Narrative comprehension by people with aphasia given single versus combined modality presentation

References

• Berl, M. M., Duke, E. S., Mayo, J., Rosenberger, L. R., Moore, E. N., VanMeter, J., … Gaillard, W. D. (2010). Functional anatomy of listening and reading comprehension during development. Brain and Language, 114, 115–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrie, S. A., McAuliffe, M. J., & Liss, J. M. (2012). Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: A review of experimental studies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 290–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. A., Wallace, S. E., Knollman-Porter, K., & Hux, K. (2018). Comprehension of single versus multiple modality information by people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. doi:10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0132
   Google Scholar
• Caspari, I., Parkinson, S. R., LaPointe, L. L., & Katz, R. C. (1998). Working memory and aphasia. Brain and Cognition, 37, 205–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney, L. (2004). Aphasia, alexia, and oral reading. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 22–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 793–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Enos, M., York, M. J., Francis, D. J., Barnes, M. A., Kulesz, P. A., … Carter, S. (2015). Text‐processing differences in adolescent adequate and poor comprehenders reading accessible and challenging narrative and informational text. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 393–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Hux, K., McKelvey, M. L., Beukelman, D. R., & Weissling, K. (2009). Reading comprehension by people with chronic aphasia: A comparison of three levels of visuographic contextual support. Aphasiology, 23, 1053–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Knollman-Porter, K., Hux, K., Toth, K., & Brown, B. (2014). Supported reading comprehension for people with aphasia: Visual and linguistic supports. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 319–331.
   Google Scholar
• Dorze, G. L., Brassard, C., Larfeuil, C., & Allaire, J. (1996). Auditory comprehension problems in aphasia from the perspective of aphasic persons and their families and friends. Disability and Rehabilitation, 18, 550–558. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289609166316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, R., & Bernstein-Ellis, E. (2006). Aphasia book clubs: Making the connection. Stroke Connection, May/June, 32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289609166316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, J., Hux, K., Scott, N., & Snell, J. (2013). Text-to-speech technology effects on reading rate and comprehension by adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 27, 1388–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, J., Hux, K., & Snell, J. (2013). Using text-to-speech reading support for an adult with mild aphasia and cognitive impairment. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 35, 39–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2017). Cognitive-linguistic quick test - plus. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• How to write easy-to-read health materials. (2017, June 28). Retrieved from https://medlineplus.gov/etr.html
   Google Scholar
• Howe, T. J., Worrall, L. E., & Hickson, L. M. (2008). Interviews with people with aphasia: Environmental factors that influence their community participation. Aphasiology, 22, 1092–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad, K. C., & Cahill, M. A. (2003). Effects of presentation mode and repeated familiarization on intelligibility of dysarthric speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 198–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hux, K., Knollman-Porter, K., Brown, J., & Wallace, S. E. (2017). Comprehension of synthetic speech and digitized natural speech by adults with aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 69, 15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2006). Western aphasia battery – revised. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Knollman-Porter, K., Powlen, S., & Robinson, E. (2016). May, Gestural comprehension supports for individuals with chronic severe aphasia. Poster session presented at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Charlottesville, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Knollman-Porter, K., Wallace, S. E., Hux, K., Brown, J., & Long, C. (2015). Reading experiences and use of supports by people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 29, 1448–1472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPointe, L., & Horner, J. (1998). RCBA-2: Reading comprehension battery for aphasia – second edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• LaPointe, L. L. (2011). Humanistic basics: Adaptation, accommodation, and aristos. In L. L. LaPointe (Ed.), Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders (4th ed., pp. 9–26). New York: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Lasker, J., Hux, K., Garrett, K., Moncrief, E., & Eischeid, T. (1997). Variations on the written choice communication strategy for individuals with severe aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13(2), 108–116.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M., Doyle, P., Hula, W., Rubinsky, H., Fossett, T., & Matthews, C. (2004). Using resource allocation theory and dual‐task methods to increase the sensitivity of assessment in aphasia. Aphasiology, 18, 521–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L., Holland, A. L., & Beeson, P. M. (1997). Auditory processing in individuals with mild aphasia: A study of resource allocation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 792–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, A. J., McCallum, E., Hale, A. D., Obeldobel, E., & Dingus, K. (2009). Can text-to-speech assistive technology improve the reading comprehension of students with severe reading and emotional disabilities. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 10(2), 95–119.
   Google Scholar
• Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D. (2004). Comprehensive aphasia test. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, S. (2006). Passage dependency of reading comprehension items in the GEPT and the TOEFL. The Reading Matrix, 6, 66–84.
   Google Scholar
• Tuinman, J. J. (1974). Determining the passage dependency of comprehension questions in 5 major tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 9, 206–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (1998). Universal design and assistive technology in communication and information technologies: Alternatives or complements? Assistive Technology, 10, 29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. E., Dietz, A., Hux, K., & Weissling, K. (2012). Augmented input: The effect of visuographic supports on the auditory comprehension of people with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 162–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, M. R., & Darley, F. L. (1978). The influence of context on the auditory comprehension of paragraphs by aphasic subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 732–745. doi:10.1044/jshr.2104.732.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster, J., Morris, J., Howard, D., & Garraffa, M. (2018). Reading for meaning: What influences paragraph understanding in aphasia? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27, 423–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L., Lasker, J., Siegel-Causey, E., Beukelman, D. R., & Ball, K. (1998). Input framework for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Zakariás, L., Keresztes, A., Marton, K., & Wartenburger, I. (2018). Positive effects of a computerised working memory and executive function training on sentence comprehension in aphasia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 28, 369–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar