Rhetorical structure and Alzheimer’s disease

References

• Ahmed, S., de Jager, C. A., Haigh, A.-M., & Garrard, P. (2013). Semantic processing in connected speech at a uniformly early stage of autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 27, 79–85. doi:10.1037/a0031288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almor, A., Kempler, D., MacDonald, M. C., Andersen, E. S., & Tyler, L. K. (1999). Why do Alzheimer patients have difficulty with pronouns? Working memory, semantics, and reference in comprehension and production in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language, 67, 202–227. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. T., Boller, F., Lopez, O. I., Saxton, J., & McGonigle, K. L. (1994). The natural history of Alzheimer’s disease: Description of study cohort and accuracy of diagnosis. Archives of Neurology, 51, 585–594. doi:10.1001/archneur.1994.00540180063015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhaduri, S., Das, R., & Ghosh, D. (2016). Non-invasive detection of Alzheimer’s disease – multifractality of emotional speech fractal and multifractal analysis and speech. Journal of Neurology and Neuroscience, 7, 1–7. doi:10.21767/2171-6625.100084
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, L., & Marcu, D. (2001). Discourse tagging reference manual (Tech. Rep.). Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, L., Marcu, D., & Okurowski, M. E. (2001). Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. In Proceedings of Second SIGDial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 1–10). Aalborg: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chai, J. Y., & Jin, R. (2004). Discourse structure for context question answering. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Pragmatics of Question Answering at HLT-NAACL 2004 (pp. 23–30). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. B., Zientz, J., Weiner, M., Rosenberg, R., Frawley, W., & Burns, M. H. (2002). Discourse changes in early Alzheimer disease, mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 16, 177–186. doi:10.1097/00002093-200207000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charniak, E., & Johnson, M. (2005). Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2005) (Vol. 1, pp. 173–180). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273–297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B. H., & Smith, M. K. (2009). Infusing cultural competence training into the curriculum: Describing the development of culturally sensitive training on dementia communication. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 25, 503–509. doi:10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70557-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Ouden, H. (2004). Prosodic realizations of text structure (PhD). Tilburg: University of Tilburg
   Google Scholar
• den Ouden, H., Van Wijk, C., Terken, J., & Noordman, L. (1998). Reliability of discourse structure annotation (Vol. 33, Tech. Rep.). IPO Center for Research on User-System Interaction, Technical University of Eindhoven.
   Google Scholar
• Duverle, D. A., & Prendinger, H. (2009). A novel discourse parser based on support vector machine classification. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP (Vol. 2, pp. 665–673). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Faber-Langendoen, K., Morris, J. C., Knesevich, J. W., LaBarge, E., Miller, J. P., & Berg, L. (1988). Aphasia in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Annals of Neurology, 23, 365–370. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1531-8249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, V. W. (2014). RST-Style Discourse Parsing and Its Applications in Discourse Analysis (PhD Thesis). Toronto: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, V. W., & Hirst, G. (2014). A linear-time bottom-up discourse parser with constraints and post-editing. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL14) (p. 511–521). Assocation for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S., & Roark, B. (2007). The utility of parse-derived features for automatic discourse segmentation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL 2007) (pp. 488–495). Assocation for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes-McKay, K., Shanks, M. F., & Venneri, A. (2013). Profiling spontaneous speech decline in Alzheimer’s disease: A longitudinal study. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 25, 320–327. doi:10.1017/neu.2013.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, K., Rudzicz, F., & Rochon, E. (2013). Using text and acoustic features to diagnose progressive aphasia and its subtypes. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2013 (pp. 2177–2181). Lyon, France: Assocation for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, K. C., Meltzer, J. A., & Rudzicz, F. (2015). Linguistic features identify Alzheimer’s disease in narrative speech. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 49, 407–422. doi:10.3233/JAD-150520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1991). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40, 67–88. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90117-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz, C., Noblet, V., Phillipps, C., Cretin, B., Vogt, N., Philippi, N., … Blanc, F. (2016). Cognitive and affective theory of mind in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, 8, 10. doi:10.1186/s13195-016-0179-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernault, H., Bollegala, D., & Ishizuka, M. (2010). A sequential model for discourse segmentation. In International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (pp. 315–326).  Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J. R. (1985). On the coherence and structure of discourse (Tech. Rep.). Technical report CSLI- 85-37. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J., & Jensen, M. (1980). A pragmatic evaluation of discourse communication in normal and senile elderly in a nursing home. In L. Obler & M. Albert (Eds.), Language and communication in the elderly (pp. 59–74). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Joty, S., Carenini, G., Ng, R., & Mehdad, Y. (2013). Combining intra- and multi-sentential rhetorical parsing for document-level discourse analysis. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2013) (pp. 486–496). Sofia Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Joty, S., Carenini, G., & Ng, R. T. (2012). A novel discriminative framework for sentence-level discourse analysis. In Proceedings of the Joint meeting of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2012) (pp. 904–915).  Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston naming test (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., Marquis, J., Thompson, M., & Marquis, J. (2001). Longitudinal change in language production: Effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional content. Psychology and Aging, 16, 600–614. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.4.600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempler, D., & Goral, M. (2008). Language and dementia: Neuropsychological aspects. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 28, 72–90. doi:10.1017/S0267190508080045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner, H. S., Webb, W. G., & Kelly, M. P. (1984). The naming disorder of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 22, 23–30. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(84)90004-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knott, A., & Dale, R. (1994). Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 18, 35–62. doi:10.1080/01638539409544883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancashire, I. (2010). Forgetful muses: Reading the author in the text. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lancashire, I., & Hirst, G. (n.d.). Vocabulary changes in Agatha Christie’s mysteries as an indication of dementia: A case study. In 19th Annual Rotman Research Institute Conference, Cognitive Aging: Research and Practice (pp. 1–5), 8–10 March 2009, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Le, X., Lancashire, I., Hirst, G., & Jokel, R. (2011). Longitudinal detection of dementia through lexical and syntactic changes in writing: A case study of three British novelists. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 26, 435–461. doi:10.1093/llc/fqr013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2002). Fast context-free grammar parsing requires fast Boolean matrix multiplication. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 49, 1–15. doi:10.1145/505241.505242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., Kan, M.-Y., & Ng, H. T. (2009). Recognizing implicit discourse relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2009) (pp. 343–351). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, A., Joshi, A., & Nenkova, A. (2010). Discourse indicators for content selection in summarization. In Proceedings of SIGDIAL 2010: the 11th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, (pp. 147–156). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). AphasiaBank: Methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology, 25, 1286–1307. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.589893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 8, 243–281.
   Google Scholar
• Marcu, D., Romera, M., & Amorrortu, E. (1999). Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging (pp. 48–57). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, N., & Guendouzi, J. A. (2002). Transcribing discourse: Interactions with Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 16, 345–359. doi:10.1080/02699200210135875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordman, L., Dassen, I., Swerts, M., & Terken, J. (1999). Prosodic markers of text structure. In K. van Hoek, A. Kibrik, & L. Noordman (Eds.), Discourse studies in cognitive linguistics (pp. 133–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Okie, S. (2011). Confronting Alzheimer’s disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 365, 1069–1072. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1107288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orange, J. B., & Purves, B. (1996). Conversational discourse and cognitive impairment: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Speech-Language, Pathology and Audiology, 20, 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Orimaye, S. O., & Golden, K. J. (2014). Learning predictive linguistic features for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias using verbal utterances. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality (pp. 78–87). Baltimore, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, C., & Davis, B. H. (2011). Finding a balance: The Carolinas Conversation Collection. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7, 143–161. doi:10.1515/cllt.2011.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, C., & Ripich, D. N. (2006). Speak to me, listen to me: Ethnic and gender variations in talk and potential consequences in interactions for people with Alzheimer’s disease. In B. Davis (Ed.), Alzheimer talk, text and context (pp. 37–59). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Miltsakaki, E., Robaldo, L., Joshi, A., & Webber, B. (2008). The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08) (pp. 1–4). European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, R., Joshi, A., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., & Miltsakaki, E. (2005). The penn discourse treebank as a resource for natural language generation. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Workshop on Using Corpora for NLG. Birmingham
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., Troche, J., Grossman, M. (2011). Language processing in dementia. In A. E. Budson & Kowall, N. W. (Eds.), The handbook of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ripich, D. N., Vertes, D., Whitehouse, P., Fulton, S., & Ekelman, B. (1991). Turn-taking and speech act patterns in the discourse of senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type patients. Brain and Language, 40, 330–343. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90133-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, M., Tym, E., & Mountjoy, C. Q. (1986). CAMDEX. A standardised instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly with special reference to the early detection of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 698–709. doi:10.1192/bjp.149.6.698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzicz, F., Wang, R., Begum, M., & Mihailidis, A. (2015). Speech interaction with personal assistive robots supporting aging at home for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 7, 1–22. doi:10.1145/2785580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholman, M., Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T. J. (2016). A step-wise approach to discourse annotation: Towards a reliable categorization of coherence relations. Dialogue & Discourse, 1, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas Lima, B., Graham, N. L., Leonard, C., Black, S. E., Wai, D. F. T., Freedman, M., … Rochon, E. (2016). The effect of semantic memory impairment on the speech of svPPA patients: A discourse-level analysis. In Proceedings of the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association Conference (ICPLA). Halifax, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Snowdon, D. A., Kempler, S. J., Mortimer, J. A., Greiner, L. H., Wekstein, D. R., & Markes-Bery, W. R. (1996). Linguistic ability in early life and cognitive function and Alzheimer’s disease in later life. Journal of American Medical Association, 275, 528–532. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530310034029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderman, M. (2012). The Effects of Alzheimer’s Disease on Expressive Language Over Time (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Szatloczki, G., Hoffmann, I., Vincze, V., Kalman, J., & Pakaski, M. (2015). Speaking in Alzheimer’s disease, is that an early sign? Importance of changes in language abilities in Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7, 1–7. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2015.00195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada, M., & Mann, W. C. (2006). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies, 8, 423–459. doi:10.1177/1461445606061881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taler, V., & Phillips, N. A. (2008). Language performance in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A comparative review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 30, 501–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, B. (2004). D-LTAG: Extending lexicalized TAG to discourse. Cognitive Science, 28, 751–779. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2805_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, M. F., Neubecker, K. E., Bret, M. E., & Hynan, L. S. (2008). Language in Alzheimer’s disease. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69, 1223–1227. doi:10.4088/JCP.v69n0804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Rochon, E., Mihailidis, A., & Leonard, C. (2012). Examining success of communication strategies with Alzheimer’s disease during an activity of daily living. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 328–341. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0206)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, F., & Gibson, E. (2005). Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based study. Computational Linguistics, 31, 249–287. doi:10.1162/0891201054223977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancheva, M., & Rudzicz, F. (2016). Vector-space topic models for detecting Alzheimer’s disease. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2016). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar