Bibliography
- Aldrich, R. J. “Strategic Culture as a Constraint: Intelligence Analysis, Memory and Organizational Learning in the Social Sciences and History.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 5 (2017): 625–635. doi:10.1080/02684527.2017.1310977.
- Arcos, R. N. K. D. Mark Phythian “Bridging the Divide. In The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence Studies edited by R. Arcos, N. K. Drumhiller, and M. PhythianVol. 2022vol, pp. 253–274. Rowman & Littlefield. Accessed 17 February 2020. http://Armourproject.eu.
- Arcos, R. ”Understanding the Relationships Between Academia and National Security Intelligence in the European Context.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Universities, Security and Intelligence Studies. edited by L. F. Gearon. London and New York: Routledge, 2019. 2020 pp. 156–167.
- Bitton, R. ”In Law We Trust: The Israeli Case of Overseeing Intelligence.” In Global Intelligence Oversight: Governing Security in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Z. K. Goldman and S. J. Rascoff, pp. 141–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
- Breakspear, A. “A New Definition of Intelligence.” Intelligence and National Security 28, no. 5 (2013): 678–693. doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.699285.
- Bruce, J., ”Making Analysis More Reliable.” In Analyzing Intelligence: Origins, Obstacles, and innovations, edited by R. Z. George and J. B. Bruce. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press, 2008, pp 171-190.
- CIA ( undated) A consumer’s guide to intelligence. Accessed 17 February 2019. https://archive.org/details/consumersguide_tenet/page/n5/mode/2up.
- Coulthart, S. “What’s the Problem? Frameworks and Methods from Policy Analysis for Analyzing Complex Problems.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 5 (2017): 636–648.
- Cross, M. A. K. D. “A European Transgovernmental Intelligence Network and the Role of IntCen.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14, no. 3 (2013): 388–402. doi:10.1080/15705854.2013.817805.
- Dahl, E. J. “Getting Beyond Analysis by Anecdote: Improving Intelligence Analysis Through the Use of Case Studies.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 5 (2017): 563–578. doi:10.1080/02684527.2017.1310967.
- Dickson, P., and A.-K. Hiltunen, edited by. Hybrid CoE Research Report 4 : Security and Hybrid Threats in the Arctic: Challenges and Vulnerabilities of Securing the Transatlantic Arctic. Accessed 27 January 2022. https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/20211217-Hybrid-CoE-Research-Report-4-Security-and-hybrid-threats-in-the-Arctic-WEB.pdf.
- Dreikhausen, V. F. F. G. “Taliban in or Out?” EU ISS. 5 April 2022. Accessed 6 July 2022. https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/taliban-or-out#_scenario__civil_war__reloaded.
- Durbin, B. ”Bridging the Gap: The Scholar-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence.” In Researching National Security Intelligence: Multidisciplinary Approaches, edited by S. Coulthart, M. Landon-Murray, and D. Van Puyvelde, pp. 179–191. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 2019.
- ESSENTIAL Project-Fellows, https://www.essentialresearch.eu/k-department/fellows/, Accessed 6 July 2022.
- The European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats, Nuclear Energy and the Current Security Environment in the Era of Hybrid Threats, https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Nuclear-Research-Report-2019_web.pdf, Accessed 14 June 2019.
- European Commission, Internal Security Fund – Police Call for proposals document Call for proposals on preventing and countering violent radicalisation - ISFP-2018-AG-CT-RAD, https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/other_eu_prog/home/wp/isfp-call-fiche-2018-ag-ct-rad_en.pdf, Accessed 17 February 2020.
- European Commission (2018), Horizon 2020 - Work Programme 2018-2020, Secure societies- Protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens, https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-security_en.pdf, Accessed 17 February 2020.
- Gearon, L. F. ”The University-Security-Intelligence Nexus: Four Domains.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Universities, Security and Intelligence Studies, edited by L. F. Gearon, pp. 5–77. London and New York: Routledge, 2020.
- Gentry, J. A. “The “Professionalization” of Intelligence Analysis: A Skeptical Perspective.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 29, no. 4 (2016): 643–676.
- Gill, P. ”Knowing the Self, Knowing the Other: The Comparative Analysis of Security Intelligence.” In Handbook of Intelligence Studies, edited by L. Johnson, p. 82. New York: Routledge, 2007.
- Gill, P. S. M., and M. Phythian, edited by. Intelligence Theory: Key Questions and Debates. New York: Routledge, 2008.
- Gill, P., and M. Phythian. Intelligence in an Insecure World. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2018.
- Heuer, R. Quantitative Approaches to Political Intelligence: The CIA Experience. New York: Routledge, 2019. 1978.
- Jackson, P. J. J., & J. L. Siegel, edited by. Intelligence and Statecraft: The Use and Limits of Intelligence in International Society. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2005.
- Kent, S. Strategic Intelligence for American World Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.
- Kuczyński, G. Kaliningrad Energy Standoff Looms As Lithuania Banned Transit. 30 June 2022. Accessed 6 July 2022. https://warsawinstitute.org/kaliningrad-energy-standoff-looms-lithuania-banned-transit/.
- Marrin, S. “Homeland Security and the Analysis of Foreign Intelligence”. Markle Foundation Task Force on National Security in the Information Age, (2002). Accessed 15 February 2019. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/31736252/HOMELAND_SECURITY___ANALYSIS_OF_INTELLIGENCE.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DHomeland_Security_and_the_Analysis_of_Fo.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20200217%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20200217T080057Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=fbf761b7c68cd2127092aaca30fd7cfe79f7af5bc679663ed67a0bbdc29d9074
- Marrin, S. Improving Intelligence Analysis: Bridging the Gap Between Scholarship and Practice. London and New York: Routledge, 2011.
- Marrin, S. “Understanding and Improving Intelligence Analysis by Learning from Other Disciplines.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 5 (2017): 539–547. doi:10.1080/02684527.2017.1310913.
- Mrachek, A. P. B. “The U.S. Response to War on Ukraine Needs Work.” Warsaw Institute Review 2, no. 21 (2022): 7–13.
- National Academies of Sciences Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. A Decadal Survey of the Social and Behavioral Sciences: A Research Agenda for Advancing Intelligence Analysis. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/25335
- NATO Science and Technology Organization, https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/Pages/results.aspx?k=ALLintelligence%20scope%3A%22Search%20All%20STO%20Reports%22. Accessed 2 November 2021.
- Nolan, B. Information sharing and collaboration in the United States Intelligence community: an ethnographic study of the National Counterterrorism Center ( Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 2013. Accessed 14 April 2019. http://cryptome.org/2013/09/nolan-nctc.pdf.
- Nolan, B. “A Sociological Approach to Intelligence Studies.” In Researching National Security Intelligence: Multidisciplinary Approaches, edited by S. Coulthart, M. Landon-Murray, and D. Van Puyvelde, pp. 79–91. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 2019.
- Pherson, R. H., and R. J. Heuer Jr. Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis. Washington DC: Cq Press, 2011.
- Pherson, R. H., P. Mort Ranta, and C. Cannon. “Strategies for Combating the Scourge of Digital Disinformation.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 34, no. 2 (2021): 316–341. doi:10.1080/08850607.2020.1789425.
- Phythian, M. “Intelligence Analysis and Social Science Methods: Exploring the Potential for and Possible Limits of Mutual Learning.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 5 (2017): 600–612. doi:10.1080/02684527.2017.1310972.
- Phythian, M. ”Framing the Challenges and Opportunities of Intelligence Studies Research.” In Researching National Security Intelligence: Multidisciplinary Approaches, edited by S. Coulthart, M. Landon-Murray, and D. Van Puyvelde, pp. 11–27. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 2019.
- Pop, A. R. G. “Towards a Bifurcated Future in the US-China Relationship: What is in It for the EU?” Futures 125 (2021), pp 1-11.
- Portela, C., Sanctions, conflict and democratic backsliding, EU ISS, 1.06.2022. Accessed 6 July 2022. https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/sanctions-conflict-and-democratic-backsliding#_lessons_for_and_from_the_sanctions_on_russia
- Scott, L., and P. Jackson. “The Study of Intelligence in Theory and Practice.” Intelligence & National Security 19, no. 2 (2004): 139–169. doi:10.1080/0268452042000302930.
- Sims, J., ”Decision Advantage and the Nature of Intelligence Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of National Security Intelligence, edited by L. Johnson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 389-403.
- Sørensen, C. T. (2019). The ice dragon – Chinese interests in the Arctic. Accessed 17 February 2020. https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Strategic-Analysis-5_2019_rgb.pdf.
- Svendsen, A. D. “Introducing RESINT: A Missing and Undervalued “INT” in All-Source Intelligence Efforts.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 26, no. no 4 (2013): 777–794.
- Tang, J. “How Do We Know? What Intelligence Analysis Can Learn from the Sociology of Science”.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 5 (2017): 663–674.
- Treverton, G. F. Approaches To“outreach” for Intelligence. Försvarshögskolan. 2009. Accessed 27 June 2022. http://fhs.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A301254&dswid=5670.
- Treverton, G. F. Bridging the Divide Between Scientific and Intelligence Analysis. Försvarshögskolan. 2009. http://fhs.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?faces-redirect=true&aq2=%5B%5B%5D%5D&af=%5B%5D&searchType=SIMPLE&sortOrder2=title_sort_asc&query=&language=no&pid=diva2%3A301350&aq=%5B%5B%5D%5D&sf=all&aqe=%5B%5D&sortOrder=author_sort_asc&onlyFullText=false&noOfRows=50&dswid=461, Accessed 27 January 2022.
- Treverton, G. F., et al. (2019). Addressing Hybrid Threats. Accessed 17 February 2020. https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Treverton-AddressingHybridThreats.pdf.
- Verner, D., et al. (2019). Assessing Energy Dependency in the Age of Hybrid Threats, https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/AssessingEnergyDependencyintheAgeofHybridThreats-HybridCoE.pdf, Accessed 17 February 2020.
- Vrist Rønn, K., and S. Høffding. “The Epistemic Status of Intelligence: An Epistemological Contribution to the Understanding of Intelligence.” Intelligence and National Security 28, no. 5 (2013): 694–716 doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.701438.
- Walsh, P. F. “Improving Strategic Intelligence Analytical Practice Through Qualitative Social Research.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 5 (2017): 548–562. doi:10.1080/02684527.2017.1310948.
- Wheaton, K. J., and M. T. Beerbower. ”Towards a New Definition of Intelligence.” Stanford Law & Policy Review 17 (2006). Available at Accessed 17 February 2020. https://journals.law.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/stanford-law-policy-review/print/2006/04/wheaton_beerbower_17_stan._l._poly_rev._319.pdf.
- Whitesmith, M. (2020). “Experimental Research in Reducing the Risk of Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis”. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 1-26, www.saffron-project.eu, Accessed 17 February 2020.