Integrating intelligence theory with philosophy: introduction to the special issue

Bibliography

• Andregg, M. Intelligence Ethics, St. Paul, MN: Ground Zero, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, C. M. and D. Dilks, eds. The Missing Dimension: Government and Intelligence Communities in the Twentieth Century. London: Macmillan, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bellaby, R. Ethics and Intelligence: A New Framework. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, R. “The Value of Philosophy”. In the Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, J. “Making Analysis More Reliable: Why Epistemology Matters to Intelligence.” In Analyzing Intelligence: Origins, Obstacles, and Innovations, edited by George R. Z. and J. B. Bruce. Washington. DC: Georgetown University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. H. J. “Theory and intelligence reconsidered”. In Intelligence Theory: Key Questions and Debates, edited P. Gill, S. Marrin, and M. Phythian. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Der Derian, J. “Anti‐diplomacy, Intelligence Theory and Surveillance Practice.” Intelligence and National Security 8, no. 3 (1993): 29–51. doi:10.1080/02684529308432213.
   Google Scholar
• Der Derian, J., and A. Wendt, eds. Quantum International Relations: A Human Science for World Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Dilks, D. (ed). Diaries of Sir Alexander Cadogan O.M., 1938-1945. New York, NY: Putnam, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Dujmovic, N. “Less Is More, and More Professional: Reflections on Building an ‘Ideal’ Intelligence Program.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 7 (2017): 935–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox Jr, J. F., Jr. “Intelligence in the Socratic Philosophers.” Intelligence and National Security 33, no. 4 (2018): 491–501. doi:10.1080/02684527.2018.1452564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspard, J. J. S. “Intelligence without Essence: Rejecting the Classical Theory of Definition.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 30, no. 3 (2017): 557–582. doi:10.1080/08850607.2017.1263527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, P., S. Marrin, Stephen, and M. Phythian, eds. Developing Intelligence Theory: New Challenges and Competing Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Glees, A. “The Future of Intelligence Studies.” Journal of Strategic Security 6:3, no. 3 (2013): 124–127. doi:10.5038/1944-0472.6.3S.13.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, J. “The Ethics of Research in Intelligence Studies: Scholarship in an Emerging Discipline.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 31, no. 2 (2018): 342–356. doi:10.1080/08850607.2018.1417638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, J. “Spying Properly.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 32, no. 1 (2019): 208–213. doi:10.1080/08850607.2018.1524251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, J. M. “An Ethical Defense of Treason by Means of Espionage.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 2 (2017): 195–207. doi:10.1080/02684527.2016.1248571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawking, S. and Mlodinow, L. The Grand Design. London: Bantam Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, N. Reasoning for Intelligence Analysts: A Multidimensional Approach of Traits, Techniques, and Targets. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, M. Intelligence Power in Peace and War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, G. The Advancement of Science, and Its Burdens: With a New Introduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, E. “Knowing the Enemy: The Epistemology of Secret Intelligence.” Grey Room 11 (2003): 58–85. doi:10.1162/15263810360661435.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. “Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth.” The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4, no. 6 (1907): 141–155. doi:10.2307/2012189.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. Critique of Pure Reason. 1787.
   Google Scholar
• Lillbacka, R. “Realism, Constructivism, and Intelligence Analysis.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 26, no. 2 (2013): 304–331. doi:10.1080/08850607.2013.732450.
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, S. “Analytic Objectivity and Science: Evaluating the US Intelligence Community’s Approach to Applied Epistemology.” Intelligence and National Security 35, no. 3 (2020): 350–366. doi:10.1080/02684527.2019.1710806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurath, O. ‘Anti-spengler’ - Empiricism and Sociology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, B. Barnett Newman: Selected Writings and Interviews. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Omand, D., and M. Phythian. “Ethics and Intelligence: A Debate.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 26, no. 1 (2013): 38–63. doi:10.1080/08850607.2012.705186.
   Google Scholar
• Phythian, M. “Intelligence and the Liberal Conscience.” Intelligence and National Security 33, no. 4 (2018): 502–516. doi:10.1080/02684527.2018.1456637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pili, G. “Toward a Philosophical Definition of Intelligence.” The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs 21, no. 2 (2019): 162–190. doi:10.1080/23800992.2019.1649113.
   Google Scholar
• Rogg, J. P. “‘Quo Vadis?’A Comparatist Meets a Theorist Searching for a Grand Theory of Intelligence.” Intelligence and National Security 33, no. 4 (2018): 541–552. doi:10.1080/02684527.2018.1452575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbridger, A. “.v_and_a Object Label for Destroyed Computer #gchq #snowden.” Twitter, 2015. Accessed on 08 March 2022, https://twitter.com/arusbridger/status/582965778250596352?s=20&t=0D_9GSGGVr5Ou-ji-37jkQ
   Google Scholar
• Shapira, I. “Strategic Intelligence as an Art and a Science: Creating and Using Conceptual Frameworks.” Intelligence and National Security 35, no. 2 (2019): 283–299. doi:10.1080/02684527.2019.1681135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiff, R. “Introduction.” In Barnett Newman: Selected Writings and Interviews, edited by B. Newman. Oakland: University of California Press, 1992, xiii–xxviii
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. W. “Phenomenology.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2013. Accessed on 08 March 2022, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and W. Ceusters. “Ontological Realism: A Methodology for Coordinated Evolution of Scientific Ontologies.” Applied Ontology 5, no. 3–4 (2010): 139–188. doi:10.3233/AO-2010-0079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, M., and M. Warner. “Intelligence Is as Intelligence Does.” Intelligence and National Security 33, no. 4 (2018): 517–526. doi:10.1080/02684527.2018.1452593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treverton G. F. , Jones S. G. , Boraz S. , Lipscy P. (eds). Toward a Theory of Intelligence: Workshop Report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Vrist Rønn, K., and S. Høffding. “The Epistemic Status of Intelligence: An Epistemological Contribution to the Understanding of Intelligence.” Intelligence and National Security 28, no. 5 (2013): 694–716. doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.701438.
   Google Scholar