Bibliography
- Duke, Misty C., and Damien Van Puyvelde. “What Science Can Teach Us about “Enhanced Interrogation” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 30, no. 2 (2017): 310–339.10.1080/08850607.2016.123070710.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.13150110.1080/02684527.2016.1238568
- Hajjar, Lisa. “Does Torture Work? A Sociolegal Assessment of the Practice in Historical and Global Perspective.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5 (2009): 311–345.
- Harries, Emma. “The Incoherence of the Only Serious Argument for Torture.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 2 (2017): 161–178.
- Hayden, Michael V. Playing to the Edge: American Intelligence in the Age of Terror. New York: Penguin, 2016.
- Intelligence Science Board. Educing Information: Interrogation: Science and Art, Foundations for the Future, Phase 1 Report. Washington, DC: National Defense Intelligence College Press, 2006.
- PBS NewsHour. “Is Torture Effective for Gathering Intelligence?—Part 2.” Aired December 10, 2014. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/torture-effective-gathering-intelligence/
- Pfiffner, P. “The Efficacy of Coercive Interrogation.” In Examining Torture: Empirical Studies of State Repression, edited by Tracy Lightcap and James P. Pfiffner, 127–158. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
- Rejali, Darius. Torture and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.
- Rumney, Philip, N. S. “Is Coercive Interrogation of Terrorist Suspects Effective? A Response to Bagaric and Clarke.” University of San Francisco Law Review 40 (2006): 479–513.
- U.S. Senate. Report of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program, December 9, 2014.