EU INTCEN: a transnational European culture of intelligence analysis?

Bibliography

• Arcos, R., and J.-M. Palacios. “The Impact of Intelligence on decision-making: The EU and the Arab Spring.” Intelligence and National Security 33, no. 5 (2018): 737–754. doi:10.1080/02684527.2018.1434449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “The Art of Intelligence Analysis.” Studies in Intelligence 30, (1986): 3.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, B. D., and A. E. Goodman. Best Truth: Intelligence in the Information Age. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bruxelles2. “L’IntCen… Le Lieu Des Échanges … D’analyses Top Secret.” Bruxelles 2, (January 21, 2015). http://www.bruxelles2.eu/2015/01/21/que-fait-lintcen-europeen
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W., E. Berdini, D. R. Mandel, and P. E. Tetlock. “Restructuring Structured Analytic Techniques in Intelligence.” Intelligence and National Security 33, no. 3 (2018): 337–356. doi:10.1080/02684527.2017.1400230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauser, J. K., and S. Weir. Intelligence Research Methodology: An Introduction to Techniques and Procedures for Conducting Research in Defense Intelligence. Washington DC: Defense Intelligence School, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthart, S. “Why Do Analysts Use Structured Analytic Techniques? an In-depth Study of an American Intelligence Agency.” Intelligence and National Security 31 (2016): 933–948. doi:10.1080/02684527.2016.1140327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis Cross, M. K. “A European Transgovernmental Intelligence Network and the Role of IntCen.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14 (2013): 388–402. doi:10.1080/15705854.2013.817805.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaff, B., and J. M. Nyce. Handbook of European Intelligence Cultures. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Defense Intelligence Agency. A Tradecraft Primer: Basic Structured Analytic Techniques. (March 2008). Washington, DC: Defense Intelligence Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Dhami, M. K., D. R. Mandel, B. A. Mellers, and P. E. Tetlock. “Improving Intelligence Analysis With Decision Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 10, no. 6 (2015): 753–757. doi:10.1177/1745691615598511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament. “Answer Given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on Behalf of the Commission.” Parliamentary Questions, E-009092/2012, 13 December 2012. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2012-009092&language=EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. “Answer Given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on Behalf of the Commission.” Parliamentary Questions, E-006017/2012, 25 July 2012. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2012-006017&language=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Folker, R. D. “Intelligence Analysis in the Theater Joint Intelligence Centers: An Experiment in Applying Structured Methods.” Occasional Paper No 7. Washington DC: Joint Military, January 2000. https://fas.org/irp/eprint/folker.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. J. Quantitative Approaches to Political Intelligence: The CIA Experience. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. “Strategies for Analytical Judgment.” Studies in Intelligence 25, no. 2 ( Summer 1981): 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. J. Rethinking Intelligence: Richards J. Heuer Jr.’s Life of Public Service. Reston VA: Pherson Associates, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. J., and R. H. Pherson. Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis. Washington DC: CQ Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, E. H., D. V. Budescu, M. K. Dhami, and D. R. Mandel. “Improving the Communication of Uncertainty in Climate Science and Intelligence Analysis.” Behavioral Science & Policy 1, no. 2 (2015): 43–55. doi:10.1353/bsp.2015.0015.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Third ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords. “Evidence Given by Former SITCEN Director William Shapcott before the Select Committee on the European Union, House of Lords, on 6 December 2010.” http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/eu-sub-com-f/ISS/cEUF061210ev2ISS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ignatius, D. “Spy World Success Story.” Washington post 2, May (2004): B07.
   Google Scholar
• Kier, E. “Culture and French Military Doctrine before World War II.” In The Culture of National Security Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by P. J. Katzenstein, 186–215, Columbia, New York University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, D. R., C. W. Karvetski, and M. K. Dhami. “Boosting Intelligence Analysts’ Judgment Accuracy: What Works, What Fails?” Judgment and Decision Making 13, no. 6 (2018). http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/25593/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrin, S. “Intelligence Analysis: Structured Methods or Intuition.” American Intelligence Journal 27, no. 1 ( Summer, 2007): 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, S. “Training and Educating US Intelligence Analysts.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 22 (2009): 131–146. doi:10.1080/08850600802486986.
   Google Scholar
• Matei, M. “Structured Analytical Techniques in International Intelligence Vs National Intelligence.” Intelligence Studies Section Panels at ISA 2015, February 2014, New Orleans. Unpublished conference paper.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Intelligence Analysis for Tomorrow: Advances from the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Committee on Behavioral and Social Science Research to Improve Intelligence Analysis for National Security, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios, J.-M. “Intelligence Analysis Training: A European Perspective.” The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs 18, no. 1 (2016): 34–56. doi:10.1080/23800992.2016.1150684.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios, J.-M. “Hacia un concepto europeo de inteligencia.” Inteligencia y Seguridad. Revista de Análisis y Prospectiva 16 (2104): 99–123.
   Google Scholar
• Pherson, R. Handbook of Analytic Tools & Techniques. Reston VA: Pherson Associates, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pherson, R. H., J. Heuer, and J. Richards. “Structured Analytic Techniques: A New Approach to Analysis.” In Analyzing Intelligence: National Security Practitioners’ Perspectives, R. Z. George, ed. Second ed. (Kindle version), 231–235. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Reichheld, F. F. “The One Number You Need to Grow.” Harvard Business Review 81, no. 12 (2003): 46–54, 124. Available at. https://hbr.org/2003/12/the-one-number-you-need-to-grow
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. The Art and Science of Intelligence Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Richelson, J. T. The US Intelligence Community. 6th ed (Kindle Version). Philadelphia: Westview Press, 2012
   Google Scholar
• Rood, J. “Inside the One Spy Agency that Got Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq—And Much Else—Right.” Washington Monthly, January/February 2005. http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0501.rood.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rüter, J. European External Intelligence Co-operation. Structures, Problems, Implications and Perspectives. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr Müller, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. Organizational Culture and Leadership. 5th ed Kindle Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2017
   Google Scholar
• Sénat. “Projet de loi de finances pour 2016 : Défense : Environnement et prospective de la politique de défense.” Rapports législatifs, 19 November 2015. http://www.senat.fr/rap/a15-166-5/a15-166-54.html.
   Google Scholar
• US Government. “A Tradecraft Primer: Structured Analytic Techniques for Improving Intelligence Analysis.” March 2009. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/publications-rss-updates/tradecraft-primer-may-4-2009.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wallsten, T. S., D. V. Budescu, R. Zwick, and S. M. Kemp. “Preferences and Reasons for Communicating Probabilistic Information in Verbal or Numerical Terms.” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31, no. 2 (1993): 135–138. doi:10.3758/BF03334162.
   Google Scholar
• Zaki, M., D. Kandeil, A. Neely, and J. R. McColl-Kennedy. The Fallacy of the Net Promoter Score: Customer Loyalty Predictive Model. Cambridge Service Alliance. October 2016. https://cambridgeservicealliance.eng.cam.ac.uk/resources/Downloads/Monthly%20Papers/2016OctoberPaper_FallacyoftheNetPromoterScore.pdf
   Google Scholar