Effects of verb bias and syntactic ambiguity on reading in people with aphasia

REFERENCES

• Caplan, D. (1992). Language: Structure, processing and disorders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Baker, C., & Dehaut, F. (1985). Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia. Cognition , 21, 117–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Waters, G. S., DeDe, G., Michaud, J., & Reddy, A. (2007). A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral aspects. Brain and Language , 101(2), 103–15010.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho-Reyes, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Verb and sentence production and comprehension: Northwestern assessment of verbs and sentences (NAVS). Aphasiology , 26(10), 1250–1277. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.693584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., & Wood, L. T. (2010). The case controls design in neuropsychology: Inferential methods for comparing two single cases. Cognitive Neuropsychology , 27, 377–400. doi:10.1080/02643294.2011.559158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2010). Lexical-pragmatic and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 39(4), 345–374. doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9139-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2012). Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 41(5), 387–408. doi:10.1007/s10936-011-9191-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2013). Verb transitivity bias affects on-line sentence reading in PWA. Aphasiology , 27(3), 326–343. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.725243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (in press). Reading and listening in people with aphasia: Effects of syntactic complexity. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. W., Milman, L. H., & Thompson, C. K. (2008). Judgment of functional morphology in agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics , 21(1), 35–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary task (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Clifton, Jr. C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language , 25, 348–368. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research , 12, 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (1985). Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics. Cognition , 19, 133–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2002). Lexical biases in aphasic sentence comprehension: An experimental and corpus linguistic study. Aphasiology , 16, 1173–1198. doi:10.1080/02687030244000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., Menn, L., Ramsberger, G., Jurafsky, D., Elder, E., Rewega, M., & Audrey, L. H. (2003). Syntactic frame and verb bias in aphasia: Plausibility judgments of undergoer-subject sentences. Brain and Cognition , 53, 223–228. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00114-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language , 37, 58–93. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2000). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 23, 1–71. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00002399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, M., Carey, S., Zurif, E. B., & Diller, L. (1986). Form class judgments in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language , 28, 114–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston naming test: Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kemtes, K. A., & Kemper, S. (1997). Younger and older adults’ on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. Psychology and Aging , 12, 362–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Patterson, K. (2005). Acquired disorders of reading. In M. J. Snowling (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 413–430). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review , 101, 676–703. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, G. H., McNeil, M. R., & Doyle, P. J. (2002). Lexical access rate of closed-class elements during auditory sentence comprehension in adults with aphasia. Aphasiology , 16, 801–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2006). Syntactic parsing. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 455–503). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, B., Zurif, E., Brownell, H. H., Garrett, M., & Bradley, D. (1985). Grammatical class effects in relation to normal and aphasic sentence processing. Brain and Language , 26, 287–303. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(85)90044-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinney, D., Zurif, E., & Cutler, A. (1980). Effects of sentential stress and word class upon comprehension of Broca’s aphasics. Brain and Language , 10, 132–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Keurs, M., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2002). Lexical processing of vocabulary class in patients with Broca’s aphasia: An event-related brain potential study on agrammatic comprehension. Neuropsychologia , 40(9), 1547–1561. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00025-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Keurs, M., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Stegeman, D. F. (1999). Electrophysiological manifestations of open- and closed-class words in patients with Broca’s aphasia with agrammatic comprehension: An event-related brain potential study. Brain , 122, 839–854. doi:10.1093/brain/122.5.839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., & Choy, J. J. (2009). Pronominal resolution and gap filling in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 38, 255–283. doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9105-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., Lukic, S., King, M., Mesulam, M. M., & Weintraub, S. (2012). Verb and noun deficits in stroke-induced and primary progressive aphasia: The northwestern naming battery. Aphasiology , 26(5), 632–655. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.676852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N., & Hubley, A. M. (1997). The 60-item Boston naming test: Norms for cognitively intact adults aged 25 to 88 years. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19(6), 922–932.
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994).Towards a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resoclution. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives in sentence processing . (pp. 155–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar