261
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Corpus-based transitivity biases in individuals with aphasia

, &
Pages 447-464 | Received 23 May 2016, Accepted 05 Dec 2016, Published online: 20 Jan 2017

References

  • Basso, A., Razzano, C., Faglioni, P., & Zanobio, M. E. (1990). Confrontation naming, picture description and action naming in aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 4, 185–195. doi:10.1080/02687039008249069
  • Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Mitchum, C. C., & Sandson, J. (1997a). Verb retrieval in aphasia. 2. Relationship to sentence processing. Brain and Language, 56, 107–137. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1728
  • Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., Haendiges, A. N., & Sandson, J. (1997b). Verb retrieval in aphasia. 1. Characterizing single word impairments. Brain and Language, 56, 68–106. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1727
  • Darwin, C. M., & Gray, L. S. (1999). Going after the phrasal verb: An alternative approach to classification. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 65–83. doi:10.2307/3588191
  • DeDe, G. (2012). Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 387–408. doi:10.1007/s10936-011-9191-1
  • DeDe, G. (2013a). Effects of verb bias and syntactic ambiguity on reading in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 326–343. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.725243
  • DeDe, G. (2013b). Verb transitivity bias affects on-line sentence reading in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 326–343. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.725243
  • Gahl, S. (2002). Lexical biases in aphasic sentence comprehension: An experimental and corpus linguistic study. Aphasiology, 16, 1173–1198. doi:10.1080/02687030244000428
  • Gahl, S., Jurafsky, D., & Roland, D. (2004). Verb subcategorization frequencies: American english corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 432–443. doi:10.3758/BF03195591
  • Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58–93. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2512
  • Kim, M., & Thompson, C. K. (2000). Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language, 74, 1–25. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2315
  • Lee, J., & Thompson, C. K. (2015). Phonological facilitation effects on naming latencies and viewing times during noun and verb naming in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology, 29, 1164–1188. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1035225
  • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). AphasiaBank: Methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology, 25, 1286–1307. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.589893
  • Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Villa, G., & Caramazza, A. (1984). On the basis for the agrammatic’s difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 20, 207–220. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(84)80038-6
  • Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J. L. (2007). Frequency of basic english grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 348–379. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002
  • Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37, 440–479. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90030-8
  • Staub, A. (2007). The parser doesn’t ignore intransitivity, after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 550–569.
  • Webster, J., Franklin, S., & Howard, D. (2007). An analysis of thematic and phrasal structure in people with aphasia: What more can we learn from the story of Cinderella? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 363–394. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.02.002
  • Whitworth, A. (1995). Characterizing thematic role assignment in aphasic sentence production – Procedures for elicited and spontaneous output. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30, 384–399. doi:10.3109/13682829509021450

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.