Isozyme variation of Microsporum canis and M. cookei from New Zealand

References

• Georg LK, Camp LB. Routine nutritional tests for the identification of dermatophytes. J Bacteriol 1957; 57: 113–121
   Google Scholar
• Philpot CM. The use of nutritional tests for the identification of dermatophytes. Sabouraudia 1977; 77: 141–150
   Google Scholar
• Philpot CM. Serological differences among the dermatophytes. Sabouraudia 1978; 78: 247–256
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie DWR (1986) Antigenic composition and serology of dermatophytes. FEMS-Symposium of Dermatophytes and Dermatophytoses in Man and Animals. May, 198821–23, E Tümbay. IzmirTurkey, 31–38, In
   Google Scholar
• Polonelli L, Castagnola M, Morace G. Identification and serotyping of Microsporum canis isolates by monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 86: 609–615
   Google Scholar
• Ayala FJ. Molecular polymorphisms: how much is there and why?. Dev Genet 1984; 84: 379–391
   Google Scholar
• Michelmore RW, Hulbert SH. Molecular markers for genetic analysis of phytopathogenic fungi. Ann Rev Phytopathol 1987; 87: 383–404
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank RH. Pectic zymograms as criteria in taxonomy of Rhizoctonia. Mycol Res 1990; 90: 938–946
   Google Scholar
• Oudemans P, Coffey MD. Isozyme comparison within and among worldwide sources of three morphologically distinct species of Phytophthora. Mycol Res 1991; 91: 19–30
   Google Scholar
• Mills SD, Förster H, Coffey MD. Taxonomic structure of Phytophthora, Cryptogea and P. drechsleri based on isozyme and mitochondrial DNA analysis. Mycol Res 1991; 91: 31–48
   Google Scholar
• Selander RK, Musser JM. Population genetics of bacterial patho-genesis. Molecular Basis of Bacterial Pathogenesis, BH Inglewski, LV Clark. Academic Press, London 1990; xi: 11–36, In
   Google Scholar
• Jones MG, Noble WC. An electrophoretic study of enzymes as a tool in the taxonomy of dermatophytes. J Gen Microbiol 1982; 82: 1101–1107
   Google Scholar
• Tucker WDL, Noble WC. The value of electrophoretic patterns for the studyof Microsporum canis. J Med Vet Mycol 1990; 90: 117–123
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa A, Usui K. Nannizzia otae sp. nov., the perfect state of Microsporum canis Bodin. Jpn J Med Mycol 1975; 75: 148–153
   Google Scholar
• di Menna ME, Marples MJ. Microsporum distortum sp. nov. from New Zealand. Trans Br Mycol Soc 1954; 54: 372–374
   Google Scholar
• Simpanya MF, Baxter M. Isolation of fungi from soil using the keratin-baiting technique. Mycopathologia 1996; 96: 85–89
   Google Scholar
• Micales JA, Bonde MR, Peterson GL. The use of isozyme analysis in fungal taxonomy and genetics. Mycotaxon 1986; 86: 405–449
   Google Scholar
• IUB. Enzyme Nomenclature: International Union of Biochemistry Nomenclature Committee. Academic Press, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• Siciliano MJ, Shaw CR. Separation and visualisation of enzymes on gels. Chromatographic and Electrophoretic Techniques, vol. 2: Zone Electrophoreis4th edn., I Smith. William Heinemann Medical Books, New York 1976; 185–209, In
   Google Scholar
• Selander, RK, Caugant, DA, Ochman, H, et al. Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial population genetics and systematics. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986; 86: 873–884
   Google Scholar
• Clare BG, Flentje NT, Atkinson MR. Electrophoretic patterns of oxidoreductases and otherproteins as criteria in fungal taxonomy. Aust J Biol Sc 1968; 68: 275–295
   Google Scholar
• Harris M, Hopkinson DA. Handbook on Enzyme Electrophoresis in HumanGenetics. North-Holland Publishing Company, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Vallejos CE. Enzyme activity staining. Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Part A, SD Tanksley, TJ Orton. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1983; 469–516, In
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson L. systat: The system for statistics. Systat Inc, Evanston, IL 1986
   Google Scholar
• Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco 1973
   Google Scholar
• Ajello L. The ascigerous state of Microsporum cookei. Sabouraudia 1961; 61: 173–177
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman I, Summerball R. The dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995; 95: 240–259
   Google Scholar