177
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Centering queer knowledge paradigms in designing and implementing health information and communication technologies

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Objects, orientations, others. Duke University Press.
  • American Public Health Association. (2009). Support for community health workers to increase health access and to reduce health inequities. https://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2014/07/09/14/19/support-for-community-health-workers-to-increase-health-access-and-to-reduce-health-inequities
  • Anaissie, T., Cary, V., Clifford, D., Malarkey, T., & Wise, S. (2016). Liberatory design: Your toolkit to design for equity. Version, 1, K12.
  • Bain, A. L., & Payne, W. J. (2016). Queer de-participation: Reframing the co-production of scholarly knowledge. Qualitative Research, 16(3), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115619002
  • Barredo-Arrieta, A., & Del Ser, J. (2020, July 19-24). Plausible counterfactuals: Auditing deep learning classifiers with realistic adversarial examples. In 2020 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
  • Brewster, K., & Ruberg, B. (2020). SURVIVORS: Archiving the history of bulletin board systems and the AIDS crisis. First Monday.
  • Bronstein, C. (2020). Pornography, trans visibility, and the demise of Tumblr. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 7(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-8143407
  • Charest, M., Kleinplatz, P. J., & Lund, J. I. (2016). Sexual health information disparities between heterosexual and LGBTQ+ young adults: Implications for sexual health. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 25(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.252-A9
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
  • Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage.
  • Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press.
  • Currin, J. M., Hubach, R. D., Durham, A. R., Kavanaugh, K. E., Vineyard, Z., & Croff, J. M. (2017). How gay and bisexual men compensate for the lack of meaningful sex education in a socially conservative state. Sex Education, 17(6), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2017.1355298
  • D’Adamo, K. (2018). Queering the trade: Intersections of the sex worker and LGBTQ movements. In A. Jones, J. DeFilippis, & M. Yarbrough (Eds.), The unfinished queer agenda after marriage equality (pp. 35–52). Routledge.
  • Dame, A. (2016). Making a name for yourself: Tagging as transgender ontological practice on Tumblr. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2015.1130846
  • Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Davis, H. F. (2018). Beyond trans: Does gender matter? NYU Press.
  • DeHaan, S., Kuper, L. E., Magee, J. C., Bigelow, L., & Mustanski, B. S. (2013). The interplay between online and offline explorations of identity, relationships, and sex: A mixed-methods study with LGBT youth. Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661489
  • Delmonaco, D., Marcu, G., & Haimson, O. L. (2020). Search engines and the sex education information practices of LGBTQ+ youth. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e364. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.364
  • Evans, Y. N., Gridley, S. J., Crouch, J., Wang, A., Moreno, M. A., Ahrens, K., & Breland, D. J. (2017). Understanding online resource use by transgender youth and caregivers: A qualitative study. Transgender Health, 2(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2017.0011
  • Farber, R. (2017). Transing’fitness and remapping transgender male masculinity in online message boards. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1250618
  • Flanders, C. E., Dinh, R. N., Pragg, L., Dobinson, C., & Logie, C. H. (2021). Young sexual minority women’s evaluation processes of online and digital sexual health information. Health Communication, 36(10), 1286–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1751381
  • Flanders, C. E., Pragg, L., Dobinson, C., & Logie, C. (2017). Young sexual minority women's use of the internet and other digital technologies for sexual health information seeking. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 26(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.261-A2
  • Floegel, D. (2020). “Write the story you want to read”: World-queering through slash fanfiction creation. Journal of Documentation, 785–805. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2019-0217
  • Gahagan, J., & Colpitts, E. (2017). Understanding and measuring LGBTQ pathways to health: A scoping review of strengths-based health promotion approaches in LGBTQ health research. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1172893
  • Gill-Peterson, J. (2018). Histories of the transgender child. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Giroux, H. A. (2016). Public intellectuals against the neoliberal university. In N. K. Denzlin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry outside the academy (pp. 35–60). Routledge.
  • Gray, M. L. (2009). Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visiblity in rural America. New York University Press.
  • Greyson, D., O'Brien, H., & Shoveller, J. (2017). Information world mapping: A participatory arts-based elicitation method for information behavior interviews. Library & Information Science Research, 39(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.003
  • Haimson, O. L., Dame-Griff, A., Capello, E., & Richter, Z. (2021a). Tumblr was a trans technology: The meaning, importance, history, and future of trans technologies. Feminist Media Studies, 21(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1678505
  • Haimson, O. L., Delmonaco, D., Nie, P., & Wegner, A. (2021b). Disproportionate removals and differing content moderation experiences for conservative, transgender, and black social media users: Marginalization and moderation gray areas. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–35. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3479610
  • Haimson, O. L., Gorrell, D., Starks, D. L., & Weinger, Z. (2020, April). Designing trans technology: Defining challenges and envisioning community-centered solutions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. April 25th-30th, 1–13.
  • Halberstam, J. (2009). In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York University Press.
  • Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Duke University Press.
  • Harless, C., Nanney, M., Johnson, A. H., Polaski, A., & Beach-Ferrara, J. (2020). The report of the 2019 Southern LGBTQ health survey. https://doi.org/10.1145/1834518.1834525
  • Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Pachankis, J. E. (2016). Stigma and minority stress as social determinants of health among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: Research evidence and clinical implications. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 63(6), 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2016.07.003
  • Hawkins, B. (2017). Does quality matter? Health information behaviors of LGBTQ youth in Prince George, Canada. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 699–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401121
  • Hawkins, B., & Gieseking, J. J. (2017). Seeking ways to our transgender bodies, by ourselves: Rationalizing transgender-specific health information behaviors. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 702–704. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401122
  • Heeks, R. (2006). Theorizing ICT4D research. Information Technologies & International Development, 3(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1162/itid.2007.3.3.1
  • Hot Mess, L. M. (2015). Selfies and side-eye: Drag queens take on Facebook. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 16(2), 144–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2015.1038202
  • Huttenen, A., & Kortelainen, T. (2021). Meaning-making on gender: Deeply meaningful information in a significant life change amongst transgender people. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(7), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24447
  • Institute of Medicine. (2011). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: Building a foundation for better understanding. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13128
  • Ivy, V. (2021). If “Ifs” and “buts” were candy and nuts: The failure of arguments against trans and intersex women's full and equal inclusion in women's sport. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2021.2.10726
  • Jaeger, P. T., & Burnett, G. (2010). Information worlds: Social context, technology, and information behavior in the age of the internet (Vol. 8). Routledge.
  • James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016). The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey. National Center for Transgender Equality. https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf
  • Jia, R. M., Du, J. T., & Zhao, Y. C. (2021). Characteristics of the health information seeking behavior of LGBTQ+ individuals: A systematic review on information types, information sources and influencing factors. Journal of Documentation, 78(2), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2021-0069
  • Jourian, T. J., & Nicolazzo, Z. (2017). Bringing our communities to the research table: The liberatory potential of collaborative methodological practices alongside LGBTQ participants. Educational Action Research, 25(4), 594–609.
  • Kitzie, V., Wagner, T., & Vera, A. N. (2021). Discursive power and resistance in the information world maps of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex and asexual community leaders. Journal of Documentation, 77(3), 638–662.
  • Lee, Y. J., Kamen, C., Margolies, L., & Boehmer, U. (2019). Online health community experiences of sexual minority women with cancer. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(8–9), 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz103
  • Legal, L. (2010). When health care isn’t caring: Lambda Legal’s survey of discrimination against LGBT people and people with HIV. Lambda Legal.
  • Levinson, J. A., Greenfield, P. M., & Signorelli, J. C. (2020). A qualitative analysis of adolescent responses to YouTube videos portraying sexual and gender minority experiences: Belonging, community, and information seeking. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 2, 598886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2020.598886
  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
  • Lyonga, F. (2021). Shades of homophobia: A framework for analyzing negative attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(10), 1664–1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1702352
  • Matthews, D. D., & Lee, J. G. L. (2014). A profile of North Carolina lesbian, gay, and bisexual health disparities, 2011. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301751
  • McInroy, L. B., McCloskey, R. J., Craig, S. L., & Eaton, A. D. (2019). LGBTQ+ youths’ community engagement and resource seeking online versus offline. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 37(4), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2019.1617823
  • McIntyre, A. (2008). Participatory action research. Sage.
  • McTaggart, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848191041003003
  • National Equity Project. (2022). Introduction to Liberatory Design. https://web.archive.org/web/20220514163357/https://www.nationalequityproject.org/frameworks/liberatory-design
  • ODPHP. (2014). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health. Healthy People 2020. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender-health?topicid=25
  • Pew Research Center. (2021). Social media fact sheet. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/#who-uses-social-media
  • Ransome, Y., Zarwell, M., & Robinson, W. T. (2019). Participation in community groups increases the likelihood of PrEP awareness: New Orleans NHBS-MSM cycle, 2014. PLoS One, 14(3), e0213022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213022
  • Raun, T. (2016). Out online: Trans self-representation and community building on YouTube. Routledge.
  • Reza, A., Nedd, A., Chu, S., Castillo, A., Khan, Z., & Gardner, D. L. (2020). I like the way the skin looks: “Player perspectives on aesthetic appeal and self-representation with video game” skins. In iConference 2020 proceedings.March 23rd-26th.
  • Roberts, C., Shiman, L. J., Dowling, E. A., Tantay, L., Masdea, J., Pierre, J., Lomax, D., & Bedell, J. (2020). LGBTQ+ students of colour and their experiences and needs in sexual health education: ‘You belong here just as everybody else’. Sex Education, 20(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2019.1648248
  • Romanelli, M., & Hudson, K. D. (2017). Individual and systemic barriers to health care: Perspectives of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87(6), 714–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000306
  • Rose, I. D., & Friedman, D. B. (2016). HIV information needs of parents of young men who have sex with men. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 33(4), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12152
  • Safer, J. D., Coleman, E., Feldman, J., Garofalo, R., Hembree, W., Radix, A., & Sevelius, J. (2016). Barriers to health care for transgender individuals. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Obesity, 23(2), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000227
  • Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
  • Santos, T. C., Mann, E. S., & Pfeffer, C. A. (2021). Are university health services meeting the needs of transgender college students? A qualitative assessment of a public university. Journal of American College Health, 69(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1652181
  • Savolainen, R. (2008). Everyday information practices: A social phenomenological perspective. Scarecrow Press.
  • Savolainen, R. (2016). Approaches to socio-cultural barriers to information seeking. Library & Information Science Research, 38(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.01.007
  • SC. (2022). A.B. 4776, medical ethics and diversity act, 124th session. https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess124_2021-2022/bills/4776.htm
  • Schmitz, R. M., Tyler, K. A., & Robinson, B. A. (2019). “To get the word out”: LGBTQ+ young adults’ motivations for participating in qualitative research studies. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 31(2), 242–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2019.1567430
  • Selkie, E., Adkins, V., Masters, E., Bajpai, A., & Shumer, D. (2020). Transgender adolescents’ uses of social media for social support. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(3), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.011
  • Shaw, A., Kenski, K., Stromer-Galley, J., Mikeal Martey, R., Clegg, B. A., Lewis, J. E., Folkestad, J. E., & Strzalkowski, T. (2018). Serious efforts at bias reduction: The effects of digital games and avatar customization on three cognitive biases. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 30(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000174
  • Steinke, J., Root-Bowman, M., Estabrook, S., Levine, D. S., & Kantor, L. M. (2017). Meeting the needs of sexual and gender minority youth: Formative research on potential digital health interventions. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60(5), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.11.023
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage.
  • Strauss, V. (2022, July 1). Florida law limiting LGBTQ discussions takes effect–and rocks schools. The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/07/01/dont-say-gay-florida-law/
  • Taylor, E. T., & Bryson, M. K. (2016). Cancer's margins: Trans* and gender non-conforming people's access to knowledge, experiences of cancer health, and decision-making. LGBT Health, 3(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2015.0096
  • Turan, B., Rogers, A. J., Rice, W. S., Atkins, G. C., Cohen, M. H., Wilson, T. E., Adimora, A. A., Merenstein, D., Adedimeji, A., Wentz, E. L., Ofotokun, I., Metsch, L., Tien, P. C., Johnson, M. O., Turan, J. M., & Weiser, S. D. (2017). Association between perceived discrimination in healthcare settings and HIV medication adherence: Mediating psychosocial mechanisms. AIDS and Behavior, 21(12), 3431–3439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1957-5
  • Veinot, T. C., Meadowbrooke, C. C., Loveluck, J., Hickok, A., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2013). How “community” matters for how people interact with information: Mixed methods study of young men who have sex with other men. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(2), e33. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2370
  • Vera, A. N., Wagner, T. L., & Kitzie, V. L. (2020). “When it’s time to come together, we come together”: Reconceptualizing theories of self-efficacy for health information practices within LGBTQIA+ communities. In Roles and Responsibilities of Libraries in Increasing Consumer Health Literacy and Reducing Health Disparities (pp. 263–282). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Wagner, T. L., & Kitzie, V. L. (2021). ‘Access necessitates being seen’: Queer visibility and intersectional embodiment within the health information practices of queer community leaders. Journal of Information Science, 01655515211040658.
  • Wagner, T. L., Kitzie, V. L., & Lookingbill, V. (2022). Transgender and nonbinary individuals and ICT-driven information practices in response to transexclusionary healthcare systems: A qualitative study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 29(2), 239–248.
  • Wyers, K. (2022). Leaving no-one behind? A research agenda for queer issues in ICT4D. IFIP WG 9.4 Freedom and Social Inclusion in a Connected World, Lima, Peru, 25–27 May 2022. Springer.
  • Zuppo, C. M. (2012). Defining ICT in a boundaryless world: The development of a working hierarchy. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 4(3), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmit.2012.4302

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.