Assessing intelligence oversight: the case of Sweden

Bibliography

• Aldrich, R. J., and D. Richterova. “Ambient Accountability: Intelligence Services in Europe and the Decline of State Secrecy.” West European Politics 41, no. 4 (2018): 1003–1024. doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1415780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. J., M. Ejnar Hansen, and P. H. J. Davies. “Oversight and Governance of the Danish Intelligence Community.” Intelligence & National Security 37, no. 2 (2022): 241–261. doi:10.1080/02684527.2021.1976919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., A. Boin, and M. Farjoun. “Dynamic Conservatism: How Institutions Change to Remain the Same.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 44 (2015): 89–119.
   Google Scholar
• Born, H., and T. Wetzling. “Intelligence Accountability: Challenges for Parliaments and Intelligence Services.” In Handbook of Intelligence Studies, edited by L. Johnson, 315–328. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., and H. Paul ’t. Understanding Policy Fiascoes. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bratt, P., and J. Guillou. “Sveriges spionage” [Sweden’s Espionage].” Folket i Bild/Kulturfront 2, no. 9 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Cayford, M., W. Pieters, and C. Hijzen. “Wolter Pieters & Constant Hijzen “Plots, Murders, and Money: Oversight Bodies Evaluating the Effectiveness of Surveillance Technology.” Intelligence & National Security 33, no. 7 (2018): 999–1021. doi:10.1080/02684527.2018.1487159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, M. Paul ’t Hart Great Policy Successes: Or, a Tale About Why It’s Amazing That Governments Get so Little Credit for Their Many Everyday and Extraordinary Achievements as Told by Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Create Space for a Less Relentlessly Negative View of Our Pivotal Public Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Defty, A. “From Committees of Parliamentarians to Parliamentary Committees: Comparing Intelligence Oversight Reform in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK.” Intelligence & National Security 35, no. 3 (2020): 367–384. doi:10.1080/02684527.2020.1732646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, J.-H. “Of Toothless Windbags, Blind Guardians and Blunt Swords: The Ongoing Controversy About the Reform of Intelligence Services Oversight in Germany.” Intelligence & National Security 31, no. 3 (2016): 397–415. doi:10.1080/02684527.2015.1017246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S., T. Schillemans, H. Paul ‘t, C. Ansell, L. B. Andersen, M. Flinders, B. Head, et al. “Rising to Ostrom’s Challenge: An Invitation to Walk on the Bright Side of Public Governance and Public Service.” Policy Design and Practice 4, no. 4 (2021): 441–451. doi:10.1080/25741292.2021.1972517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber, Centrum för Rättvisa v. Sweden, Application no. 35252/08, Judgement, Strasbourg, 25 May 2021.
   Google Scholar
• FII 2022a, retrieved from Fii’s Web Page Siun.Se on 1 November 2022
   Google Scholar
• FII 2022b, in Swedish Only: Siun, Årsredovisning 2021 [FII, Annual Report 2021], Stockholm 18 February 2022
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, C., E. O’Malley, and D. Ó Broin. “Policy Success/Policy Failure: A Framework for Understanding Policy Choices.” Administration 67, no. 2 (2019): 1–24. doi:10.2478/admin-2019-0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A., and A. Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P. “Of Intelligence Oversight and the Challenge of Surveillance Corporatism.” Intelligence & National Security 35, no. 7 (2020): 970–989. doi:10.1080/02684527.2020.1783875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Offices of Sweden: Action Plan: Case of Centrum För Rättvisa. V. Sweden (Application 35252/08), Judgment of 25 May 2021, Final on 25 May 2021, Stockholm 25 May 2022a.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. Great Planning Disasters. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Hijzen, C. “More Than a Ritual Dance. The Dutch Practice of Parliamentary Oversight and Control of the Intelligence Community.” Security and Human Rights 24, no. 3–4 (2013): 227–238. doi:10.1163/18750230-02404002.
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrand, C. “Intelligence Oversight and Accountability.” In Routledge Companion to Intelligence Studies, edited by R. Dover, M. S. Goodman, and C. Hillebrand, 305–312. London & New York: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, P. M. Secret Intelligence and Public Policy: A Dilemma of Democracy. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Inc, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. “A Shock Theory of Congressional Accountability for Intelligence.” In Handbook of Intelligence Studies, edited by L. Johnson, 343–360. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, I. “More Closely Watching the Spies: Three Decades of Experience.” In Who’s Watching the Spies? Establishing Intelligence Service Accountability, edited by H. Born, L. K. Johnson, and I. Leigh, 3–11. Nebraska: Potomac Books, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, I., and N. Wegge. “Introduction.” In Intelligence Oversight in the Twenty-First Century: Accountability in a Changing World, edited by I. Leigh and N. Wegge, 1–4. London & New York: Routledge, 2020. doi:10.4324/9781351188791-1.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and A. McConnel. “Towards a Framework for Establishing Policy Success.” Public Administration 88, no. 3 (2010): 564–583. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01803.x.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. “Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between.” Journal of Public Policy 30, no. 3 (2010): 345–362. doi:10.1017/S0143814X10000152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohrstedt, D. “Shifting Resources and Venues Producing Policy Change in Contested Subsystems: A Case Study of Swedish Signals Intelligence Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 39, no. 3 (2011): 461–484. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00417.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman, J., and A. Wildavsky. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B., and K. H. Goetz. “Secrecy in Europe.” West European Politics 41, no. 4 (2018): 825–845. doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1423456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. “Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24, no. 2 (1991): 147–115. doi:10.2307/419923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Government official report 1976, in Swedish only: Den militära underrättelsetjänsten, betänkande från 1974 års underrättelseutredning SOU 1976:19 [The military intelligence: report from the 1974 intelligence inquiry, SOU 1976:19]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government official report 2002, in Swedish only: Det grå brödraskapet. En berättelse om IB, SOU 2002:92 [The Grey Brotherhood: A Story About IB, SOU 2002:92]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government official report 2009, in Swedish only: Signalspaning för polisiära behov SOU 2009:66 [Signals intelligence for the police’s needs, SOU 2009:66]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government proposition 1999, in Swedish only: Regeringens proposition 1999/2000:25 Lag om forsvarsunderrättelseverksamhet [ Government proposition 1999/2000:25 Law on defence intelligence operations]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government proposition 2007, in Swedish only: Regeringens proposition 2006/07:63 En anpassad försvarsunderrättelseverksamhet [ Government proposition 2006/07:63 An adapted defence intelligence function]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government proposition 2009, in Swedish only: Regeringens proposition 2008/09:201 Förstärkt integritetsskydd vid signalspaning [The Govenment’s proposition 2008/09:201 Enhanced integrity protection in signals intelligence.]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government proposition 2012, in Swedish only: Regeringens proposition 2011/12:179 Polisens tillgång till signalspaning i försvarsunderrättelseverksamhet [The Government’s proposition 2011/12:179 The police’s access to signals intelligence in defence intelligence operations.]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government proposition 2019, in Swedish Only: Polisens Tillgång Till Underrättelser Från Försvarets Radioanstalt, Prop. 2018/19: 96 [The Police’s Access to Intelligence from the National Defence Radio Establishment, Proposition 2018/19: 96]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Justice Ministry report 2011, in Swedish Only: Departementsserien Och Promemorior Från Justitiedepartementet: Polisens Tillgång Till Signalspaning I Försvarsunderrättelseverksamhet Ds 2011: 44 [Ministerial Series and Memos from the Ministry of Justice: The Police’s Access to Signals Intelligence in Defence Intelligence Operations Ds 2011: 44]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Justice Ombudsman 1975, in Swedish Only: Jo: S Ämbetsberättelse 1975/76 [Jo’s Official Report 1975/76.]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Law 2000:130, in Swedish only: Lag 2000:130 om försvarsunderrättelseverksamhet [Law 2000:130 on defence intelligence operations.]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Law 2008:717, in Swedish Only: Lag 2008: 717 Om Signalspaning I Försvarsunderrättelseverksamhet [Law 2008/717 on Signals Reconnaissance in Defence Intelligence Operations.]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Law 2021:1173, in Swedish Only: Lag 2021: 1173 Om Ändring I Lagen (2008: 717) Om Signalspaning I Försvarsunderrättelseverksamhet [Law 2021: 1173 on Changes of the Law (2008: 717) on Signals Intelligence in Defence Intelligence Operations.]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Audit Organisation 2015, in Swedish with a summary in English: Kontrollen av försvarsunderrättelseverksamheten, RiR 2015:2 [Control of defence intelligence operations, RiR 2015:2]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament, in Swedish Only: Riksdagsskrivelse 2021/22: 45 [Parliamentary Letter 2021/22: 45], 24 November 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament 1973, in Swedish only: FöU 1973:25 Försvarsutskottets betänkande angående den militära underrättelsetjänsten mm. [The Parliament Defence Committee’s report on the military intelligence etc.]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament 1976, in Swedish only: Förordning (1976:498) med instruktion för försvarets underrättelsenämnd [Ordinance (1976:498) with instructions to the armed forces’ intelligence committee].
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament 2008, in Swedish Only: Försvarsutskottets Betänkande 2007/08: FöU15 Lag Om Signalspaning M.M. (Förnyad Behandling) [Parliament Defense Committee Report 2007/2008: FöU15 Signals Intelligence Act Etc. (Renewed Tratment)]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament 2009a, in Swedish only: Förordning (2009:969) med instruktion för Statens inspektion för försvarsunderrättelseverksamheten. [Ordinance (2009:969) with instructions to the Foreign Intelligence Inspectorate]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament 2009b, in Swedish only: Försvarsutskottets betänkande 2008/09:FöU11 Ändrad tidpunkt för signalspaning i kablar [Parliament Defence Committee report 2008/2009:FöU11 Changed time for signals intelligence in cables]
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament, in Swedish Only: § 10 Integritetsskydd Vid Signalspaning I Försvarsunderrättelseverksamhet [§ 10 Integrity Protection in Defence Intelligence Operations], Protocol 2 March 2022b.
   Google Scholar
• Wegge, N., and Wegge. “Njord “Intelligence Oversight and the Security of the State.” International Journal of Intelligence & CounterIntelligence 30, no. 4 (2017): 687–700. doi:10.1080/08850607.2017.1337445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegge, N., and T. Wetzling. 2020. “Contemporary and Future Challenges to Effective Intelligence Oversight” Leigh & WeggeEds., Intelligence Oversight in the Twenty-First Century: Accountability in a Changing World, London & New York: Routledge, 25–39. 10.4324/9781351188791-3
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D., and R. Kreissl “European Responses to the Snowden Revelations: A Discussion Paper,” Increasing Resilience in Surveillance Societies, December 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zegart, A. B. Eyes on Spies: Congress and the United States Intelligence Community. Stanford, Ca: Hoover Institution Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zegart, A. B. Spies, Lies, and Algorithms: The History and Future of American Intelligence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar