ConTEL 2015, April. https://doi.org/10.1109/ConTEL.2015.7231215.
   Google Scholar
• Carrara, S. (2012). Towards e-ECIs? European participation by online pan-European mobilization. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13(3), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2012.702578
   Google Scholar
• Charalabidis, Y., & Loukis, E. (2011). Transforming government agencies’ approach to eParticipation through efficient exploitation of social media. In 19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, M., Habib, A., Evangelopoulos, N., & Park, H. W. (2018). Dynamic capabilities of a smart city: An innovative approach to discovering urban problems and solutions. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 682–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, S. A., & Cho, J. S. (2012). E-participation and transparent policy decision making. Information Polity, 17(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0273
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S., Lomax, N., & Morris, M. A. (2017). Classification of Westminster Parliamentary constituencies using e-petition data. EPJ Data Science, 6(1), https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0113-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cledou, M. G., Fernandes, S., & Estevez, E. (2013). WeLEaD: Collaborative toolkit for learning, engaging and deciding. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 378–379. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591888.2591968.
   Google Scholar
• Dolson, J., & Young, R. (2012). Explaining variation in the e-government features of municipal websites: An analysis of e-content, e-participation, and social media features in Canadian municipal websites. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 21(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Edelmann, N. (2017). Lurking in online participation and e-participation. In 4th International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2017, 282–284. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2017.7962552.
   Google Scholar
• Edelmann, N., Krimmer, R., & Parycek, P. (2017). How online lurking contributes value to E-participation: A conceptual approach to evaluating the role of lurkers in e-participation. In 4th International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2017, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2017.7962517.
   Google Scholar
• Ergazakis, E., Ergazakis, K., Askounis, D., & Charalabidis, Y. (2011). Digital cities: Towards an integrated decision support methodology. Telematics and Informatics, 28(3), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedotova, O., Teixeira, L., & Alvelos, H. (2012). E-participation in Portugal: Evaluation of government electronic platforms. Procedia Technology, 5, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.017
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., Jonathan Ye, H., Yu, Y., Yang, C., & Cui, T. (2018). Gamification artifacts and crowdsourcing participation: Examining the mediating role of intrinsic motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., Gauld, R., & Herbison, P. (2009). The participation divide? Political participation, trust in government, and E-government in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00643.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalves, J., Hosio, S., Rogstadius, J., Karapanos, E., & Kostakos, V. (2015). Motivating participation and improving quality of contribution in ubiquitous crowdsourcing. Computer Networks, 90, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., & Lopez, R. A. (2019). The practice of civic tech: Tensions in the adoption and use of new technologies in community based organizations. Media and Communication, 7(3 Civic Organizations in an Age of Distrust), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.2180.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, G. J., Williams, C. B., & Yates, D. J. (2014). Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: A cross-national comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, L., Harrison, T. M., Uzuner, Ö, May, W., Fake, T., & Katragadda, S. (2016). E-petition popularity: Do linguistic and semantic factors matter? Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 783–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanel, K., & Marschall, S. (2013). The usage of online collaboration platforms by parties: Strengthening the “party on the ground” or the “party in central office”?. German Politics and Society, 31(3), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2013.310302
   Google Scholar
• Hasim, W., Wibirama, S., & Nugroho, H. A. (2019). Redesign of E-participation using user-centered design approach for improving user experience. In 2019 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology, ICOIACT 2019, 857–861. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIACT46704.2019.8938545.
   Google Scholar
• Hatakka, M., & Lagsten, J. (2012). The capability approach as a tool for development evaluation – analyzing students’ use of internet resources. Information Technology for Development, 18(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2011.617722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatakka, M., Thapa, D., & Sæbø, Ø. (2020). Understanding the role of ICT and study circles in enabling economic opportunities: Lessons learned from an educational project in Kenya. Information Systems Journal, 30(4), 664–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, G., Boas, I., Mol, A. P. J., & Lu, Y. (2017). E-participation for environmental sustainability in transitional urban China. Sustainability Science, 12(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0403-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbig, N., Gil-García, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, B. D. (2017). E-participation in the Philippines: A capabilities approach to socially inclusive governance. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 9(2), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v9i2.461
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, H. (2019). Barriers and Drivers of using social media in e-governance: A global case study. In 19th IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology, ISSPIT 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPIT47144.2019.9001764.
   Google Scholar
• Ingrams, A., & Schachter, H. L. (2019). E-participation opportunities and the ambiguous role of corruption: A model of municipal responsiveness to sociopolitical factors. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 601–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., & Helbig, N. (2018). Innovating and Changing the Policy-Cycle: Policy-Makers be Prepared! Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S99–S105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelokhani-Niaraki, M., Hajiloo, F., & Samany, N. N. (2019). A web-based public participation GIS for assessing the age-friendliness of cities: A case study in Tehran, Iran. Cities, 95(August), 102471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johri, A., & Pal, J. (2012). Capable and convivial design (CCD): A framework for designing information and communication technologies for human development. Information Technology for Development, 18(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2011.643202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juell-Skielse, G., Lönn, C. M., & Päivärinta, T. (2017). Modes of collaboration and expected benefits of inter-organizational E-government initiatives: A multi-case study. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juiz, C., Guerrero, C., & Lera, I. (2014). Implementing good governance principles for the public sector in information technology governance frameworks. Open Journal of Accounting, 03(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojacct.2014.31003
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., & Jürgens, P. (2011). The political click: Political participation through E-petitions in Germany. Policy & Internet, 2(4), 127–161. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1084
   Google Scholar
• Jurgens, M., & Helsloot, I. (2018). The effect of social media on the dynamics of (self) resilience during disasters: A literature review. Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26, 79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamoun, F., & Basel Almourad, M. (2014). Accessibility as an integral factor in e-government web site evaluation: The case of dubai e-government. Information Technology and People, 27(2), 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2013-0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, F., Holgersson, J., Söderström, E., & Hedström, K. (2012). Exploring user participation approaches in public e-service development. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaun, A., & Uldam, J. (2018). Digital activism: After the hype. New Media and Society, 20(6), 2099–2106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipenis, L., & Askounis, D. (2016). Assessing e-Participation via user’s satisfaction measurement: The case of OurSpace platform. Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1911-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, D. (2013). Technologies of choice? ICTs, development, and the capabilities approach. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleine, D., Light, A., & Montero, M. J. (2012). Signifiers of the life we value? – considering human development, technologies and fair trade from the perspective of the capabilities approach. Information Technology for Development, 18(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2011.643208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, D., & Unwin, T. (2009). Technological revolution, evolution and new dependencies: What’s new about ict4d? Third World Quarterly, 30(5), 1045–1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590902959339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N., & Gaskins, L. (2014). The mediating role of voice and accountability in the relationship between Internet diffusion and government corruption in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa. Information Technology for Development, 20(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2013.832129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, S., Teo, T. S. H., & Lymm, J. (2017). Determinants of electronic participation and electronic government maturity: Insights from cross-country data. International Journal of Information Management, 37(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2014). Active citizen e-participation in local governance: Do individual social capital and e-participation management matter? In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2044–2053. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.259.
   Google Scholar
• Leith, P. (2012). E-participation and e-participants: Solving the patent “crisis”. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 26(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2012.646783
   Google Scholar
• Lidén, G. (2016). Inequality in local digital politics: How different preconditions for citizen engagement can be explained. Policy &Internet, 8(3), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Literat, I., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Brough, M., & Blum-Ross, A. (2018). Analyzing youth digital participation: Aims, actors, contexts and intensities. Information Society, 34(4), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1463333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2017). Opportunities and challenges for digital governance in a world of digital participation. Information Polity, 22(2–3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, C., Hoffmann, C. P., & Meckel, M. (2014). Beyond just politics: A systematic literature review of online participation. First Monday, 19(7), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i7.5260
   Google Scholar
• Machintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing E-participation in policy-making. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37), January 5–8, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mandarano, L. A., & Meenar, M. (2015). e-Participation: Comparing trends in practice and the classroom. Planning Practice and Research, 30(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1017933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, N. O. (2018). The classical circular economy, sraffian ecological economics and the capabilities approach. Ecological Economics, 145, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateu, V., Sebé, F., & Valls, M. (2014). Constructing credential-based E-voting systems from offline E-coin protocols. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 42, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2014.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medaglia, R. (2012). Eparticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momeni, M. (2017). Social media and political participation. New Media & Society, 19(12), 2094–2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817728054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., & Casteleyn, S. (2018). E-participation adoption models research in the last 17 years: A weight and meta-analytical review. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., & Casteleyn, S. (2019a). Citizens’ intention to use and recommend e-participation: Drawing upon UTAUT and citizen empowerment. Information Technology and People, 32(2), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2017-0257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., Casteleyn, S., & Irani, Z. (2019b). Continuous usage of e-participation: The role of the sense of virtual community. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento, D. M. (2016). Information flows in e-participation applications. In International Conference on Information Society, 2, 51–52.
   Google Scholar
• Neirotti, P., & Raguseo, E. (2017). On the contingent value of IT-based capabilities for the competitive advantage of SMEs: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. Information and Management, 54(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolova, M. (2015). Perspectives for ICT applications in e-democracy. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochara, N. M., & Mawela, T. (2015). Enabling social sustainability of E-participation through mobile technology. Information Technology for Development, 21(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2013.833888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öktem, M. K., Demİrhan, K., & Demİrhan, H. (2014). The usage of E-governance applications by higher education students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(5), 1925–1943. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.5.2051
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, C., & Garcia, A. C. B. (2019). Citizens’ electronic participation: A systematic review of their challenges and how to overcome them. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 15(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2019.10020619
   Google Scholar
• Oser, J., Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). Is online participation distinct from offline participation? A latent class analysis of participation types and their stratification. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912436695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulos, P., Elliman, T., & Fitzgerald, G. (2011). How can public sector ICT transformation be institutionally-enabled? A UK local government study. In 19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2018). An eParticipation acceptance model. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 9(1), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2018.2861426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information and Management, 52(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parycek, P., Höchtl, J., & Ginner, M. (2014). Open government data implementation evaluation. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 9(2), 13–14. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parycek, P., Schollhammer, R., & Schossbock, J. (2015). Emotions and E-participation of young people: A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2015-March, 2415–2424. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.289.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, K. (2011). A general and efficient countermeasure to relation attacks in mix-based e-voting. International Journal of Information Security, 10(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-010-0122-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflughoeft, B. R., & Schneider, I. E. (2020). Social media as E-participation: Can a multiple hierarchy stratification perspective predict public interest? Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirannejad, A., Janssen, M., & Rezaei, J. (2019). Towards a balanced E-Participation Index: Integrating government and society perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porwol, L., Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2013). On the duality of E-participation – Towards a Foundation for Citizen-Led Participation. In A. Kő, C. Leitner, H. Leitold, & A. Prosser (Eds.), Technology-Enabled Innovation for Democracy, Government and Governance. EGOVIS/EDEM 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8061 (pp. 211–225). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40160-2_17.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzebon, M., Cunha, M. A., & Coelho, T. R. (2016). Making sense to decreasing citizen eParticipation through a social representation lens. Information and Organization, 26(3), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2016.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S. (2011). Information technology for development in expanding capabilities. Information Technology for Development, 17(2), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2011.569355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S. (2015). Are we making a better world with information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) research? Findings from the field and theory building. Information Technology for Development, 21(4), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1080428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathore, H., Jakhar, S. K., Bhattacharya, A., & Madhumitha, E. (2020). Examining the mediating role of innovative capabilities in the interplay between lean processes and sustainable performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.04.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddick, C., & Norris, D. F. (2013). E-participation in local governments: An examination of political-managerial support and impacts. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(4), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2013-0008
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J., & Sanford, C. (2016). Designing the e-Participation artifact designing the e-participation artefact. March.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2004). Evaluating public participation exercises: A research agenda. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(4), 512–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumbul, R. (2016). Tools for transparency’ Institutional barriers to effective civic technology in Latin America. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2016, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.29.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Nielsen, E., & Lee, D. (2013). eParticipation in practice in Europe: the case of ‘puzzled by policy: helping you be part of EU’, In 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Wailea, Maui, HI USA, pp.1870–1879.
   Google Scholar
• Saraguro-Bravo, R., Puente-Castro, S., Quimba-Herrera, S., Costa-Campuzano, J., & Desiderio-Sanchez, K. (2017). Digital Literacy proposal to improve eParticipation in urban marginal areas. In 4th International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2017, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2017.7962548.
   Google Scholar
• Sæbø, Ø, Rose, J., & Molka-Danielsen, J. (2010). Eparticipation: Designing and managing political discussion forums. Social Science Computer Review, 28(4), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439309341626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sæbø, Ø, Rose, J., & Skiftenes Flak, L. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, S., & Wimmer, M. A. (2012). E-participation and enterprise architecture frameworks: An analysis. Information Polity, 17(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0270
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, S., & Wimmer, M. A. (2014). Conceptualising trust in E-participation contexts. In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, & F. Bannister (Eds.), Electronic participation. ePart 2014. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 8654 (pp. 64–77). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44914-1_6.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, S., Wimmer, M. A., & Strykowski, S. (2015). Social government: A concept supporting communities in co-creation and co-production of public services. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 27–30-May, 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757401.2757417.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, D., & Newig, J. (2015). Assessing online consultation in participatory governance: Conceptual framework and a case study of a national sustainability-related consultation platform in Germany. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sein, M. K., Thapa, D., Hatakka, M., & Sæbø, Ø. (2019). A holistic perspective on the theoretical foundations for ICT4D research. Information Technology for Development, 25(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1503589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The dewey lectures. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1989). Development as capability expansion. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serdult, U., Mendez, F., Harris, M., & Seo, H. S. (2016). Scaling up democracies with e-collecting? In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2016, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.13
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Conduit, J., & Rao Hill, S. (2014). Organisational capabilities for customer participation in health care service innovation. Australasian Marketing Journal, 22(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2014.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Snoeck, M., Crompvoets, J., Habra, N., Simonofski, A., & Vanderose, B. (2017). Reexamining e-participation: Systematic literature review on citizen participation in e-government service delivery. In America’s Conference on Information Systems: A Tradition of Innovation, AMCIS 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Spiliotopoulou, L., Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E. N., & Diamantopoulou, V. (2014). A framework for advanced social media exploitation in government for crowdsourcing. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(4), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2014-0002
   Google Scholar
• Steinbach, M., & Süß, S. (2018). Administrators’ identities and strategies in the e-participation innovation process: A qualitative analysis of institutional logics and institutional work in German municipalities. Information Polity, 23(3), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susha, I., & Grönlund, Å. (2014). Context clues for the stall of the citizens’ initiative: Lessons for opening up e-participation development practice. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svidroňová, M. M., Kaščáková, A., & Vrbičanová, V. (2018). Can Social Media be a Tool for Participatory Governance in Slovak Municipalities ?. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 11(2), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa, D., Sein, M. K., & Sæbø, Ø. (2012). Building collective capabilities through ICT in a mountain region of Nepal: Where social capital leads to collective action. Information Technology for Development, 18(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2011.643205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, S. K., Reisinger, M., Röderer, K., & Fröhlich, P. (2016). Playing (with) democracy: A review of gamified participation approaches. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 8(3), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v8i3.440
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., & Narayan, P. (2014). The role of participatory communication in tracking unreported reproductive tract issues in marginalized communities. Information Technology for Development, 22(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2014.886549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomor, Z., Meijer, A., Michels, A., & Geertman, S. (2019). Smart governance for sustainable cities: Findings from a systematic literature review. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(4), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unt, T., Solvak, M., & Vassil, K. (2017). Does internet voting make elections less social? Group voting patterns in Estonian e-voting log files (2013–2015). PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0177864. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viale Pereira, G., Cunha, M. A., Lampoltshammer, T. J., Parycek, P., & Testa, M. G. (2017). Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: A cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Information Technology for Development, 23(3), 526–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viale Pereira, G., Estevez, E., Cardona, D., Chesñevar, C., Collazzo-Yelpo, P., Cunha, M. A., Diniz, E. H., Ferraresi, A. A., Fischer, F. M., Cardinelle Oliveira Garcia, F., Joia, L. A., Luciano, E. M., de Albuquerque, J. P., Quandt, C. O., Sánchez Rios, R., Sánchez, A., Damião da Silva, E., Silva-Junior, J. S., & Scholz, R. W. (2020). South American expert roundtable: Increasing adaptive governance capacity for coping with unintended side effects of digital transformation. Sustainability, 12(2), 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, M. R., & Novo, A. (2014). An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens’ online engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Liu, Z. (2019). Online engagement in social media: A cross-cultural comparison. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Watson, T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://doi.org/10.2307/249576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamora Medina, R., & Muñoz, C. (2014). Campaigning on Twitter: Towards the ‘Personal Style’ Campaign to Activate the Political Engagement During the 2011 Spanish General Elections (Vol. 27, pp. 83–106). Communication and Society / Comunicación y Sociedad.
   Google Scholar
• Zepic, R., Dapp, M., & Krcmar, H. (2017). Participatory budgeting without participants: Identifying barriers on accessibility and usage of German participatory budgeting. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2017, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.24.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, F. (2013). An empirical study of cultural dimensions and e-government development: Implications of the findings and strategies. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32(3), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.644580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. (2009). Different spaces for e-development: What can we learn from the capability approach? Information Technology for Development, 15(2), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. (2017). Explaining citizens’ E-participation usage: Functionality of E-participation applications. Administration and Society, 49(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715593313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zissis, D., & Lekkas, D. (2011). Securing e-Government and e-Voting with an open cloud computing architecture. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar