A rational inference approach to aphasic language comprehension

References

• Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47, 31–56. doi:10.1177/00238309040470010201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Friederici, A., & Wulfeck, B. (1987). Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 32, 19–67. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(87)90116-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., McDonald, J. L., MacWhinney, B. M., & Appelbaum, M. (1991). A maximum likelihood procedure for the analysis of group and individual data in aphasia research. Brain and Language, 40, 231–265. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90126-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., & MacWhinney, B. (1991). Cross-linguistic research in aphasia: An overview. Brain and Language, 41, 123–148. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90149-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., & Wayland, S. (1997). Patterns of sentence comprehension in aphasia: A consideration of three hypotheses. Brain and Language, 60, 197–221. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biassou, O., Nespoulous, D., & Harris, K. S. (1997). Dual processing of open- and closed-class words. Brain and Language, 57, 360–373. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnan, J. (1982). The Passive in Lexical Theory. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnan, J. (2007). Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In S. Featherston & W. Sternefeld (Eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base (pp. 75–96). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Baker, C., & Dehaut, F. (1985). Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia. Cognition, 21, 117–175. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90048-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., DeDe, G., & Michaud, J. (2006). Task-independent and task-specific syntactic deficits in aphasic comprehension. Aphasiology, 20, 893–920. doi:10.1080/02687030600739273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Futter, C. (1986). Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an agrammatic patient. Brain and Language, 27, 117–134. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(86)90008-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Waters, G., & Hildebrandt, N. (1997). Determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasic patients in sentence-picture matching tasks. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 40, 542–555. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4003.542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77–126. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, M., & Hufford, R. (2013). Dissociations and associations of performance in syntactic comprehension in aphasia and their implications for the nature of aphasic deficits. Brain and Language, 127, 21–33. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Basili, A. G., Koller, J. J., & Berndt, R. S. (1981). An investigation of repetition and language processing in a case of conduction aphasia. Brain and Language, 14, 235–271. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(81)90078-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures (No. 9). Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Clayards, M., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Jacobs, R. A. (2008). Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues. Cognition, 108, 804–809. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, F., Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., Utman, J., Dronkers, N., & Gernsbacher, M. (2001). Language deficits, localization, and grammar: Evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. Psychological Review, 108, 759–788. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (1988). Agrammatic comprehension: Picture of a computational mismatch. Aphasiology, 2, 279–282. doi:10.1080/02687038808248924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Schoenle, P. W. (1980). Computational dissociation of two vocabulary types: Evidence from aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 18, 11–20. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(80)90079-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2003). Lexical biases in aphasic sentence comprehension: An experimental and corpus linguistic study. Aphasiology, 16, 1173–1198. doi:10.1080/02687030244000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., Menn, L., Ramsberger, G., Jurafsky, D. S., Elder, E., Rewega, M., & Audrey, L. H. (2003). Syntactic frame and verb bias in aphasia: Plausibility judgments of undergoer-subject sentences. Brain and Cognition, 53, 223–228. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00114-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., & Zurif, E. (1975). Bee but not be: Oral reading of single words in aphasia and alexia. Neuropsychologia, 13, 181–190. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(75)90027-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Y. Miyashita, A. Marantz, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain (pp. 95–126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 8051–8056. doi:10.1073/pnas.1216438110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. (1998). Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 262–268. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01187-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1986). Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language, 27, 135–159. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(86)90009-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1995a). Trace Deletion, theta-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language, 51, 469–497. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1995b). A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 51, 26–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1–21. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00002399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. Proceedings of NAACL, 2, 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, K. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1976). The nature of comprehension errors in Broca’s, conduction and Wernicke’s aphasics. Cortex, 12, 258–265. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(76)80007-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelinek, F. (1976). Continuous speech recognition by statistical methods. Proceedings of IEEE, 64, 532–556. doi:10.1109/PROC.1976.10159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2006). Western Aphasia Battery – Revised (WAB-R). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H., & Van Grunsven, M. M. (1985). Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 347–384. doi:10.1080/02643298508252666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo, T. (1984). The effect of semantic plausibility on sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 21, 208–218. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(84)90047-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008a). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008b) A noisy-channel model of rational human sentence comprehension under uncertain input. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), pp 234–243.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 21086–21090. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907664106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffran, E. M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13, 361–392. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90015-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, T., & Oster, E. (2002). On the categorization of aphasic typologies: The SOAP (A tests of syntactic complexity). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 503–529. doi:10.1023/A:1021208903394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C. (1989). Priming effects from gaps to antecedents. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 35–56. doi:10.1080/01690968908406356
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. J. C. (2003). Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Osmán-Sági, J., & Slobin, D. I. (1991). Sentence comprehension in aphasia in two clear case-marking languages. Brain and Language, 41, 234–249. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90154-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Maximum likelihood models for sentence processing research. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 397–421). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671–717. doi:10.1080/02643299408251989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady, W., & Lee, M. (2005). A mapping theory of agrammatic comprehension deficits. Brain and Language, 92, 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prather, P., Shapiro, L., Zurif, E., & Swinney, D. (1991). Real-time examinations of lexical processing in aphasics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 271–281. doi:10.1007/BF01067219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., & Schwartz, M. F. (1994). Impairment of sentence comprehension. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 346, 47–53. doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Linebarger, M. C. (1998). Semantic influences on thematic role assignment: Evidence from normals and aphasics. Brain and Language, 62, 255–297. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salis, C., & Edwards, S. (2009). Tests of syntactic comprehension in aphasia: An investigation of task effects. Aphasiology, 23, 1215–1230. doi:10.1080/02687030802380165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism, I. Comprehension. Brain and Language, 10, 249–262. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(80)90055-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Gorrell, P., & Tuller, B. (1989). Reception of language in Broca’s aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 1–33. doi:10.1080/01690968908406355
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 623–656. doi:10.1002/bltj.1948.27.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In P. Eimas & J. L. Miller (eds), Handbook of perception and cognition: language (pp. 217–162). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, T., Liburd, T., & Dickey, M. W. (2014, October). Sentence comprehension in aphasia: A noisy channel approach. Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Wulfeck, B., & Bates, E. (1991). Differential sensitivity to errors of agreement and word order in Broca’s aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 258–272. doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.3.258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulfeck, B. B. (1988). Grammaticality judgments and sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 31, 72–81. doi:10.1044/jshr.3101.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114, 245–272.
   Google Scholar