Transcription‐less analysis of aphasic discourse: A clinician's dream or a possibility?

References

• Altman , D. G. 1991 . Practical statistics for medical research , London : Chapman & Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong , E. 2000 . Aphasic discourse analysis: The story so far. . Aphasiology , 14 : 875 – 892 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles , L. 1998 . Conversational discourse analysis as a method for evaluating progress in aphasia: A case report. . Journal of Communication Disorders , 31 : 261 – 274 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles , L. and Bombard , T. 1998 . Conversational discourse analysis: Appropriate and useful sample sizes. . Aphasiology , 12 : 547 – 560 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady , M. , Armstrong , L. and Mackenzie , C. 2005 . Further evidence on topic use following right hemisphere brain damage: Procedural and descriptive discourse. . Aphasiology , 19 : 731 – 747 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady , M. and Mackenzie , C. 2001 . Gesture use following right hemisphere brain damage. . International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders , 36(suppl) : 35 – 40 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady , M. , Mackenzie , C. and Armstrong , L. 2003 . Topic use following right hemisphere brain damage during three semi‐structured conversational discourse samples. . Aphasiology , 17 : 881 – 904 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney , L. R. 1998 . “ Pragmatics and discourse: An introduction. ” . In Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults , Edited by: Cherney , L. R , Shadden , B. B and Coelho , C. A . 1 – 7 . Gaithersburg, MD : Aspen Publishers Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Comrie , P. 1999 . A study of the influence of dysarthria on conversational contributions Unpublished BSc thesis: University of Strathclyde, UK
   Google Scholar
• Comrie , P. , Mackenzie , C. and McCall , J. 2001 . The influence of acquired dysarthria on conversational turn taking. . Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics , 15 : 383 – 398 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss , J. L. 1981 . Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.) , New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass , H. , Kaplan , E. and Barresi , B. 2001 . The Boston diagnostic aphasia examination , Baltimore : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins .
   Google Scholar
• Landis , J. R. and Koch , G. 1977 . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. . Biometrics , 33 : 159 – 174 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMay , A. , David , R. and Thomas , A. P. 1988 . The use of spontaneous gesture by aphasic patients. . Aphasiology , 2 : 137 – 145 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser , R. and Milroy , L. 1993 . Linguistics and aphasia: Psycholinguistic and pragmatic aspects of intervention , London : Longman .
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie , C. , Brady , M. , Norrie , J. and Poedjianto , N. 2007 . Picture description in neurologically normal adults: Concepts and topic coherence. . Aphasiology , 21 : 340 – 354 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentis , M. and Prutting , C. A. 1991 . Analysis of topic as illustrated in a head‐injured and normal adult. . Journal of Speech & Hearing Research , 34 : 583 – 595 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miles , M. B. and Huberman , A. M. 1994 . Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.) , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Milroy , L. and Perkins , L. 1992 . Repair strategies in aphasic discourse: Towards a collaborative model. . Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics , 6 : 27 – 40 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas , L. E. and Brookshire , R. H. 1995 . Presence, completeness, and accuracy of main concepts in the connected speech of non‐brain‐damaged adults and adults with aphasia. . Journal of Speech and Hearing Research , 38 : 145 – 156 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prins , R. and Bastiaanse , R. 2004 . Analysing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. . Aphasiology , 18 : 1075 – 1091 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psathas , G. and Anderson , T. 1990 . The practices of transcription in conversation analysis. . Semiotica , 78 : 75 – 99 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists . 2005 . RCSLT clinical guidelines , Bicester, , UK : Speechmark Publishing Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Shadden , B. B. 1998 . “ Obtaining the discourse sample. ” . In Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults , Edited by: Cherney , L. R , Shadden , B. B and Coelho , C. A . 9 – 34 . Gaithersburg, MD : Aspen Publishers Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Sherratt , S. 2004 . The whole, the parts and the interaction: connections between different levels of discourse production Proceedings of the International Association of Logopaedics and Phoniatrics Conference, Brisbane, Australia, September
   Google Scholar
• Sherratt , S. 2007 . Multi‐level discourse analysis: A feasible approach. . Aphasiology , 21 : 375 – 393 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout , P. E. and Fleiss , J. L. 1979 . Intraclass correlations used in assessing rater reliability. . Psychological Bulletin , 86 : 420 – 428 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher , L. 2001 . Discourse sampling in the 21st century. . Journal of Communication Disorders , 34 : 131 – 150 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar