Discourse measurement in aphasia research: have we reached the tipping point?

References

• Andreetta, S., & Marini, A. (2015). The effect of lexical deficits on narrative disturbances in fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 29, 705–723. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.979394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottenberg, D., Lemme, M. L., & Hedberg, N. (1985). Analysis of oral narratives of normal and aphasic adults. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings, 1985, pp.241–247. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00000860/01/15-31.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2014). Test-retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 966–978. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2015). Stability of word-retrieval errors with the AphasiaBank stimuli. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24, S953–S960. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M, & Coelho, C. A. (1995). Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 94-98. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360.0404.94
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, M., & Dietz, A. (2015). Discourse measurement in aphasia research: Have we reaching the tipping point? Paper presented at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Monterey, California.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M. C., Ali, M., Fyndanis, C., Kambanaros, M., Grohmann, K. K., Laska, A., … Varlokosta, S. (2014). Time for a step change? Improving the efficiency, relevance, reliability, validity and transparency of aphasia rehabilitation research through core outcome measures, a common data set and improved reporting criteria. Aphasiology, 28, 1385–1392. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.930261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke (Article CD000425). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016. Retrieved August 1, 2016, from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4/full
   Google Scholar
• COMET. (2016). Core outcome measures in effectiveness trials initiative (COMET). Retrieved from http://www.comet-initiative.org/
   Google Scholar
• Del Toro, C. M., Altmann, L. J. P., Raymer, A. M., Leon, S., Blonder, L. X., & Rothi, L. J. R. (2008). Changes in aphasic discourse after contrasting treatments for anomia. Aphasiology, 22, 881–892. doi:10/1080/02687030701844204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. R. (2000) Paradigms and tipping points. Paper presented to the 2000 Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Kona Coast, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Goral, M., & Kempler, D. (2009). Training verb production in communicative context: Evidence from a person with chronic non-fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 23, 1383–1397. doi:10.1080/02687030802235203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, A., Grassly, J., Hickin, J., & Best, W. (2010). Phonological and orthographic cueing therapy: A case of generalized improvement. Aphasiology, 24, 991–1016. doi:10.1080/02687030903168220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham, J. J., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Clarke, M., & Williamson, P. R. (2013). Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years. Trials, 14, 1–8. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham, J. J., Gargon, E., Clarke, M., & Williamson, P. R. (2013). Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?–A survey of the co-ordinating editors of cochrane review groups. Trials, 14, 1–5. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Doyle, P. J., Fossett, T. R. D., Park, G. H., & Goda, A. J. (2001). Reliability and concurrent validity of the information unit scoring metric for the story retelling procedure. Aphasiology, 15, 991–1006. doi:10.1080/02687040143000348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milman, L., Vega-Mendoza, M., & Clendenen, D. (2014). Integrated training for aphasia: An application of part-whole learning to treat lexical retrieval, sentence production, and discourse-level communications in three cases of nonfluent aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, 105–119. doi:10.1044/2014AJSLP-12-0054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Improvement Partnership Network (NIPN) (2016). Asthma core measures: Core and optional process and outcome. Retrieved from https://www.uvm.edu/medicine/nipn/documents/NIPNAsthmaMeasures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (2016). NINDS common data elements. Retrieved from https://commondataelements.ninds.nih.gov/#page=Default
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E, & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 36, 338-350. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashek, G. V., & Tompkins, C. A. (2002). Context and word class influences in lexical retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 261–286. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37, 440–479. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(89)90030-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sautenet, B., Caille, A., Halimi, J. M., Goupille, P., & Giraudeau, B. (2013). Better reporting and greater homogeneity in outcome measures are seen in randomized trial protocols when guidelines exist. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66, 838–846. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., Fink, R. B., Myers, J. L., & Martin, N. (1994). Mapping therapy: A treatment programme for agrammatism. Aphasiology, 8, 19–54. doi: 10.1080/02687039408248639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Macaluso-Haynes, S., & North, A. J. (1980). Production of narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings, 1980, pp.17–27. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00000684/01/10-02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2014a). A good outcome for aphasia. Aphasiology, 28, 1400–1404. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.935119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2014b). Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardisation. Aphasiology, 28, 1364–1384. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.930262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2016). Which treatment outcomes are most important to aphasia clinicians and managers? An international e-Delphi consensus study. Aphasiology, 1464–5041. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1186265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Le Dorze, G., Cruice, M., Isaksen, J., … Gauvreau, C. A. (2016). Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? an international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1–16. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1194899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, A., Leitão, S., Cartwright, J., Webster, J., Hankey, G. J., Zach, J., … Wolz, V. (2015). NARNIA: A new twist to an old tale. A pilot RCT to evaluate a multilevel approach to improving discourse in aphasia. Aphasiology, 29, 1345–1382. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1081143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar