Bibliography
- Bajema, N. E., D. DiEuliis, C. Lutes, and Y. B. Lim. “The Digitization of Biology: Understanding the New Risks and Implications for Governance.” Research Paper No.3, Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Washington, DC: National Defense University, 2018.
- Brockman, K., S. Bauer, and V. Boulanin. Bio Plus X: Arms Control and the Convergence of Biology and Emerging Technologies. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2019.
- Butler, L. R. 2004. “Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction.” Report of a Committee of Privy Counsellors, July 14. http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/14_07_04_butler.pdf
- Carus, S. W. Bioterrorism and Biocrimes: The Illicit Use of Biological Agents since 1900. Center for Counterproliferation Research. Washington, DC: National Defense University, 1998.
- Carus, S. W. “RISE, The Rajneeshees, Aum Shinrikyo and Bruce Ivins.” In Biological Threats in the 21st Century: The Politics, People, Science and Historical Roots, edited by F. Lentzos. London: Imperial College Press, pp. 171–197, 2016.
- Carus, S. W. “A Century of Biological-weapons Programs, 1915–2015: Reviewing the Evidence.” Nonproliferation Review 24, no. 1–2 (2017): 129–153. doi:10.1080/10736700.2017.1385765.
- DARPA. Darpa: 1958–2018. Tampa, FL: Faircount Media Group, 2018. https://issuu.com/faircountmedia/docs/darpa_publication/1?ff
- Dover, R., and M. Goodman. “Impactful Scholarship in Intelligence: A Public Policy Challenge.” British Politics 13, no. 3 (2018): 374–391. doi:10.1057/s41293-018-0078-8.
- Dover, R., M. Goodman, and M. White. “Two Worlds, One Common Pursuit: Why Greater Engagement with the Academic Community Could Benefit the UK’s National Security.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Security, Risk and Intelligence, edited by Dover, R., H. Dylan and M. Goodman, pp. 461–478. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
- Dunlap, G., and E. Pauwels. The Intelligent and Connected Bio-Labs of the Future: Promise and Peril in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Washington, DC: Wilson Center, 2017.
- Government Office for Science. Blackett Review of High Impact Low Probability Risks. London: Government Office for Science, 2004. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/278526/12-519-blackett-review-high-impact-low-probability-risks.pdf
- Guillemin, J. Biological Weapons: From the Invention of State-sponsored Programs to Contemporary Bioterrorism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
- HM Government. “Areas of Research Interest.” June 28, 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/areas-of-research-interest
- Hoffman, D. 2012. “Genetic Weapons You Say.” Foreign Policy, March 27. http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/03/27/genetic-weapons-you-say/
- Inter-Academy Partnership. The Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention: Implications of Advances in Science and Technology. London: Royal Society, 2015.
- Lentzos, F. Biological Threats in the 21st Century: The Politics, People, Science and Historical Roots. London: Imperial College Press, 2016.
- Lentzos, F. “The Russian Disinformation Attack that Poses a Biological Danger.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (November 19, 2018). https://thebulletin.org/2018/11/the-russian-disinformation-attack-that-poses-a-biological-danger/.
- Lentzos, F., and C. Invernizzi. 2019. “Laboratories in the Cloud”. The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, July 2. https://thebulletin.org/2019/07/laboratories-in-the-cloud/
- Lentzos, F., and J. Littlewood. “DARPA’s Prepare Program: Preparing for What?” The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, July 26, 2018. https://thebulletin.org/2018/07/darpas-prepare-program-preparing-for-what
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. Dual Use Research of Concern in the Life Sciences: Current Issues and Controversies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2017.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018.
- National Research Council. Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.
- National Research Council. Intelligence Analysis for Tomorrow: Advances from the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.
- National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity. Proposed Framework for the Oversight of Dual Use Life Sciences Research: Strategies for Minimizing the Potential Misuse of Research Information. Washington, DC: NSABB, 2007.
- Nolan, B. “Ethnographic Research in the US Intelligence Community: Opportunities and Challenges.” Secrecy and Society 2 (2018): 1.
- Pauwels, E. The New Geopolitics of Converging Risks: The UN and Prevention in the Era of AI. New York: United Nations University Centre for Policy Research, 2019.
- Pellerin, C. 2017. “DoD Officials Discuss Countering WMD, Threats Posed by Synthetic Biology.” US Department of Defense News, March 23. https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/1128356/dod-officials-discuss-countering-wmd-threats-posed-by-synthetic-biology/
- US Department of State. Report on Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments. Washington, DC: US Department of State, April 17, 2018.
- Vogel, K. Phantom Menace or Looming Danger? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.
- Vogel, K., and B. Balmer. “Secrecy and Intelligence: Introduction.” Secrecy and Society 2 (2018): 1.
- Vogel, K., and C. Knight. “Analytic Outreach for Intelligence: Insights from a Workshop on Emerging Biotechnology Threats.” Intelligence and National Security 30 (2015): 686–703. doi:10.1080/02684527.2014.887633.
- White House, Office of the Press Secretary. Remarks by President Obama in Address to the United Nations General Assembly. New York: United nations, September 21, 2011. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/21/remarks-president-obama-address-united-nations-general-assembly
- World Health Organisation. “Preparedness for the Deliberate Use of Biological Agents: A Rational Approach to the Unthinkable.” WHO/CDS/CSR/EPH/2002.16. Geneva: WHO, 2002.
- World Health Organisation. WHO Director-General Addresses UN Security Council on Ebola. New York: UN Security Council, September 18, 2014. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/2014/security-council-ebola/en/
- Wright, S. “Terrorists and Biological Weapons: Forging the Linkage in the Clinton Administration.” Politics and the Life Sciences 25, no. 1–2 (2007): 57–115. doi:10.2990/1471-5457(2006)25[57:TABW]2.0.CO;2.