Why strategic intelligence analysis has limited influence on American foreign policy

References

• Adams, Samuel A. War of Numbers: An Intelligence Memoir. Hanover, NH: Steerforth, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, Christopher. “An Agenda for Future Research.” In Eternal Vigilance? 50 Years of the CIA, edited by Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones and Christopher Andrew, 224–233. London: Frank Cass and Co, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Fulton T. “Ways to Make Analysis Relevant but Not Prescriptive.” Studies in Intelligence 46, no. 3 (2002): 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, Douglas. “Consumer versus Producer: Overcoming the Disconnect between Management and Competitive Intelligence.” Competitive Intelligence Review 10, no. 3 (1999): 19–26.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6386
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, Douglas. “Intelligence versus Policy: Healthy Tension or Lost Cause?” Competitive Intelligence Review 12, no. 4 (2009): 24–28 (Jul./Aug.).
   Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K. “American Strategic Intelligence: Politics, Priorities, and Direction.” In Intelligence Policy and National Security, edited by Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. and Uri Ra’anan, 245–267. Hamden, CT: The Macmillan Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K. “Analysis, War, and Decision: Why Intelligence Failures Are Inevitable.” World Politics 31, no. 01 (1978): 61–89 (Oct.).10.2307/2009967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K. Enemies of Intelligence: Knowledge and Power in American National Security. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, Richard K. “Policy‐Makers and Intelligence Analysts: Love, Hate or Indifference?” Intelligence and National Security 3, no. 1 (1988): 184–189.10.1080/02684528808431934
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Harold, et al. Preparing for the 21st Century: An Appraisal of US Intelligence, ‘The Need for Policy Guidance’.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, George W. Decision Points. New York: Crown Publishers, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Richard A. Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror. New York: Free Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cline, Ray S. “Opinion: Policy without Intelligence.” Foreign Policy 17, Winter (1974–1975): 121–135.10.2307/1148116
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Erik J. “Why Won’t They Listen? Comparing Receptivity toward Intelligence at Pearl Harbor and Midway.” Intelligence and National Security 28, No. 1 (2013): 68–90.10.1080/02684527.2012.749061
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Jack. “Intelligence Analysts and Policymakers: Benefits and Dangers of Tensions in the Relationship.” Intelligence and National Security 21, no. 6 (2006): 999–1021.10.1080/02684520601046325
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Jack. “The Challenge of Managing Uncertainty: Paul Wolfowitz on Intelligence-Policy Relations.” Studies in Intelligence 39, no. 5 (1996): 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Fingar, Thomas. Reducing Uncertainty: Intelligence Analysis and National Security. Stanford, CA: Stanford Security Studies, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Foer, Franklin, and Spencer Ackerman. 2003. “The Radical: What Dick Cheney Really Believes.” The New Republic, December 1 & 8.
   Google Scholar
• Forbush, Ramsey, Gary Chase, and Ron Goldberg. “CIA Intelligence Support for Foreign and National Security Policy Making.” Studies in Intelligence 20, no. 1 (1976): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, Harold P. “The U.S. Government’s Experience with Intelligence Analysis: Pluses and Minuses.” In Intelligence Analysis and Assessment, edited by David A. Charters, A. Stuart Farson, and Glenn P. Hastedt, 34–53. London: Frank Cass, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Frantz, Douglas, and Murray Waas. 1992.“CIA Failed to See Iraq’s Attack Plans, Gates Says: Intelligence: Agency Told Bush in 1989 That Hussein Would Not Strike for Two to Three Years.” Los Angeles times, May 9.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, Robert M. “An Opportunity Unfulfilled: The Use and Perceptions of Intelligence at the White House.” The Washington Quarterly 12, no. 1 (1989): 35–44.10.1080/01636608909443706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates, Robert M. “The CIA and American Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs 66, no. 2 (1987–1988): 215–230.10.2307/20043370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, Melvin A. Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Handel, Michael I. “The Politics of Intelligence.” Intelligence and National Security 2, no. 4 (1987): 5–46.
   Google Scholar
• Harkabi, Yehoshafat. “The Intelligence-Policymaker Tangle.” Jerusalem Quarterly 30, Winter (1984): 125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, Michael. Intelligence Power in Peace and War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 41.10.1017/CBO9780511521737
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, Richards. Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsman, Roger. “Intelligence and Policy-Making in Foreign Affairs.” World Politics 5, no. 2 (1952): 1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Thomas L. The Fate of Facts in a World of Men, Headline Series No. 233. New York: Foreign Policy Association, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Hulnick, Arthur S., and Deborah Brammer. The Impact of Intelligence on the Policy Review and Decision Process. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, Center for the Study of Intelligence, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Immerman, Richard H. “Intelligence and Strategy: Historicizing Psychology, Policy and Politics.” Diplomatic History 32, no. 1 (2008): 1–23.10.1111/j.1467-7709.2007.00675.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert. “Strategic Intelligence and Effective Policy.” In Security and Intelligence in a Changing World: New Perspectives for the 1990s, edited by A. Stuart Farson, David Stafford, and Wesley K. Wark, 165–181. London: Frank Cass, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert. “Why Intelligence and Policymakers Clash.” Political Science Quarterly. 125, no. 2 (2010): 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, Willmoore. “The Function of Intelligence.” World Politics. 1, no. 4 (1949): 542–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, Sherman. Strategic Intelligence for American World Policy. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1949 (Reprinted).
   Google Scholar
• Kerbel, Joshua, and Anthony Olcott. “The Intelligence-Policy Nexus.” Studies in Intelligence. 54, no. 4 (2010): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, Richard J. “The Track Record: CIA Analysis from 1950 to 2000.” In Analyzing Intelligence: Origins, Obstacles, and Innovations, edited by Roger Z. George and James B. Bruce, 35–54. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr, Klaus E. Foreign Intelligence and the Social Sciences. Research Monograph No. 17. Center of International Studies. Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. Princeton University, June 1, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, Mark M. “Grant Vs. Sherman: Paradoxes of Intelligence and Combat Leadership.” In Paradoxes of Strategic Intelligence: Essays in Honor of Michael I. Handel, edited by Richard K. Betts and Thomas G. Mahnken, 190–202. New York: Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, Mark M. 2008. “The Real Intelligence Failure? Spineless Spies.” The Washington Post, May 25, B01.
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, Stephen. “Intelligence Analysis and Decisionmaking: Methodological Challenges.” In Intelligence Theory: Key Questions and Debates, edited by P. Gill, S. Marrin, and M. Phythian, 131–150. London: Routledge, 2008.10.4324/SE0788
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, Stephen. “Intelligence Analysis Theory: Explaining and Predicting Analytic Responsibilities.” Intelligence and National Security. 22, no. 6 (2007): 821–846.10.1080/02684520701770634
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, Stephen. “The 9/11 Terrorist Attacks: A Failure of Policy Not Strategic Intelligence Analysis.” Intelligence and National Security 26, no. 2–3 (2011): 182–202.10.1080/02684527.2011.559140
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, Stephen, and Philip H. J. Davies. “National Assessment by the National Security Council Staff 1968-80: An American Experiment in a British Style of Analysis?.” Intelligence and National Security 24, no. 5 (2009): 644–673.10.1080/02684520903209407
   Google Scholar
• May, Ernest R. Strange Victory: Hitler’s Conquest of France. New York, NY: Hill and Wang, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• May, Ernest R. and Philip D. Zelikow. “Seven Tenets.” In Dealing with Dictators: Dilemmas of U.S. Diplomacy and Intelligence Analysis, edited by May and Zelikow, 1945–1980. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. New York: Norton, 2004a.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. Staff Statement No. 7: Intelligence and Policy.11. 2004b.
   Google Scholar
• Omand, David. Securing the State. New York, NY: C. Hurst & Co, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Martin. “The Challenge for the Political Analyst: Advice from a DI Careerist.” Studies in Intelligence 47, no. 1 (2003): 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Martin. “What I Learned in 40 Years of Doing Intelligence Analysis for US Foreign Policymakers.” Studies in Intelligence 55, no. 1 (2011): 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Pillar, R. 2004. “A Scapegoat is Not a Solution.” New York Times, June 4.
   Google Scholar
• Pillar, Paul R. Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy: Iraq, 9/11, and Misguided Reform, 96–120. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pillar, Paul R. “Intelligence, Policy, and the War in Iraq.” Foreign Affairs 85, no. 2 (2006): 15–27.10.2307/20031908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poteat, George. “The Intelligence Gap: Hypotheses on the Process of Surprise.” Intelligence Studies Notes, no. 3 (1976): 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Preparing for the 21st Century: An Appraisal of U.S. Intelligence, “Commission the Roles and Capabilities of the United States Intelligence Community,” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office), March 1, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, Jerry H. “Intelligence-Led Policing.” In Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis, edited by R. Wortley, L. Mazerolle, and S. Rombouts, 263–282. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Rovner, Joshua. Fixing the Facts. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.10.7591/cornell/9780801448294.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Rovner, Joshua, Austin Long, and Amy Zegart. “How Intelligent is Intelligence Reform?” International Security 30, no. 4 (2006): 196–208. 20310.1162/isec.2006.30.4.196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Richard L. “CIA’s Strategic Intelligence in Iraq.” Political Science Quarterly 117, no. 2 (2002): 191–207.10.2307/798180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Richard L. Sharpening Strategic Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511509902
   Google Scholar
• Shreeve, Thomas W. “The Intelligence Community Case Method Program: A National Intelligence Estimate on Yugoslavia.” In Intelligence and the National Security Strategist, edited by Roger Z. George and Robert D. Kline, 327–340. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, James B. “The Policymaker’s Perspective: Transparency and Partnership.” In Analyzing Intelligence: Origins, Obstacles and Innovations, edited by Roger George and James Bruce, 88–89. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• The Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on the Future of U.S. Intelligence. In from the Cold: The Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on the Future of US Intelligence. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Treverton, Gregory F. Reshaping National Intelligence for an Age of Information. Cambridge University Press, 2001.10.1017/CBO9780511754470
   Google Scholar
• US Central Intelligence Agency. National Estimates: An Assessment of the Product and the Process. Intelligence Monograph. Central Intelligence Agency: Center for the Study of Intelligence. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 1977 (Apr.).
   Google Scholar
• US National Intelligence Council. Intelligence Community Assessment: Principal Challenges in Post-Saddam Iraq, 2003a (Jan.).
   Google Scholar
• US National Intelligence Council. Intelligence Community Assessment: Regional Consequences of Regime Change in Iraq. 2003b (Jan.).
   Google Scholar
• US National Intelligence Council. National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) 15-90: Yugoslavia Transformed. 1990 (Oct.).
   Google Scholar
• US National Intelligence Council. National Intelligence Estimate (NIE): Iraq’s Continuing Programs for Weapons of Mass Destruction. 2002 (Oct.).
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, Geoffrey. The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, Benno. “The Failure of Intelligence Prediction.” Political Studies. 8, no. 2 (1960): 156–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, Dennis. “An Educated Consumer is Our Best Customer.” Studies in Intelligence 55, no. 2 (2011): 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfowitz, Paul. Comments to Douglas J. MacEachin’s “The Tradecraft of Analysis.” In US Intelligence at the Crossroads: Agendas for Reform, edited by Roy Godson, Ernest R May, and Gary Schmitt, 63–85. Washington, DC: National Strategy Information Center, 1995.
   Google Scholar