Justified true belief theory for intelligence analysis

Bibliography

• Agrell, W. Essence of Assessment: Methods and Problems of Intelligence Analysis, trans. S. Moores. Mölnlycke: Gleerups Utbildning AB, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ayer, A. J. The Problem of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books Ltd, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Beddor, B. “Process Reliabilism’s Troubles with Defeat.” The Philosophical Quarterly 65, no. 259 (2015): 145–159. doi:10.1093/pq/pqu075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bon Jour, L. “Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1980): 53–73. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1980.tb00396.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, J. B. “Making Analysis More Reliable: Why Epistemology Matters to Intelligence.” In Analyzing Intelligence: Origins, Obstacles, and Innovations, edited by R. Z. George and J. B. Bruce, 171–190. 1st ed. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. Quick Wins for Busy Analysts, Professional Heads of Intelligence Analysis. London: Cabinet Office, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, R. M. The Foundations of Knowing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, R. M. Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. “Justification and Truth.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 46, no. 3 (1984): 279–296. doi:10.1007/BF00372907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. “Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65, no. 2 (2002): 309–329. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00204.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comesaña, J. “Evidentialist Reliabilism.” Noûs 44, no. 4 (2010): 571–601. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00748.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt, N., and A. Fisher. Modern Epistemology: A New Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, R., and S. J. B. Sugden. “Reliability and Justification.” The Monist 68, no. 2 (1985): 159–174. doi:10.5840/monist198568226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, R. “What’s Wrong with Reliabilism?” The Monist 68, no. 2 (1985): 188–202. doi:10.5840/monist198568220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gettier, E. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23, no. 6 ([1963]1996): 121–123. doi:10.1093/analys/23.6.121.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I. “What Is Justified Belief?” Justification and Knowledge. edited by G. S. Pappas. 1–25. Dordrecht: Springer, 1979. reprinted in Goldman, A. I., Reliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology, New York: Oxford University Press, 2012: 2949.2949.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I. “Toward a Synthesis of Reliabilism and Evidentialism? Or: Evidentialism’s Troubles, Reliabilism’s Rescue Package.” In Evidentialism and Its Discontents, edited by T. Dougherty, 254–290. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I., and B. Beddor. “Reliabilist Epistemology.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edition. E. N. Zalta, edited by. Winter, Stanford, CA, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reliabilism. Accessed 12 December, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hájek, A. “Interpretations of Probability.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. E. N. Zalta, edited by. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/probability-interpret/&#x003E. Accessed 02 January, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, M. “The Intelligence Analyst as Epistemologist.” International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 19, no. 4 (2006): 668–684. doi:10.1080/08850600600829890.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, M. Intelligence Services in the Information Age: Theories and Practice. London: Routledge, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. J., Jr. The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. Washington DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. J., Jr. “Improving Intelligence Analysis with ACH.” Washington DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence Analysis, Central Intelligence Agency, (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. J., Jr., and R. Pherson. Structured Analytical Methods for Intelligence Analysis. London: CQ Press/Sage Publishing, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. “Developing a Taxonomy of Intelligence Analysis Variables.” Studies in Intelligence 47, no. 3 (2003): 261.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. “Analytic Culture in the US Intelligence Community: An Ethnographic Study.” In Center for the Study of Intelligence. Washington DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, J. “Bayes’ Theorem.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edition. E. N. Zalta, edited by. 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/bayes-theorem. Accessed 19 January, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, S. Strategic Intelligence for American World Policy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Krizan, L. “Intelligence Essentials for Everyone.” Occasional Paper 6, Washington DC: Joint Military Intelligence College, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhns, W. J. “Intelligence Failures: Forecasting and the Lessons from Epistemology.” In Paradoxes of Strategic Intelligence, edited by R. K. Betts and T. G. Mahnken, 90-109. London: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Laqueur, W. World of Secrets: The Uses and Limitations of Intelligence. New York: Basic Books, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, M. Intelligence: From Secrets to Policy. eighth ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, S. “Evaluating the Quality of Intelligence Analysis: By What (Mis) Measure?” Intelligence and National Security 27, no. 6 (2012): 869–912. doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.699290.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Paxson, T., Jr., and T. Paxson. “Knowledge: Undefeated Justified True Belief.” Journal of Philosophy 66, no. 8 (1969): 225–237. doi:10.2307/2024435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, J. L. “Reliability and Justified Belief.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14, no. 1 (1984): 103–114. doi:10.1080/00455091.1984.10716371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. “Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review 69, no. 1 (1951): 20–43. doi:10.2307/2181906.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. “Epistemology Naturalized.” In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 69–90. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Random, R. A. “Intelligence as a Science.” Studies in Intelligence 2, no. 2 (1958): 9–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, J. E. “Decision Advantage and the Nature of Intelligence Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of National Security Intelligence, edited by L. K. Johnson, 189–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Steup, M., and R. Neta. “Epistemology.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. edition. E. N. Zalta, edited by 2020. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/. Accessed 12 June, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Talbott, W. “Bayesian Epistemology. ” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. E. N. Zalta, edited by. 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/epistemology-bayesian. Accessed 12 June, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Treverton, G. F., and W. Fishbein. “Making Sense of Transnational Threats.” Sherman Kent Center for Intelligence Analysis. Vol. 3. Washington DC: Sherman Kent Center, 2004. Occasional Papers, no. 1 .
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A. Why Secret Intelligence Fails. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books Inc, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Criminal Intelligence Manual for Analysts. New York: United Nations, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidya, A. “The Epistemology of Modality.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. edition E. N. Zalta, edited by. Winter. 2017. Available athttp://plato.stanford/edu/archives/win2011/entries/modal-epistenology. Accessed 12 June, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, J. “Reliabilism Levelled.” The Journal of Philosophy 97, no. 1 (2000): 602–623. doi:10.2307/2678454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrist Ronn, K., and S. Hoffding. “The Epistemic Status of Intelligence: An Epistemological Contribution to the Understanding of Intelligence.” Journal of Intelligence and National Security 28, no. 5 (2013): 694–715. doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.701438.
   Google Scholar
• Vrist Ronn, K. “(Mis-)informed Decisions? On Epistemic Reasonability of Intelligence Claims.” International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 27, no. 2 (2014): 351–367. doi:10.1080/08850607.2014.842813.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. “Wanted: A Definition of Intelligence.” Studies in Intelligence 46, no. 3 (2002): 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. “The Divine Skein: Sun Tzu on Intelligence.” Intelligence and National Security 21, no. 4 (2006): 483–492. doi:10.1080/02684520600885624.
   Google Scholar
• Whitesmith, M. Cognitive Bias and Intelligence: Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar