Theory of mind impairment after right-hemisphere damage

References

• Apperly, I. A. (2011). Mindreaders: The cognitive basis of “Theory of Mind”. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 116, 953–970. doi:10.1037/a0016923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., Carroll, N., Hussain, S., & Humphreys, G. (2006). Intact first- and second-order false belief reasoning in a patient with severely impaired grammar. Social Neuroscience, 1, 334–348. doi:10.1080/17470910601038693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., Chiavarino, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2004). Frontal and temporo-parietal lobe contributions to theory of mind: Neuropsychological evidence from a false-belief task with reduced language and executive demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1773–1784. doi:10.1162/0898929042947928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaban, N., Belletti, A., Friedmann, N., & Rizzi, L. (2016). Disentangling principle C: A contribution from individuals with brain damage. Lingua, 169, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2015.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaban, N., Friedmann, N., & Ariel, M. (2016, this volume). The effect of theory of mind impairment on language: Referring after right hemisphere damage. Aphasiology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 813–822. doi:10.1111/jcpp.1997.38.issue-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 407–418. doi:10.1023/A:1023035012436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251. doi:10.1111/jcpp.2001.42.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, C. M., Castelli, F., Malik, O., Frith, U., & Husain, M. (2004). The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on `Theory of Mind’ and cognition. Brain, 127, 914–928. doi:10.1093/brain/awh108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, M. L. (2006). Clinical relevance of discourse characteristics after right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 15, 255–267. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/024)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, M. L. (2007). Perspectives on treatment for communication deficits associated with right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 16, 331–342. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2007/037)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, H., Griffin, R., Winner, E., Friedman, O., & Happé, F. (2000). Cerebral lateralization and theory of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 306–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, H., Pincus, D., Blum, A., Rehak, A., & Winner, E. (1997). The effects of right hemisphere brain damage on patients’ use of terms of personal reference. Brain and Language, 57, 60–79. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, H., & Stringfellow, A. (1999). Making requests: Illustrations of how right-hemisphere brain damage can affect discourse production. Brain and Language, 68, 442–465. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne, M., Virbel, J., Nespoulous, J., & Joanette, Y. (2003). Impact of right hemispheric damage on a hierarchy of complexity evidenced in young normal subjects. Brain and Cognition, 53, 152–157. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00099-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne-Lavau, M., & Joanette, Y. (2009). Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions after a right-hemisphere lesion: Different patterns of deficits. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 413–426. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channon, S., Rule, A., Maudgil, D., Martinos, M., Pellijeff, A., Frankl, J., … Shieff, C. (2007). Interpretation of mentalistic actions and sarcastic remarks: Effects of frontal and posterior lesions on mentalising. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1725–1734. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheang, H., & Pell, M. (2006). A study of humour and communicative intention following right hemisphere stroke. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20, 447–462. doi:10.1080/02699200500135684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, W. A., & Perner, J. (1994). Implicit understanding of belief. Cognitive Development, 9, 377–395. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(94)90012-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Howell, D. C. (1998). Regression equations in clinical neuropsychology: An evaluation of statistical methods for comparing predicted and obtained scores. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 755–762. doi:10.1076/jcen.20.5.755.1132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers, J. G. (2004). Getting complements on your mental state (verbs). In J. van Kampen & S. Baauw (Eds.), Proceedings of 2003 GALA Conference LOT Occasional Series 3. (pp. 13–26). Utrecht: LOT.
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers, J. G. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117, 1858–1878. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers, J. G., & Pyers, J. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false belief understanding. Cognitive Development, 17, 1037–1060. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00073-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Gvion, A. (2003). Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation in aphasia: A dissociation between semantic-syntactic and phonological reactivation. Brain and Language, 86, 23–39. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00530-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358, 459–473. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, H. L., Happé, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: An fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 11–21. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00053-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, R., Friedman, O., Ween, J., Winner, E., Happé, F., & Brownell, H. (2006). Theory of mind and the right cerebral hemisphere: Refining the scope of impairment. Laterality, 11, 195–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, F. (1969). Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics, 11, 1–21. doi:10.1080/00401706.1969.10490657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gvion, A., & Friedmann, N. (2008). FriGvi: Friedmann Gvion battery for assessment of phonological working memory. Language and Brain, 7, 161–180. (in Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Gvion, A., & Friedmann, N. (2012). Phonological short-term memory in conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 579‎–‎614. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.643759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, C. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003). The influence of language on theory of mind: A training study. Developmental Science, 6, 346–359. doi:10.1111/desc.2003.6.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154. doi:10.1007/BF02172093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (1999). Acquired `theory of mind’ impairments following stroke. Cognition, 70, 211–240. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00005-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F., Winner, E., & Brownell, H. (1998). The getting of wisdom: Theory of mind in old age. Developmental Psychology, 34, 358–362. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.2.358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hird, K., & Kirsner, K. (2003). The effect of right cerebral hemisphere damage on collaborative planning in conversation: An analysis of intentional structure. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17, 309–315. doi:10.1080/0269920031000080037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., & Ansaldo, A. I. (1999). Clinical note: Acquired pragmatic impairments and aphasia. Brain and Language, 68(3), 529–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, C. L., Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J. (2008). Discourse impairments following right hemisphere brain damage: A critical review. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 1038–1062. doi:10.1111/lnco.2008.2.issue-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kempler, D., Van-Lancker, D., Marchman, V., & Bates, E. (1999). Idiom comprehension in children and adults with unilateral brain damage. Developmental Neuropsychology, 15, 327–349. doi:10.1080/87565649909540753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The Role of Language in the Development of False Belief Understanding: A Training Study. Child Development, 74, 1130–1144. doi:10.1111/cdev.2003.74.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, K., Brownell, H., Cayer-Meade, C., Milione, J., & Kearns, K. (2011). Treating metaphor interpretation deficits subsequent to right hemisphere brain damage: Preliminary results. Aphasiology, 25, 456–474. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.500809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2006). That Can’t Be Right! What Causes Pragmatic Language Impairment Following Right Hemisphere Damage? Brain Impairment, 7, 202–211. doi:10.1375/brim.7.3.202
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Rodríguez, J. F., & León-Carrión, J. (2010). Theory of mind deficits in patients with acquired brain injury: A quantitative review. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1181–1191. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. (2000). Neuropsychological studies of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 85–98. doi:10.1080/10926488.2000.9678866
   Google Scholar
• Myers, P. S. (2001). Toward a definition of RHD syndrome. Aphasiology, 15, 913–918. doi:10.1080/02687040143000285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, P. S. (2005). Profiles of communication deficits in patients with right cerebral hemisphere damage: Implications for diagnosis and treatment. Aphasiology, 19, 1147–1160. doi:10.1080/02687030500331585 (Original work published in 1979, in Clinical Aphasiology Conference: (9th: Phoenix, AZ: May 28-31, 1979): BRK Publishers, 38–46).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308, 255–258. doi:10.1126/science.1107621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, C. (1999). Pragmatic assessment and therapy for persons with brain damage: What have clinicians gleaned in two decades? Brain and Language, 68, 535–552. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, C. (2000). Paying attention to conversation. Brain and Language, 71, 185–189. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, M. R. (2005). Pragmatic ability and disability as emergent phenomena. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19, 367–377. doi:10.1080/02699200400027155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 437–471. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(85)90051-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbagh, M. A. (1999). Communicative intentions and language: Evidence from right-hemisphere damage and autism. Brain and Language, 70, 29–69. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbagh, M. A., & Flynn, J. (2006). Mid frontal EEG alpha asymmetries predict individual differences in one aspect of theory of mind: Mental state decoding. Social Neuroscience, 1, 299–308. doi:10.1080/17470910601029163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, R., & Powell, L. J. (2006). It’s the thought that counts: Specific brain regions for one component of theory of mind. Psychological Science, 17, 692–699. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01768.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, R., & Wexler, A. (2005). Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1391–1399. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132, 617–627. doi:10.1093/brain/awn279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). The neuro-anatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relationship to social cognition. Neuropsychology, 19, 288–300. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherratt, S., & Bryan, K. (2012). Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, 213–239. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegal, M., Carrington, J., & Radel, M. (1996). Theory of mind and pragmatic understanding following right hemisphere damage. Brain and Language, 53, 40–50. doi:10.1006/brln.1996.0035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegal, M., & Varley, R. (2002). Neural systems involved in ‘theory of mind’. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 463–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slessor, G., Phillips, L. H., & Bull, R. (2007). Exploring the specificity of age-related differences in theory of mind tasks. Psychology and Aging, 22, 639–643. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 640–656. doi:10.1162/089892998562942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, S., Ziv, M., & Stein, A. (2002). Teaching as a natural cognition and its relations to preschoolers developing theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 104, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K., Zaitchik, D., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1994). Preschoolers can attribute second-order beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 395–402. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.3.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surian, L., & Siegal, M. (2001). Sources of performance on theory of mind tasks in right hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 78, 224–232. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H., & Sullivan, K. (1994). A second look at second-order belief attribution in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 577–586. doi:10.1007/BF02172139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A. (2012). Rehabilitation for cognitive-communication disorders in right hemisphere brain damage. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, S61–69. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Scharp, V. L., Fassbinder, W., Meigh, K. M., & Armstrong, E. M. (2008). A different story on “Theory of mind” deficit in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Aphasiology, 22, 42–61. doi:10.1080/02687030600830999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, R., & Siegal, M. (2000). Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and ‘theory of mind’ in an agrammatic aphasic patient. Current Biology, 10, 723–726. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00538-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, R., Siegal, M., & Want, S. C. (2001). Severe impairment in grammar does not preclude theory of mind. Neurocase, 7, 489–493. doi:10.1093/neucas/7.6.489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684. doi:10.1111/cdev.2001.72.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weylman, S. T., Brownell, H., Roman, M., & Gardner, H. (1989). Appreciation of indirect requests by left and right brain damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording. Brain and Language, 36, 580–591. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90087-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E., Brownell, H., Happé, F., Blum, A., & Pincus, D. (1998). Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain- damaged patients. Brain and Language, 62, 89–106. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv, M., & Frye, D. (2004). Children’s understanding of teaching: The role of knowledge and belief. Cognitive Development, 19, 457–477. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv, M., Solomon, A., & Frye, D. (2008). Young children’s recognition of the intentionality of teaching. Child Development, 79, 1237–1256. doi:10.1111/cdev.2008.79.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar