The effect of speaking rate on serial-order sound-level errors in normal healthy controls and persons with aphasia

References

• Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Twisting tongues and memories: Explorations of the relationship between language production and verbal working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 329–350. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvedson, J. C., McNeil, M. R., & West, T. L. (1986). Prediction of revised token test overall, subtest, and linguistic unit scores by two shortened versions. In Clinical Aphasiology Conference (pp. 57–63). Rockville, MD: BRK.
   Google Scholar
• Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382–391. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80017-X
   Google Scholar
• Bayles, K. A., & Tomoeda, M. S. (1993). Arizona battery for communication disorders of dementia. Tucson, AZ: Canyonlands.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, S. E. (1973). A phonological investigation of aphasic speech. Paris: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Boomer, D. S., & Laver, J. D. M. (1973). Slips of the tongue. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 120–131). Paris: Mouton & Co. N.V., Publishers. Reprinted from the British Journal of Disorders of Communication 3(1), 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Bose, A., Van Lieshout, P., & Square, P. A. (2007). Word frequency and bigram frequency effects on linguistic processing and speech motor performance in individuals with aphasia and normal speakers. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 65–88. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Miozzo, M. (2012). Phonological and motor errors in individuals with acquired sound production impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, S1573–S1586. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0200)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, H. W. (1980). On correlating aphasic errors with slips-of-the-tongue. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 199–120. doi:10.1017/S0142716400000849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, H. W. (1992). Phonological production deficits in conduction aphasia. In S. E. Kohn (Ed.), Conduction aphasia (pp. 77–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. (1973). Errors of speech and their implication for understanding the strategy of language users. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 88–92). Paris: Mouton & Co. N.V., Publishers. Reprinted from Zeitschrift fur Phonetik 21 (1/2): 177-81.
   Google Scholar
• CSL Computerized Speech Lab Model 4300B Software (Version 5.X). (1994). Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Dabul, B. (2000). Apraxia battery for adults - 2. Tigard, Oregon: C.C. Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Darley, F. L., Aronson, A. E., & Brown, J. R. (1969a). Clusters of deviant speech dimensions in the dysarthrias. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 462–496. doi:10.1044/jshr.1203.462
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darley, F. L., Aronson, A. E., & Brown, J. R. (1969b). Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 246–269. doi:10.1044/jshr.1202.246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deal, J. L., & Darley, F. L. (1972). The influence of linguistic and situational variables on phonemic accuracy in apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research, 15, 639–653. doi:10.1044/jshr.1503.639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124–142. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90070-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123–147. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSimoni, F. G., Keith, R. L., & Darley, F. L. (1980). Prediction of PICA overall score by short versions of the test. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 511–516. doi:10.1044/jshr.2303.511
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drummond, S. S. (1993). Dysarthria examination battery. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, N. D., Russell, S. S., & Drummond, S. S. (1989). Effect of stimulus context and response coding variables on word retrieval performances in dysphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22, 209–223. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(89)90017-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossett, T. R. D., McNeil, M. R., & Pratt, S. R. (2000). The effects of speaking rate on phonological encoding in normal adults. Manuscript in preparation. Pittsburgh. PA: University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Fozo, M. S., & Watson, B. C. (1998). Task complexity effect on vocal reaction time in aged speakers. Journal of Voice, 12, 404–414. doi:10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80049-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, S. A., & Wright, R. (2002). The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 139–162. doi:10.1006/jpho.2002.0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnham, A., Shillcock, R. C., Brown, G. D. A., Mill, A. I. D., & Cutler, A. (1981). Slips of the tongue in the London-Lund corpus of spontaneous conversation. Linguistics, 19, 805–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, K. L., Bays, G. L., & Ohde, R. N. (2001). Phonetic properties of aphasic-apraxic speech: A modified narrow transcription analysis. Aphasiology, 15, 1125–1142. doi:10.1080/02687040143000537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N., Ramage, A., Bayles, K. A., & Cruz, R. (1998). Perseverative behaviour in fluent and non-fluent aphasic adults. Aphasiology, 12, 689–698. doi:10.1080/02687039808249566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston Naming Test-2 (BNT-2) (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T. (2003). Patterns of timing in the acquisition, perception, and production of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 619–626. doi:10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00017-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (2003). Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: Action as a sequence of chunks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 135–150. doi:10.1080/00222890309602129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E., & Smith, K. L. (1990). Between-word speech errors in conduction aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 133–156. doi:10.1080/02643299008253440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2012). Patterns of impairments in AOS and mechanisms of interaction between phonological and phonetic encoding. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, S1535– S1543. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0316)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, E., & Mailend, M.-L. (2012). Speech planning happens before speech execution: Online reaction time methods in the study of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research, 55, S1523–S1534. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0311)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. G., & James, L. E. (2004). Sequencing, speech production, and selective effects of aging on phonological and morphological speech errors. Psychology & Aging, 19, 93–107. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailend, M.-L., & Maas, E. (2013). Speech motor programming in apraxia of speech: Evidence from a delayed picture-word interference task. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 22, S380–S396. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0101)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., & Dell, G. S. (2004). Perseverations and anticipations in aphasia: Primed intrusions from the past and future. Seminars in Speech and Language, 25, 349–362. doi:10.1055/s-2004-837247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, N., Dell, G. S., Saffran, E. M., & Schwartz, M. F. (1994). Origins of paraphasias in deep dysphasia: Testing the consequences of a decay impairment to an interactive spreading activation model of lexical retrieval. Brain and Language, 47, 609–660. doi:10.1006/brln.1994.1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., & Kent, R. D. (1990). Motoric characteristics of adult aphasic and apraxic speakers. In G. R. Hammond (Ed.), Advances in psychology: Cerebral control of speech and limb movements (pp. 349–386). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., & Pratt, S. R. (2001). Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition. Aphasiology, 15, 901–911. doi:10.1080/02687040143000276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., & Prescott, T. E. (1978). Revised token test. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2009). Apraxia of speech: Definition, differentiation and treatment. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 311–344). New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, K., McNeil, M. R., Rosenbek, J. C., & Hunter, L. (1990). Perceptual characteristics of consonant production by apraxic speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 345–359. doi:10.1044/jshd.5502.345
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porch, B. E. (1981). Porch index of communicative ability. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press Psychological Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Pouplier, M., Marin, S., & Waiti, S. (2014). Voice onset time in consonant cluster errors: Can phonetic accommodation differentiate cognitive from motor errors? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 1577–1588. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-12-0412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1965). The coloured progressive matrices. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1988). Raven’s coloured progressive matrices (CPM). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1999). Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 173–200. doi:10.1080/016909699386338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. A., & Storkel, H. L. (1998). Reprogramming phonologically similar utterances: The role of phonetic features in pre-motor encoding. Journal of Speech Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 258–274. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4102.258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruml, W., Caramazza, A., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2005). Interactivity and continuity in normal and aphasic language production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 131–168. doi:10.1080/02643290442000031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2014). Motor learning and performance. From principles to application (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime’s user guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., Bloch, D. E., & Dell, G. S. (1994). Disordered speech production in aphasic and normal speakers. Brain and Language, 47, 52–88. doi:10.1006/brln.1994.1042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., & Kent, R. D. (1995). Clinical phonetics (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Shuster, L. I., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2000). Perceptual and acoustic analyses of speech sound errors in apraxia of speech accompanied by aphasia. Aphasiology, 14, 635–651. doi:10.1080/026870300401360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P. (1989). Speech errors in early child language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 164–188. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90042-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towne, R. L., & Crary, M. A. (1988). Verbal reaction time patterns in aphasic adults. Consideration for Apraxia of Speech, Brain & Language, 35, 138–153. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(88)90105-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao, Y.-C., Weismer, G., & Iqbal, K. (2006). The effect of intertalker speech rate variation on acoustic vowel space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1074–1082. doi:10.1121/1.2149774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Merwe, A. (2009). A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vousden, J. I., Brown, G. D. A., & Harley, T. A. (2000). Serial control of phonology in speech production: A hierarchical model. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 101–175. doi:10.1006/cogp.2000.0739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vousden, J. I., & Maylor, E. A. (2006). Speech errors across the lifespan. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 48–77. doi:10.1080/01690960400001838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., Duffy, J. R., McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Rogers, M. A. (2006). Treatment guidelines for acquired apraxia of speech: A synthesis and evaluation of the evidence. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 14, xv–xxxiii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E. (1999). The “tongue twister” paradigm as a technique for studying phonological encoding. Language and Speech, 42, 57–82. doi:10.1177/00238309990420010301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E., & McCarthy, R. A. (1996). Experimental investigations of an impairment in phonological encoding. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 1059–1098. doi:10.1080/026432996381782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., & Antablin, J. K. (1980). A picture identification task as an estimate of the word-recognition performance of nonverbal adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 223–238. doi:10.1044/jshd.4502.223
   PubMedGoogle Scholar