The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement

References

• Barker, J., McCarthy, P., Jones, M., & Moran, A. (2011). Single case research methods in sport and exercise psychology. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J. B., Mellalieu, S. D., McCarthy, P. J., Jones, M. V., & Moran, A. (2013). A review of single-case research in sport psychology 1997–2012: Research trends and future directions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25, 4–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2012.709579
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 161–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7
   Google Scholar
• Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., & Ravaud, P., & the CONSORT Group. (2008). Extending the CONSORT Statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, 295–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, E. W. (2007). Delphi technique. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of measurement and statistics (Vol. 1, pp. 240–246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412952644.n128
   Google Scholar
• Didden, R., Korzilius, H., van Oorsouw, W., & Sturmey, P. (2006). Behavioral treatment of challenging behaviors in individuals with mild mental retardation: Meta-analysis of single-subject research. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, 290–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[290:btocbi]2.0.co;2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, D., & Gast, D. L. (2010). Descriptive analysis of single subject research designs: 1983–2007. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 187–202. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23879806
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Kratochwill, T. R., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2014). The What Works Clearinghouse single-case design pilot standards: Who will guard the guards? Remedial and Special Education, 35, 145–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518979
   Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (2014). Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14376-000
   Google Scholar
• Maggin, D. M., Briesch, A. M., Chafouleas, S. M., Ferguson, T. D., & Clark, C. (2014). A comparison of rubrics for identifying empirically supported practices with single-case research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 287–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9187-z
   Google Scholar
• Maggin, D. M., Chafouleas, S. M., Goddard, K. M., & Johnson, A. H. (2011). A systematic evaluation of token economies as a classroom management tool for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 529–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Simera, I., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Medicine, 7, e1000217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Weeks, L., Ocampo, M., Seely, D., Sampson, M., Altman, D. G.,… Hoey, J. (2011). Describing reporting guidelines for health research: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 718–742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.013
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., & Morgan, R. K. (2009). Single-case research methods for the behavioral and health sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483329697
   Google Scholar
• Perdices, M., & Tate, R. L. (2009). Single-subject designs as a tool for evidence-based clinical practice: Are they unrecognised and undervalued? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19, 904–927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09602010903040691
   Google Scholar
• Punja, S., Bukutu, C., Shamseer, L., Sampson, M., Hartling, L., Urichuk, L., & Vohra, S. (in press). Systematic review of the methods, statistical analysis, and meta-analysis of N-of-1 trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
   Google Scholar
• Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Burns, M. K. (2009). Evaluating educational interventions: Single-case design for measuring response to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., & Sullivan, K. J. (2011). Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 971–980. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0111-y
   Google Scholar
• Shamseer, L., Sampson, M., Bukutu, C., Schmid, C. H., Nikles, J., Tate, R.,… and the CENT group. (2015). CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: Explanation and elaboration. British Medical Journal, 350, h1793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj/h1793
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D. (2012). Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods, 17, 510–550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029312
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and N-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 385–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09602010802009201
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., McDonald, S., Togher, L., & Rosenkoetter, U. (2014). The design, conduct and report of single-case research: Resources to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 315–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.875043
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., McDonald, S., Togher, L., Shadish, W.,… for the SCRIBE Group. (2016). The Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 4, 10–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Godbee, K., Togher, L., & McDonald, S. (2013a). Manual for the critical appraisal of single-case reports using the Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Godbee, K., Togher, L., & McDonald, S. (2013b). Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and N-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23, 619–638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.824383
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Sigmundsdottir, L., Doubleday, J., Togher, L.,… Perdices, M. (2015). The Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale: An expanded manual for the critical appraisal of single-case reports. Sydney, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, L., Shamseer, L., Altman, D. G., Weeks, L., Peters, J., Kober, T.,… Moher, D. (2012). Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11, MR000030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.mr000030.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Parker, R. I. (2013). Single case research in schools: Practical guidelines for school-based professionals. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vohra, S., Shamseer, L., Sampson, M., Bukutu, C., Schmid, C. H., Tate, R.,… and the CENT group. (2015). CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement. British Medical Journal, 350, h1738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj/h1738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Review and implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, 1525–1536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013
   Google Scholar
• Wolery, M., Dunlap, G., & Ledford, J. R. (2011). Single-case experimental methods: Suggestions for reporting. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 103–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1053815111418235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar