Collaborative participation in aphasic word searching: comparison between significant others and speech and language therapists

References

• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2003). Exploring aphasic grammar 1: A single case analysis of conversation. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17, 81–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. (1994). The influence of aphasia, familiarity, and activity on conversational repair. Aphasiology, 8, 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., & Armstrong, E. (2004). Reflections on speech-language therapists’ talk: Implications for clinical practice and education. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39(4), 469–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactional resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversation with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Reviews of Anthropology, 19, 283–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and co-participation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62, 51–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haakana, M., Laakso, M., & Lindström, J. (2009). Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Heeschen, C., & Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: On the role of so-called telegraphic style in talk-in-interaction. Aphasiology, 13, 365–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helasvuo, M.-L., Laakso, M., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2004). Searching for words: Syntactic and sequential construction of word search in conversations of Finnish speakers with aphasia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, S. (2008). Learning in interaction: Resourceful work by people with aphasia and therapists in the course of language impairment therapy. Aphasiology, 22, 985–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, S., & Byng, S. (2000). Examining interaction in language therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 355–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia. Methods and resources for training conversational partners. Aphasiology, 12, 816–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., & Gailey, G. F. (1993). Functional is not enough: Training conversation partners for aphasic adults. In A. L. Holland & M. M. Forbes (Eds.), Aphasia treatment: World perspectives (pp. 199–225). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 35(3), 277–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (1997). Self-initiated repair by fluent aphasic speakers in conversation. Studia Fennica Linguistica 8. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2003). Collaborative construction of repair in aphasic conversation: An interactive view on the extended speaking turns of Wernicke’s aphasics. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 163–188). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2011). Aphasia as an example of how communication disorder affects interaction. In M. Egbert & A. Deppermann (Eds.), Hearing aids communication (pp. 138–145). Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the “hint and guess”—Sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13, 345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry to the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, J., & Wilkinson, R. (1999). Repair sequences in aphasic talk: A comparison of aphasic-SLT and aphasic-spouse conversations. Aphasiology, 13, 305–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milroy, L., & Perkins, L. (1992). Repair strategies in aphasic discourse; towards a collaborative model. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 6, 27–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M. (1999). Participation of a conversation partner in the word searches of a person with aphasia. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 8, 62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Volume II. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvast, M. (1991). Aphasia therapy dialogues. Aphasiology, 5, 383–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001). Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2010). Formulating actions and events with limited linguistic resources: Enactment and iconicity in agrammatic aphasic talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 57–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar