Threat potential of pharmaceutical based agents

Bibliography

• Amlot, R., J. Larner, H. Matar, D. Jones, H. Carter, E. Turner, S. Price, and R. Chilcott. “Comparative Analysis of Showering Protocols for Mass-casualty Decontamination.” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 25, no. 5 (2010): 435. doi:10.1017/S1049023X00008529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arce, R. “Major Fentanyl Shipment from China Seized in Mexico.” Breitbart. Accessed 22 November 2019. https://www.breitbart.com/border/2019/08/25/25-tons-of-fentanyl-from-china-seized-in-mexico/
   Google Scholar
• Banks, D. Medical Management of Chemical Casualties Handbook. Fifth ed. Fort Sam Houston, Texas: Borden Institute, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Biomedical Advanced Research Development Authority (BARDA). Primary Response Incident Scene Management (PRISM) Guidance for Chemical Incidents Vols 1-3. Washington DC, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Blain, P. “Human Incapacitants.” Chap. 57. In Clinical Neurotoxicology: Syndromes, Substances, Environments, edited by M. Dobbs, 660–673. Elsevier, Philadelphia, USA, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• BMA. The Use of Drugs as Weapons: The Concerns and Responsibilities of Healthcare Professionals. BMA Board of Science, London, UK, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Borden Institute (U.S.) and U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense. Field Management of Chemical and Biological Casualties Handbook. Fifth ed. Fort Sam Houston, Texas: Borden Institute, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, A., and S. Bland. “Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Considerations in a Major Incident.” Surgery (United Kingdom) 33, no. 9 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.mpsur.2015.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Capoun, T., and J. Krykorkova. “Comparison of Selected Methods for Individual Decontamination of Chemical Warfare Agents.” Toxics 2, no. 2 (2014): 307–326. doi:10.3390/toxics2020307.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, H., J. Drury, G. Rubin, R. Williams, and R. Amlôt. “Emergency Responders’ Experiences of and Expectations regarding Decontamination.” International Journal of Emergency Services 3, no. 2 (2014): 179–192. doi:10.1108/IJES-08-2013-0022.
   Google Scholar
• CDC. “Hierarchy of Risk Controls.” CDC. Accessed 22 November 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hierarchy/default.html
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. “Fentanyl - Preventing Occupational Exposure to Emergency Responders.” CDC. Accessed 22 November 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/fentanyl/risk.html
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, S., R. D’Cruz, S. Faruqi, K. K. Singh, S. Varma, M. Singh, and V. Karthik. “Chemical Warfare Agents.” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 26, no. 2 (2008): 113. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2008.03.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilcott, R. “Managing Mass Casualties and Decontamination.” Environment International 72 (2014): 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilcott, R., J. Larner, and H. Matar. “The United Kingdom’s Initial Operational Response and Specialist Operational Response to CBRN and HazMat Incidents: A Primer on Decontamination Protocols for Healthcare Professionals.” Emergency Medicine Journal 36, no. 8 (2019): 117. doi:10.1136/emermed-2019-208798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEA. DEA Intelligence Brief: Fentanyl Remains the Most Significant Synthetic Opioid Threat and Poses the Greatest Threat to the Opioid User Market in the United States. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J., and R. Amlôt. “Modelling Mass Casualty Decontamination Systems Informed by Field Exercise Data.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9, no. 10 (2012): 3685. doi:10.3390/ijerph9103685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, K., and A. Pande. “A Convenient One Pot Synthesis of Fentanyl.” Journal of Chemical Research 2005, no. 7 (2005): 452. doi:10.3184/030823405774309078.
   Google Scholar
• Holdsworth, D., S. Bland, and D. O’Reilly. “CBRN Response and the Future.” Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 158, no. 1 (2012): 58. doi:10.1136/jramc-158-01-15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization (ISO). 2009. “Risk Management: Principles and Guidelines.” Chap. Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Krieger, K., R. Amlot, and M. Rogers. “Understanding Public Responses to Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear incidents-Driving Factors, Emerging Themes and Research Gaps.” Environment International 72 (2014): 66–74. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., R. Goel, R. Chawla, M. Silambarasan, and R. Sharma. “Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Decontamination: Recent Trends and Future Perspective.” Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 2, no. 3 (2010): 220–238. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.68505.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monteith, R., and L. Pearce. “Self-care Decontamination within a Chemical Exposure Mass-casualty Incident.” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 30, no. 3 (2015): 288–296. doi:10.1017/S1049023X15004677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. “Fentanyl Opens a Grave New Health Security Threat: Synthetic Opioids.” Centre for International and Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• NSABB. Recommendations for the Evaluation and Oversight of Proposed Gain-of-function Research. National Institutes of Health, Washington, DC, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• OPEM. Strategies for First Receiver Decontamination. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. “Risk Management in A Dynamic Society: A Modelling Problem.” Safety Science 27, no. 2–3 (1997): 183–213. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riches, J., R. Read, R. Black, N. Cooper, and C. Timperley. “Analysis of Clothing and Urine from Moscow Theatre Siege Casualties Reveals Carfentanil and Remifentanil Use.” Journal of Analytical Toxicology 36, no. 9 (2012): 647–656. doi:10.1093/jat/bks078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. Guidance for Health Facilities on Surface Decontamination of Self-Presenting Persons Potentially Exposed to Hazardous Chemical, Biological or Radiological Substances. NHS Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, B., G. Prasad, K. Pandey, R. Danikhel, and R. Vijayaraghavan. “Decontamination of Chemical Warfare Agents.” Defence Science Journal 60, no. 4 (2010): 428. doi:10.14429/dsj.60.487.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. “Homeland Security Is Reportedly considering Labeling Fentanyl as a Weapon of Mass Destruction.” CNBC. Washington DC: CNBC, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Chemical Biological, Radiological and Nuclear School. Updated Guidelines for Mass Casualty Decontamination during a HAZMAT/Weapon of Mass Destruction Incident, Volumes I and II. US Army, Fort Leonard Wood, MO, USA, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Homeland Security. Patient Decontamination in a Mass Chemical Exposure Incident: National Planning Guidance for Communities. US Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• US RDECOM & ECBC. Guidelines for Mass Casualty Decontamination during an Hazmat/Weapon of Mass Destruction Incident: Volumes I and II. U.S. Army Chemical Biological, Radiological and Nuclear School, Washington, DC, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Valdez, C., R. Leif, and B. Mayer. “An Efficient, Optimized Synthesis of Fentanyl and Related Analogs.” PLoS ONE 9, no. 9 (2014): e108250. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar