Different approaches in aphasia assessments: a comparison between test and everyday conversations

References

• Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-04057-5
   Google Scholar
• Blom Johansson, M., Carlsson, M., & Sonnander, K. (2011). Svenska logopeders insatser till personer med afasi. Logopednytt, 3, 18–22. Avilable from: http://www.dik.se/media/126582/logopednytt_3_2011_webb_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L., Fergusom, A., & Spencer, E. (2016). Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature. Clinical Lingusitics & Phonetics, 30, 489–518. doi:10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, M., & Eriksson, H. (2008). Aspekter på afasibedömning i ett ICF-perspektiv. Master thesis from the Department of Speech and Language Pathology, Sahlgrenska academy of, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Damico, J. S., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2006). Transcribing gaze and gesture. In N. Müller (Eds.), Multilayered transcription (pp. 93–111). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, W., & Wilcox, M. (1985). Adult aphasia rehabilitation: Applied pragmatics. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger. doi:10.1002/jnr.490110313
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversation with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233–260. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Context, activity and participation. In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 77–99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeschen, C., & Schegloff, E. A. (2003). Aphasic agrammatism as interactional artifact and achievement. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation & brain damage (pp. 231-282)). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In R. Sanders & K. Fitch (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103–149). New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Holck, P., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Nettelbladt, U. (2009). Interaction during intervention: Conversations between professionals and children with cerebral palsy. Communication & Medicine, 6, 49–60. doi:10.1558/cam.v6i1.49
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L. (1982). Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 50–56. doi:10.1044/jshd.4701.50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laakso, M. (1997). Self-initiated repair by fluent aphasic speakers in conversation. In Studia fennica linguistica 8. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2003). Collaborative construction of repair in aphasic conversation: An interactive view on the extended speaking turns of Wernicke’s aphasics. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation & brain damage (pp. 163–188). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the ‘hint and guess’ sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13, 345–363. doi:10.1080/026870399402136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser, R., & Milroy, L. (1993). Linguistics and aphasia: Psycholinguistic and pragmatic aspects of intervention. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, E., & Werner, C. (1995). Test manual: A-ning, neurolingvistisk afasiundersökning. Stockholm: Ersta utbildningsinstitut.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). Asymmetries in dialouge: Some conceptual preliminaries. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dailogue (pp. 1–20). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Milroy, L., & Perkins, L. (1992). Repair strategies in aphasic discourse: Towards a collaborative model. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 6, 27–40. doi:10.3109/02699209208985517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L., & Coppens, P. (2013). Formal and informal assessment of aphasia. In I. Papathanasiou, P. Coppens, & C. Potagas (Eds.), Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 66–91). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Patidar, Y., Gupta, M., Khwaja, G. A., Chowdhury, D., Batra, A., & Dasqupta, A. (2013). A case of crossed aphasia with apraxia of speech. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.116929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21, 205–243. doi:10.1093/applin/21.2.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1985). Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 124–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2010). Conversation analysis. In M. J. Ball, N. Müller, & R. L. Nelson (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in communication disorders (pp. 79–82). New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar