Weighing the evidence: the BCISS Iraq HUMINT Analytic Matrix Exercise

Bibliography

• Booth, Robert David. State Department Counterintelligence: Spies, Leaks and Lies. Dallas, TX: Brown Books Publishing Group, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bensinger, Ken, Miriam Elder, and Mark Schoofs. 2017. “These Reports Allege Trump Has Deep Ties to Russia.” Buzzfeed, January 10. Accessed April 15. https://www.buzzfeed.com/kenbensinger/these-reports-allege-trump-has-deep-ties-to-russia?utm_term=.jheD5OmKJ#.htWO4Y23q
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Lord Robin. Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction. London: The Stationery Office [TSO], 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Chilcot, John. Report of the Iraq Inquiry. London: Willams Lea Group, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Clausewitz, Carl von. On War. Translated by Howard & Paret. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States. Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction (Aka WMD Commission) Report to the President of the United States. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing, Office, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Erik. Intelligence and Surprise Attack: Failure and Success from Pearl Harbor to 9/11 and beyond. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Philip H. J. “Assessment BASE: Simulating National Intelligence Assessment in a Graduate Course.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 19, No. 4 (2006): 721–736.10.1080/08850600600829940
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Philip H. J. “Collection and Analysis on Iraq: A Critical Look at Britain’s Spy Machinery.” Studies in Intelligence 49, no. 4 (2005): 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Philip H. J. “Jointery versus Tradecraft.” In The Art of Intelligence: Simulations, Exercises and Games, edited by William Lahneman and Ruben Arcos, 203–222. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Philip H. J. MI6 and the Machinery of Spying. London: Frank Cass, 2004.10.4324/SE0788
   Google Scholar
• Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC). JDP 2-00: Understanding and Intelligence Support to Joint Operations. 3rd ed. Shrivenham: DCDC, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dylan, Huw. “Thinking about Defence Intelligence: Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, Denis Capel-Dunn, Kenneth Strong and the Joint Intelligence Bureau as Foundation for the Defence Intelligence Staff.” Intelligence and National Security 31, no. 6 (2016): 829–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Barney, David Lawler, and Louise Burke. 2017. “Donald Trump Attacks Alleged Russian Dossier as “Fake News” and Slams Buzzfeed and CNN at Press Conference.” The Telegraph, January 17. Accessed April 15.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, Richards. The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. Washington, DC: Center for Intelligence Studies, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, Richards, and Randolph H. Pherson. Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis. Washington, DC: CQPress, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee. The Decision to Go to War in IraqHC 813-I. London: The Stationery Office, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, Lord Brian. Report of the Inquiry into the Circumstances Surrounding the Death of Dr. David Kelly C.M.G. London: TSO, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• i2 Homepage. Accessed April 17, 2017. https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/enterprise-intelligence-analysis
   Google Scholar
• Intelligence and Security Committee. Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction: Intelligence and Assessments. London: TSO, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Chiefs of Staff. JP 2-01 Joint and National Intelligence Support to Military Operations. Washington, DC: Department of Defence, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jomini, Antoine Henri. Art of War. Translated by Mendell & Craighill. Rockville, MD: Arc Manor, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachin, Douglas. “The Tradecraft of Analysis.” In US Intelligence at the Crossroads: Agendas for Reform, edited by Roy Godfson, Ernest R. May, and Gary Schmitt, 63–74. Washington, DC: Brassey’s, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Paterva Maltego Homepage. Accessed April 17, 2017. https://www.paterva.com/web7/
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, Stephen. Improving Intelligence Analysis: Bridging the Gap between Scholarship and Practice. London: Routlege, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mencken, Henry Louis. Prejudices: Second Series. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1920.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios, José-Miguel. “Intelligence Analysis Training: A European Perspective.” International Journal of Intelligence, Security and Public Affairs 18, no. 1 (2016): 34–56.
   Google Scholar
• Palantir Homepage. Accessed April 17, 2017. https://www.palantir.com/
   Google Scholar
• Palo Alto Research Centre. “ACH2.0.5 Download Page.” Accessed April 14, 2017. http://www2.parc.com/istl/projects/ach/ach.html
   Google Scholar
• Professional Head of Defence Intelligence Analysis (PODIA). Quick Wins for Busy Analysts. London: Ministry of Defence, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, Christopher. “The Trump Russia Dossier.” Accessed April 15, 2017. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984-Trump-Intelligence-Allegations.html
   Google Scholar
• Stober, Dan, and Ian Hoffman. A Convenient Spy: Wen Ho Lee and the Politics of Nuclear Espionage. London: Simon & Schuster, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, Kenneth. Men of Intelligence. London: Cassell, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, Abigail. 2017. “What Intelligence Experts Think of the Explosive Trump-Russia Report.” Vanity Fair, January 11.
   Google Scholar
• United States Army. FM 34-60 Counterintelligence. Washington, DC: Headquarters of the Army, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• US Government. A Tradecraft Primer: Structured Analytic Techniques for Improving Intelligence Analysis. Washington, DC: Centre for the Study of Intelligence, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Bob. Plan of Attack. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004.
   Google Scholar